Kateryna Krynychka,Goni Katz-Greenberg,Jennifer S Byrns,Brian I Shaw,Nrupen A Bhavsar,Ursula Rogers,Annette M Jackson,Matthew J Ellis,Xunrong Luo,Allan D Kirk
{"title":"Off-Label Use of Alemtuzumab, Belatacept, and Rapamycin in Kidney Transplantation - Long-Term Real-World Experience.","authors":"Kateryna Krynychka,Goni Katz-Greenberg,Jennifer S Byrns,Brian I Shaw,Nrupen A Bhavsar,Ursula Rogers,Annette M Jackson,Matthew J Ellis,Xunrong Luo,Allan D Kirk","doi":"10.1016/j.ajt.2025.09.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Conventional immunosuppressive regimens in kidney transplantation continue to pose significant challenges, largely due to their reliance on calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) and corticosteroids. These challenges have driven the search for alternative regimens to minimize toxicity and preserve long-term graft function. In this study, we present real-world data utilizing a CNI-free regimen that makes use of the synergistic effects of costimulation blockade and mTOR inhibition. We retrospectively analyzed 106 kidney recipients from 2016 to 2024 who received alemtuzumab induction, followed by de novo belatacept and sirolimus maintenance therapy (ABR regimen). Patient and graft survival were 100% at one year and 96 and 97% respectively at 5 years. At 3 and 5 years, median GFR was 64mL/min/1.73m2 (IQR 54-75) and 62mL/min/1.73m2 (54-74), respectively. The rate of rejection in the first year was 6.6%. Ninety-six patients (91%) avoided treatment with CNIs during the follow-up period. Alemtuzumab and belatacept were well tolerated, but 44% of patients discontinued sirolimus, typically due to sirolimus-related side-effects remedied with conversion to mycophenolate and prednisone. These results inform and support the study of the ABR protocol, or similar costimulation blockade-based regimens, in pursuit of non-CNI-based therapies for kidney transplant recipients.","PeriodicalId":123,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Transplantation","volume":"47 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajt.2025.09.004","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Conventional immunosuppressive regimens in kidney transplantation continue to pose significant challenges, largely due to their reliance on calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) and corticosteroids. These challenges have driven the search for alternative regimens to minimize toxicity and preserve long-term graft function. In this study, we present real-world data utilizing a CNI-free regimen that makes use of the synergistic effects of costimulation blockade and mTOR inhibition. We retrospectively analyzed 106 kidney recipients from 2016 to 2024 who received alemtuzumab induction, followed by de novo belatacept and sirolimus maintenance therapy (ABR regimen). Patient and graft survival were 100% at one year and 96 and 97% respectively at 5 years. At 3 and 5 years, median GFR was 64mL/min/1.73m2 (IQR 54-75) and 62mL/min/1.73m2 (54-74), respectively. The rate of rejection in the first year was 6.6%. Ninety-six patients (91%) avoided treatment with CNIs during the follow-up period. Alemtuzumab and belatacept were well tolerated, but 44% of patients discontinued sirolimus, typically due to sirolimus-related side-effects remedied with conversion to mycophenolate and prednisone. These results inform and support the study of the ABR protocol, or similar costimulation blockade-based regimens, in pursuit of non-CNI-based therapies for kidney transplant recipients.
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Transplantation is a leading journal in the field of transplantation. It serves as a forum for debate and reassessment, an agent of change, and a major platform for promoting understanding, improving results, and advancing science. Published monthly, it provides an essential resource for researchers and clinicians worldwide.
The journal publishes original articles, case reports, invited reviews, letters to the editor, critical reviews, news features, consensus documents, and guidelines over 12 issues a year. It covers all major subject areas in transplantation, including thoracic (heart, lung), abdominal (kidney, liver, pancreas, islets), tissue and stem cell transplantation, organ and tissue donation and preservation, tissue injury, repair, inflammation, and aging, histocompatibility, drugs and pharmacology, graft survival, and prevention of graft dysfunction and failure. It also explores ethical and social issues in the field.