Time in LDL cholesterol target range and major adverse cardiovascular events risk: A pooled analysis of two cohorts

IF 5.9 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Yezhou Liu , Zhe Lv , Hong Yan , Yamei Liu , Jiaheng Zhang , Wenming Bian , Yetong Liu , Zhaojie Song , Peng Han , Tao Chen , Chao Li
{"title":"Time in LDL cholesterol target range and major adverse cardiovascular events risk: A pooled analysis of two cohorts","authors":"Yezhou Liu ,&nbsp;Zhe Lv ,&nbsp;Hong Yan ,&nbsp;Yamei Liu ,&nbsp;Jiaheng Zhang ,&nbsp;Wenming Bian ,&nbsp;Yetong Liu ,&nbsp;Zhaojie Song ,&nbsp;Peng Han ,&nbsp;Tao Chen ,&nbsp;Chao Li","doi":"10.1016/j.ajpc.2025.101290","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Traditional management of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) relies on single-point measurements, neglecting long-term magnitude and the duration of exposure to elevated LDL-C over time. This study aimed to evaluate the association between LDL-C time in target range (TTR) and the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in two US cohorts.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This study was a secondary analysis of the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study and the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA) cohorts. LDL-C TTR was defined as the percentage of the area under curve for LDL-C values below 100 mg/dL relative to the total area over the first 4 visits. Association between LDL-C TTR and MACE was estimated using adjusted Cox models and Fine-Gray competing risk models.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Over a mean follow-up of 21.2 ± 8.1 years, 3306 MACE occurred among 16,310 participants. The highest LDL-C TTR quartile was associated with a 25 % reduction in MACE (HR: 0.75, 95 % CI: 0.68 to 0.83), 42 % reduction in myocardial infarction (HR: 0.58, 95 % CI: 0.49 to 0.68), 24 % reduction in stroke (HR: 0.76, 95 % CI: 0.64 to 0.91), and 13 % reduction in CVD death (HR: 0.87, 95 % CI: 0.76 to 1.00; borderline significance). TTR remained significantly associated with MACE after adjusting for mean LDL-C or LDL-C variability, and were robust in competing risk analyses. TTR also outperformed mean LDL-C and LDL-C variability in prognostic value (Akaike information criterion, C-statistics).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>LDL-C TTR independently predicts MACE and may offer a more comprehensive assessment of long-term LDL-C control than mean levels or variability, supporting its potential clinical utility.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72173,"journal":{"name":"American journal of preventive cardiology","volume":"24 ","pages":"Article 101290"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of preventive cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666667725003654","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Traditional management of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) relies on single-point measurements, neglecting long-term magnitude and the duration of exposure to elevated LDL-C over time. This study aimed to evaluate the association between LDL-C time in target range (TTR) and the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in two US cohorts.

Methods

This study was a secondary analysis of the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study and the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA) cohorts. LDL-C TTR was defined as the percentage of the area under curve for LDL-C values below 100 mg/dL relative to the total area over the first 4 visits. Association between LDL-C TTR and MACE was estimated using adjusted Cox models and Fine-Gray competing risk models.

Results

Over a mean follow-up of 21.2 ± 8.1 years, 3306 MACE occurred among 16,310 participants. The highest LDL-C TTR quartile was associated with a 25 % reduction in MACE (HR: 0.75, 95 % CI: 0.68 to 0.83), 42 % reduction in myocardial infarction (HR: 0.58, 95 % CI: 0.49 to 0.68), 24 % reduction in stroke (HR: 0.76, 95 % CI: 0.64 to 0.91), and 13 % reduction in CVD death (HR: 0.87, 95 % CI: 0.76 to 1.00; borderline significance). TTR remained significantly associated with MACE after adjusting for mean LDL-C or LDL-C variability, and were robust in competing risk analyses. TTR also outperformed mean LDL-C and LDL-C variability in prognostic value (Akaike information criterion, C-statistics).

Conclusions

LDL-C TTR independently predicts MACE and may offer a more comprehensive assessment of long-term LDL-C control than mean levels or variability, supporting its potential clinical utility.

Abstract Image

低密度脂蛋白胆固醇目标范围时间和主要不良心血管事件风险:两个队列的汇总分析
低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)的传统管理依赖于单点测量,而忽略了长期水平和暴露于高LDL-C的持续时间。本研究旨在评估两个美国队列中LDL-C目标范围内时间(TTR)与主要不良心血管事件(MACE)风险之间的关系。方法本研究是对社区动脉粥样硬化风险(ARIC)研究和多民族动脉粥样硬化研究(MESA)队列的二次分析。LDL-C TTR定义为LDL-C值低于100 mg/dL的曲线下面积相对于前4次就诊总面积的百分比。使用调整后的Cox模型和Fine-Gray竞争风险模型估计LDL-C TTR与MACE之间的关联。结果在平均21.2±8.1年的随访中,16310名参与者发生了3306例MACE。最高LDL-C TTR四分位数与MACE降低25% (HR: 0.75, 95% CI: 0.68至0.83),心肌梗死降低42% (HR: 0.58, 95% CI: 0.49至0.68),卒中降低24% (HR: 0.76, 95% CI: 0.64至0.91),CVD死亡降低13% (HR: 0.87, 95% CI: 0.76至1.00;临界意义)相关。在调整了平均LDL-C或LDL-C变异性后,TTR仍然与MACE显著相关,并且在竞争风险分析中具有很强的相关性。在预后价值方面,TTR也优于LDL-C均值和LDL-C变异性(Akaike信息标准,c -统计)。结论sldl - c TTR独立预测MACE,并可能提供比平均水平或变异性更全面的长期LDL-C控制评估,支持其潜在的临床应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American journal of preventive cardiology
American journal of preventive cardiology Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
76 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信