Improving Perinatal Palliative Care in the Communities: A Regional Population-Based Study.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Maternal and Child Health Journal Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-13 DOI:10.1007/s10995-025-04162-y
Kohei Takashima, Masahito Hitosugi, Masahito Yamamoto, Yoshihiro Maruo
{"title":"Improving Perinatal Palliative Care in the Communities: A Regional Population-Based Study.","authors":"Kohei Takashima, Masahito Hitosugi, Masahito Yamamoto, Yoshihiro Maruo","doi":"10.1007/s10995-025-04162-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Perinatal palliative care, defined as support for creating birth plans that include treatment and care decisions, is crucial for families facing life-threatening fetal conditions. However, the variability in medical resources across communities necessitates the development of tailored, community-based perinatal palliative care systems that support shared decision-making through multidisciplinary care. This study uses child death review (CDR) data to examine the current status and challenges of perinatal palliative care delivery in regional communities, focusing on decision-making processes, care planning, and transition to home care. It also compares cases in which families selected comfort care with those choosing intensive care to explore differences in care processes and outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study was conducted using regional CDR data from children under 18 years who died in Shiga Prefecture, Japan, between 2018 and 2020. Data on children eligible for perinatal palliative care were primarily collected from perinatal centers and perinatal cooperative hospitals participating in the CDR.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 131 deaths, 19 involved life-threatening conditions considered for perinatal palliative care. Two lacked prenatal diagnoses, while 17 discussed care plans, including medical intervention options, and mode of delivery. Of these, 65% (11/17) chose comfort care, while 35% (6/17) opted for intensive care. A comparison between these groups showed that the comfort care group had a longer decision-making period (median, 29 vs. 9 days; p = 0.044). Decision support before birth, which included accurate information about fetal conditions, care planning options, and psychological support, was not provided by clinical psychologists or palliative care specialists. Of the 17, four patients were discharged home, and one died at home.</p><p><strong>Conclusions for practice: </strong>This study highlights the challenges of implementing perinatal palliative care in communities. The prolonged decision-making process associated with comfort care may reflect the significant psychological burden on families. Factors such as care plans influence family burden, emphasizing the need for individualized support. The absence of specialized support and low rates of transition to home care for end-of-life care are critical issue for improvement in community-based perinatal palliative care.</p>","PeriodicalId":48367,"journal":{"name":"Maternal and Child Health Journal","volume":" ","pages":"1379-1386"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12484261/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Maternal and Child Health Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-025-04162-y","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Perinatal palliative care, defined as support for creating birth plans that include treatment and care decisions, is crucial for families facing life-threatening fetal conditions. However, the variability in medical resources across communities necessitates the development of tailored, community-based perinatal palliative care systems that support shared decision-making through multidisciplinary care. This study uses child death review (CDR) data to examine the current status and challenges of perinatal palliative care delivery in regional communities, focusing on decision-making processes, care planning, and transition to home care. It also compares cases in which families selected comfort care with those choosing intensive care to explore differences in care processes and outcomes.

Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using regional CDR data from children under 18 years who died in Shiga Prefecture, Japan, between 2018 and 2020. Data on children eligible for perinatal palliative care were primarily collected from perinatal centers and perinatal cooperative hospitals participating in the CDR.

Results: Among 131 deaths, 19 involved life-threatening conditions considered for perinatal palliative care. Two lacked prenatal diagnoses, while 17 discussed care plans, including medical intervention options, and mode of delivery. Of these, 65% (11/17) chose comfort care, while 35% (6/17) opted for intensive care. A comparison between these groups showed that the comfort care group had a longer decision-making period (median, 29 vs. 9 days; p = 0.044). Decision support before birth, which included accurate information about fetal conditions, care planning options, and psychological support, was not provided by clinical psychologists or palliative care specialists. Of the 17, four patients were discharged home, and one died at home.

Conclusions for practice: This study highlights the challenges of implementing perinatal palliative care in communities. The prolonged decision-making process associated with comfort care may reflect the significant psychological burden on families. Factors such as care plans influence family burden, emphasizing the need for individualized support. The absence of specialized support and low rates of transition to home care for end-of-life care are critical issue for improvement in community-based perinatal palliative care.

改善社区围产期姑息治疗:一项基于区域人口的研究。
目的:围产期姑息治疗,定义为支持制定包括治疗和护理决定的生育计划,对面临危及生命的胎儿状况的家庭至关重要。然而,各社区医疗资源的可变性要求开发量身定制的、以社区为基础的围产期姑息治疗系统,通过多学科护理支持共同决策。本研究使用儿童死亡回顾(CDR)数据来检查区域社区围产期姑息治疗提供的现状和挑战,重点关注决策过程、护理计划和向家庭护理的过渡。它还比较了家庭选择舒适护理与选择重症监护的情况,以探索护理过程和结果的差异。方法:对2018 - 2020年日本滋贺县18岁以下死亡儿童的区域CDR数据进行回顾性队列研究。有资格接受围产期姑息治疗的儿童的数据主要从参与CDR的围产期中心和围产期合作医院收集。结果:在131例死亡中,19例涉及危及生命的疾病,考虑进行围产期姑息治疗。其中两份没有产前诊断,17份讨论了护理计划,包括医疗干预方案和分娩方式。其中,65%(11/17)选择舒适护理,35%(6/17)选择重症监护。两组比较显示舒适护理组的决策期较长(中位数,29天vs. 9天;p = 0.044)。临床心理学家或姑息治疗专家没有提供产前决策支持,包括关于胎儿状况、护理计划选择和心理支持的准确信息。在这17名患者中,有4人出院回家,1人在家中死亡。实践结论:本研究强调了在社区实施围产期姑息治疗的挑战。与舒适护理相关的长期决策过程可能反映了家庭的重大心理负担。护理计划等因素影响家庭负担,强调个性化支持的必要性。缺乏专门的支持和低比率过渡到家庭护理的临终关怀是改善社区围产期姑息治疗的关键问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Maternal and Child Health Journal
Maternal and Child Health Journal PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
271
期刊介绍: Maternal and Child Health Journal is the first exclusive forum to advance the scientific and professional knowledge base of the maternal and child health (MCH) field. This bimonthly provides peer-reviewed papers addressing the following areas of MCH practice, policy, and research: MCH epidemiology, demography, and health status assessment Innovative MCH service initiatives Implementation of MCH programs MCH policy analysis and advocacy MCH professional development. Exploring the full spectrum of the MCH field, Maternal and Child Health Journal is an important tool for practitioners as well as academics in public health, obstetrics, gynecology, prenatal medicine, pediatrics, and neonatology. Sponsors include the Association of Maternal and Child Health Programs (AMCHP), the Association of Teachers of Maternal and Child Health (ATMCH), and CityMatCH.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信