Xianghan Chen, Li Yang, Weihuan Hou, Hongjuan Zhang, Yingmei Wang, Peizhen Hu, Lu Yu
{"title":"Myxoid inflammatory myofibroblastic sarcoma with multiple liver metastases showing both PML::JAK1 fusion and KRAS mutation.","authors":"Xianghan Chen, Li Yang, Weihuan Hou, Hongjuan Zhang, Yingmei Wang, Peizhen Hu, Lu Yu","doi":"10.1007/s00428-025-04228-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Recently, Papke et al. reported two cases of myxoid inflammatory myofibroblastic sarcoma with PML::JAK1 fusion. Smith et al. identified a high-grade PML::JAK1 fusion sarcoma. Here, we present the fourth case of a PML::JAK1 fusion sarcoma, the first to harbor a concomitant KRAS hotspot mutation (KRAS Q61H). Morphological manifestations include prominent myxoid stroma, lobulated but infiltrative growth patterns, and branching blood vessels. In contrast to Papke et al., we observed distinct non-myxoid stromal fascicular herringbone solid architecture and perivascular spaces, thereby expanding the morphological spectrum of PML::JAK1 fusion. The tumor was approximately 80% myxoid and 20% solid in composition. Importantly, a needle biopsy confirmed liver metastases of myxoid inflammatory myofibroblastic sarcoma in this case, suggesting its bland morphology but aggressive clinical behavior, which is a major potential diagnostic pitfall for this tumor. In addition, the presence of both myxoid lobular and herringbone regions in the present case suggests that the PML::JAK1 fusion sarcomas reported by Papke et al. and Smith et al. might be on a biological spectrum.</p>","PeriodicalId":23514,"journal":{"name":"Virchows Archiv","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Virchows Archiv","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-025-04228-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Recently, Papke et al. reported two cases of myxoid inflammatory myofibroblastic sarcoma with PML::JAK1 fusion. Smith et al. identified a high-grade PML::JAK1 fusion sarcoma. Here, we present the fourth case of a PML::JAK1 fusion sarcoma, the first to harbor a concomitant KRAS hotspot mutation (KRAS Q61H). Morphological manifestations include prominent myxoid stroma, lobulated but infiltrative growth patterns, and branching blood vessels. In contrast to Papke et al., we observed distinct non-myxoid stromal fascicular herringbone solid architecture and perivascular spaces, thereby expanding the morphological spectrum of PML::JAK1 fusion. The tumor was approximately 80% myxoid and 20% solid in composition. Importantly, a needle biopsy confirmed liver metastases of myxoid inflammatory myofibroblastic sarcoma in this case, suggesting its bland morphology but aggressive clinical behavior, which is a major potential diagnostic pitfall for this tumor. In addition, the presence of both myxoid lobular and herringbone regions in the present case suggests that the PML::JAK1 fusion sarcomas reported by Papke et al. and Smith et al. might be on a biological spectrum.
期刊介绍:
Manuscripts of original studies reinforcing the evidence base of modern diagnostic pathology, using immunocytochemical, molecular and ultrastructural techniques, will be welcomed. In addition, papers on critical evaluation of diagnostic criteria but also broadsheets and guidelines with a solid evidence base will be considered. Consideration will also be given to reports of work in other fields relevant to the understanding of human pathology as well as manuscripts on the application of new methods and techniques in pathology. Submission of purely experimental articles is discouraged but manuscripts on experimental work applicable to diagnostic pathology are welcomed. Biomarker studies are welcomed but need to abide by strict rules (e.g. REMARK) of adequate sample size and relevant marker choice. Single marker studies on limited patient series without validated application will as a rule not be considered. Case reports will only be considered when they provide substantial new information with an impact on understanding disease or diagnostic practice.