Distinct prefrontal lateralization in placebo and reappraisal mechanisms: An ALE meta-analysis

IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 NEUROIMAGING
Bianca Monachesi , Elisabetta Pisanu , Daniele Chiffi , Raffaella Ida Rumiati , Alessandro Grecucci
{"title":"Distinct prefrontal lateralization in placebo and reappraisal mechanisms: An ALE meta-analysis","authors":"Bianca Monachesi ,&nbsp;Elisabetta Pisanu ,&nbsp;Daniele Chiffi ,&nbsp;Raffaella Ida Rumiati ,&nbsp;Alessandro Grecucci","doi":"10.1016/j.neuroimage.2025.121459","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Cognitive reappraisal is an emotional regulation strategy by which the individual changes the perspective on a situation to alter its emotional impact. Similar reinterpretation mechanisms have been associated with the placebo effect in which beliefs about the efficacy of a treatment modulate subjective experience and physiological responses. This analogy raises the hypothesis that reappraisal and placebo may share neural networks. However, despite previous efforts to identify these networks separately, there has been no recent systematic comparison using a whole-brain meta-analytic approach. To fill this gap, in the current study, we performed a coordinate-based ALE meta-analysis of task-based fMRI studies investigating reappraisal and placebo. Results show that both processes recruit the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), highlighting the shared cognitive control mechanisms by which they modify the emotional response. However, reappraisal primarily engages the <em>left</em> portion of the DLPFC, along with the ventrolateral PFC and dorsomedial PFC, while placebo primarily engages the <em>right</em> portion of the DLPFC. These results show that despite common general aspects, reappraisal and placebo are different in nature and rely on different neuropsychological mechanisms. We discuss possible explanations and their implications for clinical practice and future research.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":19299,"journal":{"name":"NeuroImage","volume":"320 ","pages":"Article 121459"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NeuroImage","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053811925004628","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROIMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cognitive reappraisal is an emotional regulation strategy by which the individual changes the perspective on a situation to alter its emotional impact. Similar reinterpretation mechanisms have been associated with the placebo effect in which beliefs about the efficacy of a treatment modulate subjective experience and physiological responses. This analogy raises the hypothesis that reappraisal and placebo may share neural networks. However, despite previous efforts to identify these networks separately, there has been no recent systematic comparison using a whole-brain meta-analytic approach. To fill this gap, in the current study, we performed a coordinate-based ALE meta-analysis of task-based fMRI studies investigating reappraisal and placebo. Results show that both processes recruit the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), highlighting the shared cognitive control mechanisms by which they modify the emotional response. However, reappraisal primarily engages the left portion of the DLPFC, along with the ventrolateral PFC and dorsomedial PFC, while placebo primarily engages the right portion of the DLPFC. These results show that despite common general aspects, reappraisal and placebo are different in nature and rely on different neuropsychological mechanisms. We discuss possible explanations and their implications for clinical practice and future research.
不同的前额叶偏侧在安慰剂和重新评价机制:一项ALE荟萃分析。
认知重评是一种情绪调节策略,个体通过改变对情境的看法来改变其情绪影响。类似的重新解释机制与安慰剂效应有关,即对治疗效果的信念调节主观体验和生理反应。这个类比提出了一个假设,即重新评估和安慰剂可能共享神经网络。然而,尽管之前的努力分别识别这些网络,但最近还没有使用全脑元分析方法进行系统比较。为了填补这一空白,在当前的研究中,我们对基于任务的fMRI研究进行了基于坐标的ALE荟萃分析,研究了重评价和安慰剂。结果表明,这两个过程都调动了背外侧前额叶皮层(DLPFC),突出了它们共同的认知控制机制,通过这些机制来调节情绪反应。然而,重新评估主要作用于DLPFC的左侧,以及腹外侧PFC和背内侧PFC,而安慰剂主要作用于DLPFC的右侧。这些结果表明,尽管有共同的一般方面,重评价和安慰剂在本质上是不同的,依赖于不同的神经心理机制。我们讨论了可能的解释及其对临床实践和未来研究的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
NeuroImage
NeuroImage 医学-核医学
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
10.50%
发文量
809
审稿时长
63 days
期刊介绍: NeuroImage, a Journal of Brain Function provides a vehicle for communicating important advances in acquiring, analyzing, and modelling neuroimaging data and in applying these techniques to the study of structure-function and brain-behavior relationships. Though the emphasis is on the macroscopic level of human brain organization, meso-and microscopic neuroimaging across all species will be considered if informative for understanding the aforementioned relationships.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信