Sidonia E Compton, Troy A Webber, Steven Paul Woods, Andrew M Kiselica
{"title":"Reliability and stability of cognitive intraindividual variability indices among cognitively unimpaired older adults.","authors":"Sidonia E Compton, Troy A Webber, Steven Paul Woods, Andrew M Kiselica","doi":"10.1080/13854046.2025.2552279","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> Cognitive intraindividual variability (IIV) dispersion measures within-person variability in performance across a neuropsychological test battery and is prognostic of structural and functional decline. Although evidence for the construct validity of cognitive dispersion has grown considerably, its utility in applied settings relies on its stability and reliability. Thus, we examined mean-level stability, test-retest reliability, and reliable change of several cognitive dispersion indices among cognitively unimpaired older adults. <b>Method:</b> Participants were 2224 robustly cognitively unimpaired older adults from the National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center (NACC) Uniform Data Set 3.0. Intraindividual standard deviation (<i>ISD</i>) and coefficient of variation (<i>CoV</i>) dispersion indices were calculated for raw, scaled, and demographically-adjusted normed scores for the neuropsychological test battery at baseline and initial follow-up visit (<i>M</i><sub>days</sub> = 424.99). Analyses included paired samples <i>t</i>-tests and generation of effect sizes for mean-level stability, correlations for test-retest reliability, and practice-adjusted reliable change indices (RCIs) for classifying individuals. <b>Results:</b> The mean-level change effect sizes for <i>ISD</i> and <i>CoV</i> scores were very small (<i>ds</i> < .06); only <i>CoV</i> showed significant improvements. Test-retest reliability was poor (<i>M<sub>r</sub> =</i> .41) for cognitive dispersion indices compared to global composite scores (<i>r</i> = .82). RCIs suggested that normed score changes greater than 1.75 standard deviations were significant. <b>Conclusions:</b> Findings showed stable mean-level cognitive dispersion across 424.99 days; however, consistent with process-based neuropsychological test scores literature, test-retest reliability was poor, perhaps reflecting random measurement error among cognitively unimpaired individuals. Change in cognitive dispersion may inform clinical prognosis and serve as supplementary information within broader neuropsychological evaluations given reliability limitations.</p>","PeriodicalId":55250,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Neuropsychologist","volume":" ","pages":"1-19"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Neuropsychologist","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2025.2552279","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: Cognitive intraindividual variability (IIV) dispersion measures within-person variability in performance across a neuropsychological test battery and is prognostic of structural and functional decline. Although evidence for the construct validity of cognitive dispersion has grown considerably, its utility in applied settings relies on its stability and reliability. Thus, we examined mean-level stability, test-retest reliability, and reliable change of several cognitive dispersion indices among cognitively unimpaired older adults. Method: Participants were 2224 robustly cognitively unimpaired older adults from the National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center (NACC) Uniform Data Set 3.0. Intraindividual standard deviation (ISD) and coefficient of variation (CoV) dispersion indices were calculated for raw, scaled, and demographically-adjusted normed scores for the neuropsychological test battery at baseline and initial follow-up visit (Mdays = 424.99). Analyses included paired samples t-tests and generation of effect sizes for mean-level stability, correlations for test-retest reliability, and practice-adjusted reliable change indices (RCIs) for classifying individuals. Results: The mean-level change effect sizes for ISD and CoV scores were very small (ds < .06); only CoV showed significant improvements. Test-retest reliability was poor (Mr = .41) for cognitive dispersion indices compared to global composite scores (r = .82). RCIs suggested that normed score changes greater than 1.75 standard deviations were significant. Conclusions: Findings showed stable mean-level cognitive dispersion across 424.99 days; however, consistent with process-based neuropsychological test scores literature, test-retest reliability was poor, perhaps reflecting random measurement error among cognitively unimpaired individuals. Change in cognitive dispersion may inform clinical prognosis and serve as supplementary information within broader neuropsychological evaluations given reliability limitations.
期刊介绍：
The Clinical Neuropsychologist (TCN) serves as the premier forum for (1) state-of-the-art clinically-relevant scientific research, (2) in-depth professional discussions of matters germane to evidence-based practice, and (3) clinical case studies in neuropsychology. Of particular interest are papers that can make definitive statements about a given topic (thereby having implications for the standards of clinical practice) and those with the potential to expand today’s clinical frontiers. Research on all age groups, and on both clinical and normal populations, is considered.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
