A Prebiotic-Supplemented Formula Improves Gut Microbiota and Intestinal Inflammatory Microenvironment in Patients with Colorectal Adenoma: A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial.
{"title":"A Prebiotic-Supplemented Formula Improves Gut Microbiota and Intestinal Inflammatory Microenvironment in Patients with Colorectal Adenoma: A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial.","authors":"Sijia Meng, Chen Liu, Keming Zhang, Jiqiu Li, Dan Wang, Jing Zhao, Yu Wang, Meizhi Du, Chunyan Li, Yuan Wang, Wenli Lu, Yun Zhu","doi":"10.1016/j.tjnut.2025.09.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Colorectal cancer is preventable, and patients with colorectal adenomas are at high risk of colorectal cancer.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the effects of a complex prebiotic formulation on the gut microbiota and inflammation levels in patients with colorectal adenoma.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial assigned patients with adenomatous polyps to either the prebiotic intervention group (N = 51) or the placebo control group (N = 49). Blood and stool samples were collected at baseline and week 12; mixed-effects models were used to analyze the impact of the prebiotic on gut microbiota and inflammatory markers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both groups showed an increase in Bacteroidetes abundance over 12 wk, but the increase was smaller in the intervention group [β = -5.507; 95% confidence interval (CI): -11.390, 0.375; P = 0.066]. Unidentified Ruminococcaceae increased in the intervention group (β = 2.072; 95% CI: -0.130, 4.274; P = 0.065), but declined in the control group. A significant increase in interleukin-10 concentrations was observed in the intervention group (β = 0.778; 95% CI: 0.132, 1.425; P = 0.019), in contrast to a downward trend in the control group. Notably, baseline tumor necrosis factor-α concentrations appeared to modify the intervention's microbial effects. Specifically, for each 1 pg/mL increase, the intervention was associated with increased Actinobacteria (β = 0.624; 95% CI: 0.100, 1.148; P-interaction <sub>=</sub> 0.020), Bifidobacteriaceae (β = 0.608; 95% CI: 0.114, 1.103; P-interaction = 0.017), and Bifidobacterium (β = 0.608; 95% CI: 0.114, 1.103; P-interaction = 0.017). However, these associations did not remain statistically significant after false discovery rate adjustment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The prebiotic intervention effectively increased the abundance of beneficial bacteria, while simultaneously reducing inflammatory levels in individuals with colorectal adenoma. This trial was registered at XXX as ChiCTR2100046390.</p>","PeriodicalId":16620,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nutrition","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tjnut.2025.09.005","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Colorectal cancer is preventable, and patients with colorectal adenomas are at high risk of colorectal cancer.
Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the effects of a complex prebiotic formulation on the gut microbiota and inflammation levels in patients with colorectal adenoma.
Methods: A randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial assigned patients with adenomatous polyps to either the prebiotic intervention group (N = 51) or the placebo control group (N = 49). Blood and stool samples were collected at baseline and week 12; mixed-effects models were used to analyze the impact of the prebiotic on gut microbiota and inflammatory markers.
Results: Both groups showed an increase in Bacteroidetes abundance over 12 wk, but the increase was smaller in the intervention group [β = -5.507; 95% confidence interval (CI): -11.390, 0.375; P = 0.066]. Unidentified Ruminococcaceae increased in the intervention group (β = 2.072; 95% CI: -0.130, 4.274; P = 0.065), but declined in the control group. A significant increase in interleukin-10 concentrations was observed in the intervention group (β = 0.778; 95% CI: 0.132, 1.425; P = 0.019), in contrast to a downward trend in the control group. Notably, baseline tumor necrosis factor-α concentrations appeared to modify the intervention's microbial effects. Specifically, for each 1 pg/mL increase, the intervention was associated with increased Actinobacteria (β = 0.624; 95% CI: 0.100, 1.148; P-interaction = 0.020), Bifidobacteriaceae (β = 0.608; 95% CI: 0.114, 1.103; P-interaction = 0.017), and Bifidobacterium (β = 0.608; 95% CI: 0.114, 1.103; P-interaction = 0.017). However, these associations did not remain statistically significant after false discovery rate adjustment.
Conclusions: The prebiotic intervention effectively increased the abundance of beneficial bacteria, while simultaneously reducing inflammatory levels in individuals with colorectal adenoma. This trial was registered at XXX as ChiCTR2100046390.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Nutrition (JN/J Nutr) publishes peer-reviewed original research papers covering all aspects of experimental nutrition in humans and other animal species; special articles such as reviews and biographies of prominent nutrition scientists; and issues, opinions, and commentaries on controversial issues in nutrition. Supplements are frequently published to provide extended discussion of topics of special interest.