Rocker shoe apex settings do not induce anticipatory changes in foot progression angle before the onset of the second rocker.

IF 2.4
R R Kurnianto, J M Hijmans, C Greve, H Houdijk
{"title":"Rocker shoe apex settings do not induce anticipatory changes in foot progression angle before the onset of the second rocker.","authors":"R R Kurnianto, J M Hijmans, C Greve, H Houdijk","doi":"10.1016/j.gaitpost.2025.09.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Rocker shoes are commonly prescribed to treat different types of foot pathology. It is clinically recommended to align the rocker axis perpendicular to the gait progression line to prevent foot progression angle (FPA) adjustments, which may increase lower limb joint load and reduce gait efficiency.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study investigated the relationship between rocker shoe apex angle (AA) and apex position (AP) and FPA during second and third rocker in normal gait.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Rocker shoes with nine combinations of AP (54 %, 64 %, 74 % of shoe length) and AA (60°, 90°, 120°) were tested in ten healthy young adults. FPA was measured using 3D motion capture and analyzed with one-dimensional statistical parametric mapping. Secondary outcomes included center of pressure (COP) trajectories, foot floor angle, and ankle dorsiflexion angle.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant effect of AP or AA on FPA was found during the second rocker. A main effect of AA was observed in the third rocker (52.4-57.5 % gait cycle; p = 0.039), and an AP-AA interaction occurred near toe-off (62.2-70.3 %; p = 0.026). COP trajectory was significantly affected by AA (p < 0.001) and AP (p = 0.01).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Contrary to clinical assumptions, individuals did not make anticipatory adjustments in FPA before the onset of the second rocker to align the rocker axis with the line of progression, which prompted small changes of FPA in the third rocker. Therefore, clinicians should not refrain from manipulating AA in fear of unwanted FPA adaptations.</p>","PeriodicalId":94018,"journal":{"name":"Gait & posture","volume":" ","pages":"109967"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gait & posture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2025.09.001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Rocker shoes are commonly prescribed to treat different types of foot pathology. It is clinically recommended to align the rocker axis perpendicular to the gait progression line to prevent foot progression angle (FPA) adjustments, which may increase lower limb joint load and reduce gait efficiency.

Aim: This study investigated the relationship between rocker shoe apex angle (AA) and apex position (AP) and FPA during second and third rocker in normal gait.

Methods: Rocker shoes with nine combinations of AP (54 %, 64 %, 74 % of shoe length) and AA (60°, 90°, 120°) were tested in ten healthy young adults. FPA was measured using 3D motion capture and analyzed with one-dimensional statistical parametric mapping. Secondary outcomes included center of pressure (COP) trajectories, foot floor angle, and ankle dorsiflexion angle.

Results: No significant effect of AP or AA on FPA was found during the second rocker. A main effect of AA was observed in the third rocker (52.4-57.5 % gait cycle; p = 0.039), and an AP-AA interaction occurred near toe-off (62.2-70.3 %; p = 0.026). COP trajectory was significantly affected by AA (p < 0.001) and AP (p = 0.01).

Discussion: Contrary to clinical assumptions, individuals did not make anticipatory adjustments in FPA before the onset of the second rocker to align the rocker axis with the line of progression, which prompted small changes of FPA in the third rocker. Therefore, clinicians should not refrain from manipulating AA in fear of unwanted FPA adaptations.

摇杆鞋顶点设置不诱导预期的变化,在脚进程角度的第二个摇杆的发作之前。
背景:摇椅鞋通常用于治疗不同类型的足部病理。临床上建议将摇杆轴线垂直于步态进展线,以防止足部进展角(FPA)调整,这会增加下肢关节负荷,降低步态效率。目的:研究正常步态下第二、三次摇椅时摇椅鞋尖角(AA)、顶点位置(AP)和FPA的关系。方法:对10名健康青年进行9种组合的Rocker鞋,分别为AP(鞋长54 %、64 %、74 %)和AA(鞋长60°、90°、120°)。FPA测量采用三维运动捕捉,分析采用一维统计参数映射。次要结果包括压力中心(COP)轨迹、足底角和踝关节背屈角。结果:在第二次摇床过程中,AP和AA对FPA无显著影响。AA的主要作用发生在第三个摇杆(52.4-57.5 %,p = 0.039),AP-AA的相互作用发生在脚趾附近(62.2-70.3 %,p = 0.026)。讨论:与临床假设相反,个体在第二个摇杆开始前没有对FPA进行预期调整,以使摇杆轴与前进线对齐,这促使第三个摇杆的FPA发生微小变化。因此,临床医生不应该因为担心不必要的FPA适应而避免操纵AA。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信