Television watching and cognitive outcomes in adults and older adults: A systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of observational studies.

IF 2.6 3区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
PLoS ONE Pub Date : 2025-09-12 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0323863
Hattapark Dejakaisaya, Wiriya Mahikul, Nat Na-Ek, Chanawee Hirunpattarasilp
{"title":"Television watching and cognitive outcomes in adults and older adults: A systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of observational studies.","authors":"Hattapark Dejakaisaya, Wiriya Mahikul, Nat Na-Ek, Chanawee Hirunpattarasilp","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0323863","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to examine the association between television watching and cognitive outcomes in adults and older adults as the current evidence is inconsistent. We searched the Cochrane, MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, Scopus, and Web of Science databases for relevant studies from inception to June 30, 2024. Risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Dose-response and conventional meta-analyses were performed using one-stage random-effects and DerSimonian and Laird random-effects models, respectively. Our systematic review included 35 studies with 1,292,052 participants (8,572 cases of cognitive impairment), of which 28 studies were further meta-analyzed. A dose-response meta-analysis revealed a nonlinear association between time spent watching TV and an increased risk of cognitive impairment (Wald test p-value = 0.04), particularly for viewing durations of ≥4 hours per day. Additionally, watching ≥6 hours of television per day was associated with a significant decrease in cognitive score (standardized beta coefficient = -0.09; 95% CI: -0.17, -0.003; I2 = 71.8%; seven studies). Also, a longer television-watching time was associated with a lower cognitive score (pooled standardized mean difference = -0.02; 95% CI: -0.03, -0.003; I2 = 66.45%; six studies). Watching television for a longer period was associated with negative cognitive outcomes in adults and older adults. Further research is needed to confirm this association and elucidate the underlying biological mechanisms.</p>","PeriodicalId":20189,"journal":{"name":"PLoS ONE","volume":"20 9","pages":"e0323863"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12431243/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLoS ONE","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0323863","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to examine the association between television watching and cognitive outcomes in adults and older adults as the current evidence is inconsistent. We searched the Cochrane, MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, Scopus, and Web of Science databases for relevant studies from inception to June 30, 2024. Risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Dose-response and conventional meta-analyses were performed using one-stage random-effects and DerSimonian and Laird random-effects models, respectively. Our systematic review included 35 studies with 1,292,052 participants (8,572 cases of cognitive impairment), of which 28 studies were further meta-analyzed. A dose-response meta-analysis revealed a nonlinear association between time spent watching TV and an increased risk of cognitive impairment (Wald test p-value = 0.04), particularly for viewing durations of ≥4 hours per day. Additionally, watching ≥6 hours of television per day was associated with a significant decrease in cognitive score (standardized beta coefficient = -0.09; 95% CI: -0.17, -0.003; I2 = 71.8%; seven studies). Also, a longer television-watching time was associated with a lower cognitive score (pooled standardized mean difference = -0.02; 95% CI: -0.03, -0.003; I2 = 66.45%; six studies). Watching television for a longer period was associated with negative cognitive outcomes in adults and older adults. Further research is needed to confirm this association and elucidate the underlying biological mechanisms.

成人和老年人看电视和认知结果:观察性研究的系统回顾和剂量反应荟萃分析。
本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在检查成年人和老年人看电视与认知结果之间的关系,因为目前的证据不一致。我们检索了Cochrane, MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, Scopus和Web of Science数据库,从成立到2024年6月30日的相关研究。偏倚风险采用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表进行评估。剂量-反应和常规荟萃分析分别使用一期随机效应和DerSimonian和Laird随机效应模型进行。我们的系统综述包括35项研究,1,292,052名参与者(8,572例认知障碍),其中28项研究进行了进一步的meta分析。一项剂量-反应荟萃分析显示,看电视时间与认知障碍风险增加之间存在非线性关联(Wald检验p值= 0.04),特别是每天看电视时间≥4小时。此外,每天看电视≥6小时与认知评分显著下降相关(标准化β系数= -0.09;95% CI: -0.17, -0.003; I2 = 71.8%; 7项研究)。此外,较长的电视观看时间与较低的认知得分相关(合并标准化平均差= -0.02;95% CI: -0.03, -0.003; I2 = 66.45%; 6项研究)。在成年人和老年人中,长时间看电视与负面认知结果有关。需要进一步的研究来证实这种关联并阐明潜在的生物学机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
PLoS ONE
PLoS ONE 生物-生物学
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
5.40%
发文量
14242
审稿时长
3.7 months
期刊介绍: PLOS ONE is an international, peer-reviewed, open-access, online publication. PLOS ONE welcomes reports on primary research from any scientific discipline. It provides: * Open-access—freely accessible online, authors retain copyright * Fast publication times * Peer review by expert, practicing researchers * Post-publication tools to indicate quality and impact * Community-based dialogue on articles * Worldwide media coverage
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信