Value of extreme left axis deviation in patients with complete left bundle branch block

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Guido Vannoni MD, Carlos D. Labadet MD, Giuliana Caminotti MD, Bárbara Zambudio MD, Juan M. Fiamengo Tch, Lucas N. Campana MD, María V. Vannoni MD, Gerardo M. Marambio MD, Jorge A. Lax MD, Juan A. Gagliardi MD, PhD
{"title":"Value of extreme left axis deviation in patients with complete left bundle branch block","authors":"Guido Vannoni MD,&nbsp;Carlos D. Labadet MD,&nbsp;Giuliana Caminotti MD,&nbsp;Bárbara Zambudio MD,&nbsp;Juan M. Fiamengo Tch,&nbsp;Lucas N. Campana MD,&nbsp;María V. Vannoni MD,&nbsp;Gerardo M. Marambio MD,&nbsp;Jorge A. Lax MD,&nbsp;Juan A. Gagliardi MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2025.103174","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Complete left bundle branch block (LBBB) is associated with increased risk of cardiovascular events. The value of extreme deviation of the QRS axis to the left (LAD) in the context of LBBB is controversial.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To evaluate whether LAD (-45°) in patients with LBBB is a marker of systolic dysfunction and ventricular remodeling.</div></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><div>Cross-sectional cohort study including 102 patients with LBBB who underwent echocardiography to assess left ventricular (LV) diameters, wall thickness and ejection fraction (EF).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Mean age was 67.9 ± 13 years. 48 % were women. 80.4 % met Strauss criteria for LBBB and 28.4 % had LAD. The LAD group showed lower EF (32.2 ± 12 % vs. 46.7 ± 17 %, p = 0.00009) and higher LV end-diastolic diameter index (34.8 ± 9 vs. 30.9 ± 6, p = 0.011). LAD had 45 % sensitivity, 88 % specificity, positive predictive value of 0.79 and negative predictive value of 0.62 for identifying reduced EF. Cardiomyopathy diagnosis was more frequent in the LAD group (93.1 % vs. 61.6 %; p = 0.0016). LV hypertrophy prevalence was similar between groups, but LAD patients had higher prevalence of eccentric LV hypertrophy.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>In LBBB, LAD (-45°) identifies patients with worse systolic function, greater degree of LV dilatation, and more eccentric hypertrophy. Additionally, cardiomyopathy prevalence was higher in this population.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51006,"journal":{"name":"Current Problems in Cardiology","volume":"50 11","pages":"Article 103174"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Problems in Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0146280625001938","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Complete left bundle branch block (LBBB) is associated with increased risk of cardiovascular events. The value of extreme deviation of the QRS axis to the left (LAD) in the context of LBBB is controversial.

Objective

To evaluate whether LAD (-45°) in patients with LBBB is a marker of systolic dysfunction and ventricular remodeling.

Material and methods

Cross-sectional cohort study including 102 patients with LBBB who underwent echocardiography to assess left ventricular (LV) diameters, wall thickness and ejection fraction (EF).

Results

Mean age was 67.9 ± 13 years. 48 % were women. 80.4 % met Strauss criteria for LBBB and 28.4 % had LAD. The LAD group showed lower EF (32.2 ± 12 % vs. 46.7 ± 17 %, p = 0.00009) and higher LV end-diastolic diameter index (34.8 ± 9 vs. 30.9 ± 6, p = 0.011). LAD had 45 % sensitivity, 88 % specificity, positive predictive value of 0.79 and negative predictive value of 0.62 for identifying reduced EF. Cardiomyopathy diagnosis was more frequent in the LAD group (93.1 % vs. 61.6 %; p = 0.0016). LV hypertrophy prevalence was similar between groups, but LAD patients had higher prevalence of eccentric LV hypertrophy.

Conclusion

In LBBB, LAD (-45°) identifies patients with worse systolic function, greater degree of LV dilatation, and more eccentric hypertrophy. Additionally, cardiomyopathy prevalence was higher in this population.
完全性左束支传导阻滞患者左轴极值偏移的价值。
完全性左束支阻滞(LBBB)与心血管事件风险增加相关。在LBBB的情况下,QRS轴向左极端偏差(LAD)的值是有争议的。目的:评价LBBB患者LAD(-45°)是否为收缩功能障碍和心室重构的标志。材料和方法:横断面队列研究包括102例LBBB患者,接受超声心动图评估左室(LV)直径、壁厚和射血分数(EF)。结果:平均年龄67.9±13岁。48%是女性。80.4%符合Strauss LBBB标准,28.4%有LAD。LAD组EF降低(32.2±12%比46.7±17%,p=0.00009),左室舒张末期内径指数升高(34.8±9比30.9±6,p=0.011)。LAD对EF的敏感性为45%,特异性为88%,阳性预测值为0.79,阴性预测值为0.62。LAD组心肌病的诊断频率更高(93.1%比61.6%;p=0.0016)。各组间左室肥厚发生率相似,但LAD患者偏心性左室肥厚发生率较高。结论:在LBBB中,LAD(-45°)识别收缩功能较差、左室扩张程度较大、偏心性肥厚较多的患者。此外,该人群的心肌病患病率较高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current Problems in Cardiology
Current Problems in Cardiology 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
2.40%
发文量
392
审稿时长
6 days
期刊介绍: Under the editorial leadership of noted cardiologist Dr. Hector O. Ventura, Current Problems in Cardiology provides focused, comprehensive coverage of important clinical topics in cardiology. Each monthly issues, addresses a selected clinical problem or condition, including pathophysiology, invasive and noninvasive diagnosis, drug therapy, surgical management, and rehabilitation; or explores the clinical applications of a diagnostic modality or a particular category of drugs. Critical commentary from the distinguished editorial board accompanies each monograph, providing readers with additional insights. An extensive bibliography in each issue saves hours of library research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信