Post‐liberalism and the politics of liberation: Brazilian favelas as emergent territories of freedom

IF 1.1 2区 社会学 Q2 ANTHROPOLOGY
Moises Lino e Silva
{"title":"Post‐liberalism and the politics of liberation: Brazilian favelas as emergent territories of freedom","authors":"Moises Lino e Silva","doi":"10.1111/1467-9655.14319","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Brazilian favelas (shantytowns) are often considered as marginalized urban territories that must be better integrated into the nation‐state to obtain legitimacy under the Rule of Law. Based on years of fieldwork in one of the largest shantytowns in Rio de Janeiro (Rocinha), this article suggests that the absence of a (normative) liberal apparatus in favelas is not necessarily a political deficiency, but evidence of post‐liberalism. Can favela dwellers speak outside (or despite) the current nation‐state framework of rationality and liberalism? Can they speak of their own freedoms? Some frameworks insist on representing favela dwellers exclusively as victims of structural violence. In these, the possibility that freedoms and liberties can exist beyond a (normative) liberal framework is often ignored. I consider the genealogy of Brazilian favelas beyond the established tropes of poverty and suffering, indicating that the history of favelas is enmeshed in political experiments with liberation. Ethnographic evidence demonstrates that public reason, justice, and freedom can take unexpected forms in the favela. The ‘dangers of romanticizing poverty’ and the political effects of representing favela dwellers as political agents entitled to freedom are also considered. I conclude that more than satisfying (normative) liberal sensibilities, we could foster a more ‘indexical’ mode of representation as a collaborative strategy for liberation.","PeriodicalId":47904,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute","volume":"67 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9655.14319","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Brazilian favelas (shantytowns) are often considered as marginalized urban territories that must be better integrated into the nation‐state to obtain legitimacy under the Rule of Law. Based on years of fieldwork in one of the largest shantytowns in Rio de Janeiro (Rocinha), this article suggests that the absence of a (normative) liberal apparatus in favelas is not necessarily a political deficiency, but evidence of post‐liberalism. Can favela dwellers speak outside (or despite) the current nation‐state framework of rationality and liberalism? Can they speak of their own freedoms? Some frameworks insist on representing favela dwellers exclusively as victims of structural violence. In these, the possibility that freedoms and liberties can exist beyond a (normative) liberal framework is often ignored. I consider the genealogy of Brazilian favelas beyond the established tropes of poverty and suffering, indicating that the history of favelas is enmeshed in political experiments with liberation. Ethnographic evidence demonstrates that public reason, justice, and freedom can take unexpected forms in the favela. The ‘dangers of romanticizing poverty’ and the political effects of representing favela dwellers as political agents entitled to freedom are also considered. I conclude that more than satisfying (normative) liberal sensibilities, we could foster a more ‘indexical’ mode of representation as a collaborative strategy for liberation.
后自由主义与解放政治:巴西贫民窟作为新兴的自由领土
巴西的贫民窟(棚户区)通常被认为是边缘化的城市领土,必须更好地融入民族国家,以获得法治下的合法性。基于对巴西里约热内卢(Rocinha)最大的棚区之一的多年实地调查,本文认为,贫民窟缺乏(规范的)自由主义机构并不一定是政治缺陷,而是后自由主义的证据。贫民窟居民能否在当前理性与自由主义的民族国家框架之外(或尽管如此)发表言论?他们能谈论自己的自由吗?一些框架坚持将贫民窟居民只代表为结构性暴力的受害者。在这些观点中,自由和自由可以在(规范的)自由主义框架之外存在的可能性往往被忽视。我认为巴西贫民窟的谱系超越了贫穷和苦难的既定比喻,表明贫民窟的历史与解放的政治实验息息相关。人种学证据表明,公共理性、正义和自由可以在贫民窟以意想不到的形式出现。“浪漫化贫困的危险”和代表贫民窟居民作为有权享有自由的政治代理人的政治影响也被考虑在内。我的结论是,除了满足(规范的)自由主义情感,我们还可以培养一种更“指数化”的代表模式,作为一种解放的合作策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
8.30%
发文量
175
期刊介绍: The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute is the principal journal of the oldest anthropological organization in the world. It has attracted and inspired some of the world"s greatest thinkers. International in scope, it presents accessible papers aimed at a broad anthropological readership. It is also acclaimed for its extensive book review section, and it publishes a bibliography of books received.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信