Exploring common spatial characteristics to integrate ecological and visual landscape qualities: A systematic review and meta-analysis

IF 6.7 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Mei Liu , Yuxiang Zhang
{"title":"Exploring common spatial characteristics to integrate ecological and visual landscape qualities: A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Mei Liu ,&nbsp;Yuxiang Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.ufug.2025.129007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Human interactions with ecosystems primarily occur at a perceptible spatial scale, where visual landscape quality serves as a crucial link between human perception and ecological functions. Although research in environmental psychology and landscape ecology suggests that visual and ecological quality are often correlated through spatial characteristics, their systematic integration remains limited, largely due to disciplinary boundaries and methodological constraints. Visual landscape studies emphasize human perceptual and aesthetic values, often using qualitative assessments, while landscape ecology focuses on ecosystem processes and spatial patterns, typically relying on quantitative analysis. To bridge the above divide, this study conducts a systematic review and meta-analysis to explore shared spatial characteristics, defined as the composition and configuration of landscape elements, that underpin both perspectives. Four common spatial dimensions emerged: naturalness, spaciousness, coherence, and complexity. These abstract dimensions were further translated into measurable landscape metrics, capturing spatial patterns relevant to both ecological function and visual perception. Moreover, a set of spatial metrics collectively address both horizontal and vertical perspectives of landscape structure, encompassing indicators that reflect ecological integrity and visual quality across spatial planes. This research offers a promising framework for understanding shared spatial characteristics and evaluating spatial metrics that concurrently support biodiversity conservation and the maintenance of visually appealing landscapes, thereby fostering harmonious coexistence between humans and wildlife.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49394,"journal":{"name":"Urban Forestry & Urban Greening","volume":"112 ","pages":"Article 129007"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urban Forestry & Urban Greening","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1618866725003413","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Human interactions with ecosystems primarily occur at a perceptible spatial scale, where visual landscape quality serves as a crucial link between human perception and ecological functions. Although research in environmental psychology and landscape ecology suggests that visual and ecological quality are often correlated through spatial characteristics, their systematic integration remains limited, largely due to disciplinary boundaries and methodological constraints. Visual landscape studies emphasize human perceptual and aesthetic values, often using qualitative assessments, while landscape ecology focuses on ecosystem processes and spatial patterns, typically relying on quantitative analysis. To bridge the above divide, this study conducts a systematic review and meta-analysis to explore shared spatial characteristics, defined as the composition and configuration of landscape elements, that underpin both perspectives. Four common spatial dimensions emerged: naturalness, spaciousness, coherence, and complexity. These abstract dimensions were further translated into measurable landscape metrics, capturing spatial patterns relevant to both ecological function and visual perception. Moreover, a set of spatial metrics collectively address both horizontal and vertical perspectives of landscape structure, encompassing indicators that reflect ecological integrity and visual quality across spatial planes. This research offers a promising framework for understanding shared spatial characteristics and evaluating spatial metrics that concurrently support biodiversity conservation and the maintenance of visually appealing landscapes, thereby fostering harmonious coexistence between humans and wildlife.
探索整合生态与视觉景观品质的共同空间特征:系统回顾与元分析
人类与生态系统的相互作用主要发生在可感知的空间尺度上,其中视觉景观质量是人类感知与生态功能之间的关键联系。虽然环境心理学和景观生态学的研究表明,视觉和生态质量往往通过空间特征相关联,但它们的系统整合仍然有限,主要是由于学科界限和方法的限制。视觉景观研究强调人的感性和审美价值,通常采用定性评价,而景观生态学侧重于生态系统过程和空间格局,通常依赖于定量分析。为了弥合上述分歧,本研究进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析,以探索支撑两种观点的共同空间特征,即景观要素的组成和配置。四个常见的空间维度出现了:自然性、空间性、连贯性和复杂性。这些抽象的维度被进一步转化为可测量的景观指标,捕捉与生态功能和视觉感知相关的空间格局。此外,一组空间指标共同解决了景观结构的水平和垂直角度,包括反映生态完整性和视觉质量的指标。该研究为理解共同的空间特征和评估空间指标提供了一个有希望的框架,这些指标同时支持生物多样性保护和视觉吸引力景观的维护,从而促进人类与野生动物之间的和谐共处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.70
自引率
12.50%
发文量
289
审稿时长
70 days
期刊介绍: Urban Forestry and Urban Greening is a refereed, international journal aimed at presenting high-quality research with urban and peri-urban woody and non-woody vegetation and its use, planning, design, establishment and management as its main topics. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening concentrates on all tree-dominated (as joint together in the urban forest) as well as other green resources in and around urban areas, such as woodlands, public and private urban parks and gardens, urban nature areas, street tree and square plantations, botanical gardens and cemeteries. The journal welcomes basic and applied research papers, as well as review papers and short communications. Contributions should focus on one or more of the following aspects: -Form and functions of urban forests and other vegetation, including aspects of urban ecology. -Policy-making, planning and design related to urban forests and other vegetation. -Selection and establishment of tree resources and other vegetation for urban environments. -Management of urban forests and other vegetation. Original contributions of a high academic standard are invited from a wide range of disciplines and fields, including forestry, biology, horticulture, arboriculture, landscape ecology, pathology, soil science, hydrology, landscape architecture, landscape planning, urban planning and design, economics, sociology, environmental psychology, public health, and education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信