Uncovering barriers and paths for ensuring road mitigation to reduce wildlife collisions: Establishing grounds for action

IF 2.8 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
Yuri Geraldo Gomes Ribeiro, Erica Naomi Saito, Mariana Labão Catapani, Rafael Batista de Morais, Débora Regina Yogui, Taís Sonetti-González, Maria Mancilla Garcia, Arnaud Léonard Jean Desbiez
{"title":"Uncovering barriers and paths for ensuring road mitigation to reduce wildlife collisions: Establishing grounds for action","authors":"Yuri Geraldo Gomes Ribeiro,&nbsp;Erica Naomi Saito,&nbsp;Mariana Labão Catapani,&nbsp;Rafael Batista de Morais,&nbsp;Débora Regina Yogui,&nbsp;Taís Sonetti-González,&nbsp;Maria Mancilla Garcia,&nbsp;Arnaud Léonard Jean Desbiez","doi":"10.1111/csp2.70124","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Mitigating wildlife-vehicle collisions (WVC) is crucial for reducing roadkill and preserving biodiversity. This study identifies barriers to WVC mitigation and proposes solutions through an exploratory literature review and formal expert elicitation. We conducted semi-structured interviews with 17 WVC specialists from diverse regions of Brazil, coding 10 key barriers and achieving consensus on 22 solutions. The barriers identified encompass a range of economic, social, political, and technical factors, including road manager type, lack of public policy, and limited societal awareness. The BR-262 highway case study further contextualizes our findings, illustrating how these barriers manifest in real-world scenarios. Co-created strategies with stakeholders emerged as the most effective, with high levels of agreement among specialists. Our results underscore that unaddressed barriers limit the effectiveness of mitigation measures, stressing the need for collaborative approaches that integrate public policy, community engagement, and technical innovation to overcome these challenges.</p>","PeriodicalId":51337,"journal":{"name":"Conservation Science and Practice","volume":"7 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://conbio.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/csp2.70124","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Conservation Science and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://conbio.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/csp2.70124","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Mitigating wildlife-vehicle collisions (WVC) is crucial for reducing roadkill and preserving biodiversity. This study identifies barriers to WVC mitigation and proposes solutions through an exploratory literature review and formal expert elicitation. We conducted semi-structured interviews with 17 WVC specialists from diverse regions of Brazil, coding 10 key barriers and achieving consensus on 22 solutions. The barriers identified encompass a range of economic, social, political, and technical factors, including road manager type, lack of public policy, and limited societal awareness. The BR-262 highway case study further contextualizes our findings, illustrating how these barriers manifest in real-world scenarios. Co-created strategies with stakeholders emerged as the most effective, with high levels of agreement among specialists. Our results underscore that unaddressed barriers limit the effectiveness of mitigation measures, stressing the need for collaborative approaches that integrate public policy, community engagement, and technical innovation to overcome these challenges.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

发掘确保道路缓解以减少野生动物碰撞的障碍和路径:确定采取行动的理由
减少野生动物与车辆碰撞(WVC)对于减少道路死亡和保护生物多样性至关重要。本研究通过探索性文献综述和正式的专家启发,确定了减缓WVC的障碍,并提出了解决方案。我们对来自巴西不同地区的17名WVC专家进行了半结构化访谈,对10个主要障碍进行了编码,并就22个解决方案达成了共识。所确定的障碍包括一系列经济、社会、政治和技术因素,包括道路管理者类型、缺乏公共政策和有限的社会意识。BR-262高速公路案例研究进一步说明了我们的发现,说明了这些障碍在现实世界中的表现。与利益相关者共同制定战略是最有效的,专家之间达成了高度一致。我们的研究结果强调,未解决的障碍限制了缓解措施的有效性,强调需要采取协作方法,将公共政策、社区参与和技术创新结合起来,以克服这些挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Conservation Science and Practice
Conservation Science and Practice BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION-
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
6.50%
发文量
240
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信