{"title":"Exploring common spatial characteristics to integrate ecological and visual landscape qualities: A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Mei Liu , Yuxiang Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.ufug.2025.129007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Human interactions with ecosystems primarily occur at a perceptible spatial scale, where visual landscape quality serves as a crucial link between human perception and ecological functions. Although research in environmental psychology and landscape ecology suggests that visual and ecological quality are often correlated through spatial characteristics, their systematic integration remains limited, largely due to disciplinary boundaries and methodological constraints. Visual landscape studies emphasize human perceptual and aesthetic values, often using qualitative assessments, while landscape ecology focuses on ecosystem processes and spatial patterns, typically relying on quantitative analysis. To bridge the above divide, this study conducts a systematic review and meta-analysis to explore shared spatial characteristics, defined as the composition and configuration of landscape elements, that underpin both perspectives. Four common spatial dimensions emerged: naturalness, spaciousness, coherence, and complexity. These abstract dimensions were further translated into measurable landscape metrics, capturing spatial patterns relevant to both ecological function and visual perception. Moreover, a set of spatial metrics collectively address both horizontal and vertical perspectives of landscape structure, encompassing indicators that reflect ecological integrity and visual quality across spatial planes. This research offers a promising framework for understanding shared spatial characteristics and evaluating spatial metrics that concurrently support biodiversity conservation and the maintenance of visually appealing landscapes, thereby fostering harmonious coexistence between humans and wildlife.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49394,"journal":{"name":"Urban Forestry & Urban Greening","volume":"112 ","pages":"Article 129007"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urban Forestry & Urban Greening","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1618866725003413","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Human interactions with ecosystems primarily occur at a perceptible spatial scale, where visual landscape quality serves as a crucial link between human perception and ecological functions. Although research in environmental psychology and landscape ecology suggests that visual and ecological quality are often correlated through spatial characteristics, their systematic integration remains limited, largely due to disciplinary boundaries and methodological constraints. Visual landscape studies emphasize human perceptual and aesthetic values, often using qualitative assessments, while landscape ecology focuses on ecosystem processes and spatial patterns, typically relying on quantitative analysis. To bridge the above divide, this study conducts a systematic review and meta-analysis to explore shared spatial characteristics, defined as the composition and configuration of landscape elements, that underpin both perspectives. Four common spatial dimensions emerged: naturalness, spaciousness, coherence, and complexity. These abstract dimensions were further translated into measurable landscape metrics, capturing spatial patterns relevant to both ecological function and visual perception. Moreover, a set of spatial metrics collectively address both horizontal and vertical perspectives of landscape structure, encompassing indicators that reflect ecological integrity and visual quality across spatial planes. This research offers a promising framework for understanding shared spatial characteristics and evaluating spatial metrics that concurrently support biodiversity conservation and the maintenance of visually appealing landscapes, thereby fostering harmonious coexistence between humans and wildlife.
期刊介绍:
Urban Forestry and Urban Greening is a refereed, international journal aimed at presenting high-quality research with urban and peri-urban woody and non-woody vegetation and its use, planning, design, establishment and management as its main topics. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening concentrates on all tree-dominated (as joint together in the urban forest) as well as other green resources in and around urban areas, such as woodlands, public and private urban parks and gardens, urban nature areas, street tree and square plantations, botanical gardens and cemeteries.
The journal welcomes basic and applied research papers, as well as review papers and short communications. Contributions should focus on one or more of the following aspects:
-Form and functions of urban forests and other vegetation, including aspects of urban ecology.
-Policy-making, planning and design related to urban forests and other vegetation.
-Selection and establishment of tree resources and other vegetation for urban environments.
-Management of urban forests and other vegetation.
Original contributions of a high academic standard are invited from a wide range of disciplines and fields, including forestry, biology, horticulture, arboriculture, landscape ecology, pathology, soil science, hydrology, landscape architecture, landscape planning, urban planning and design, economics, sociology, environmental psychology, public health, and education.