The difference in the ability to perceive danger while driving and when crossing a road between patients after a stroke and a healthy population.

IF 1.9 3区 工程技术 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Amit Timor, Tova Rosenbloom, Navah Z Ratzon
{"title":"The difference in the ability to perceive danger while driving and when crossing a road between patients after a stroke and a healthy population.","authors":"Amit Timor, Tova Rosenbloom, Navah Z Ratzon","doi":"10.1080/15389588.2025.2492347","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Post-stroke patients' health conditions may have consequences on their ability to drive and walk safely as pedestrians. There are many studies on the driving ability of people after stroke, but hardly any research testing their hazard perception both as drivers and pedestrians. The main goals of this study were (a) to test the differences in hazard perception when crossing the road and driving between post-stroke participants and a control group of healthy individuals; (b) to evaluate whether skills for safe driving are correlated with safe road-crossing skills as pedestrians.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study compared 30 post-stroke adults and 28 healthy age-matched controls. All participants were assessed using computerized tools to detect hazard perception both as drivers and pedestrians. Participants also completed questionnaires designed to classify their behavior as drivers and pedestrians.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was a significant difference in the hazard perception of pedestrians between post-stroke patients and controls, and a significant difference in their behavior. Post-stroke patients identified fewer hazards as pedestrians than the controls and reported fewer errors and aggressiveness incidences as drivers. The findings also show a strong significant correlation between their hazard perception as drivers and as pedestrians. The findings also show a significant correlation between their hazard perception as drivers and as pedestrians.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>It is important to evaluate the hazard perception of potential drivers and pedestrians after a stroke. These assessments provide valuable indications of the patients' driving capability and their ability to cross the road safely. The correlation we found between the ability to detect hazards while watching videos of driving and crossing the road shows that clinicians need to pay special attention both to the ability to drive and to alternative ways of moving as pedestrians.</p>","PeriodicalId":54422,"journal":{"name":"Traffic Injury Prevention","volume":" ","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Traffic Injury Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15389588.2025.2492347","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Post-stroke patients' health conditions may have consequences on their ability to drive and walk safely as pedestrians. There are many studies on the driving ability of people after stroke, but hardly any research testing their hazard perception both as drivers and pedestrians. The main goals of this study were (a) to test the differences in hazard perception when crossing the road and driving between post-stroke participants and a control group of healthy individuals; (b) to evaluate whether skills for safe driving are correlated with safe road-crossing skills as pedestrians.

Methods: This cross-sectional study compared 30 post-stroke adults and 28 healthy age-matched controls. All participants were assessed using computerized tools to detect hazard perception both as drivers and pedestrians. Participants also completed questionnaires designed to classify their behavior as drivers and pedestrians.

Results: There was a significant difference in the hazard perception of pedestrians between post-stroke patients and controls, and a significant difference in their behavior. Post-stroke patients identified fewer hazards as pedestrians than the controls and reported fewer errors and aggressiveness incidences as drivers. The findings also show a strong significant correlation between their hazard perception as drivers and as pedestrians. The findings also show a significant correlation between their hazard perception as drivers and as pedestrians.

Conclusions: It is important to evaluate the hazard perception of potential drivers and pedestrians after a stroke. These assessments provide valuable indications of the patients' driving capability and their ability to cross the road safely. The correlation we found between the ability to detect hazards while watching videos of driving and crossing the road shows that clinicians need to pay special attention both to the ability to drive and to alternative ways of moving as pedestrians.

中风患者和健康人群在驾驶和过马路时感知危险能力的差异。
目的:脑卒中后患者的健康状况可能对其驾驶和行人安全行走的能力产生影响。目前对脑卒中后驾驶能力的研究较多,但对其作为驾驶员和行人的危险感知能力进行测试的研究却很少。本研究的主要目的是:(a)测试中风后参与者与健康对照组在过马路和开车时危险感知的差异;(b)评估安全驾驶技能与行人安全过马路技能是否相关。方法:这项横断面研究比较了30名中风后的成年人和28名年龄匹配的健康对照。所有参与者都使用计算机化工具进行评估,以检测驾驶员和行人的危险感知。参与者还完成了问卷调查,将他们作为司机和行人的行为进行分类。结果:脑卒中后行人的危险感知与对照组存在显著差异,其行为也存在显著差异。中风后患者作为行人比对照组识别出更少的危险,作为司机报告的错误和攻击性事件也更少。研究结果还表明,他们作为司机和行人的危险感知之间存在着强烈的显著相关性。研究结果还显示,他们作为司机和行人的危险感知之间存在显著的相关性。结论:卒中后潜在驾驶员和行人的危险感知评价具有重要意义。这些评估为患者的驾驶能力和安全过马路的能力提供了有价值的指示。我们发现,在观看驾驶视频和过马路时检测危险的能力之间存在相关性,这表明临床医生需要特别注意驾驶能力和行人的其他移动方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Traffic Injury Prevention
Traffic Injury Prevention PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
10.00%
发文量
137
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The purpose of Traffic Injury Prevention is to bridge the disciplines of medicine, engineering, public health and traffic safety in order to foster the science of traffic injury prevention. The archival journal focuses on research, interventions and evaluations within the areas of traffic safety, crash causation, injury prevention and treatment. General topics within the journal''s scope are driver behavior, road infrastructure, emerging crash avoidance technologies, crash and injury epidemiology, alcohol and drugs, impact injury biomechanics, vehicle crashworthiness, occupant restraints, pedestrian safety, evaluation of interventions, economic consequences and emergency and clinical care with specific application to traffic injury prevention. The journal includes full length papers, review articles, case studies, brief technical notes and commentaries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信