Mitigating Gluten Cross-Contact in Shared Frying Oil through Passive and Active Filtration

IF 2.8 4区 农林科学 Q3 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
Xingyi Jiang , Robert Beverly , Aravind Kumar Bingi , Qinchun Rao , Jeremiah Kidd , Karen Swajian , Jane Cluster , Lauren Jackson
{"title":"Mitigating Gluten Cross-Contact in Shared Frying Oil through Passive and Active Filtration","authors":"Xingyi Jiang ,&nbsp;Robert Beverly ,&nbsp;Aravind Kumar Bingi ,&nbsp;Qinchun Rao ,&nbsp;Jeremiah Kidd ,&nbsp;Karen Swajian ,&nbsp;Jane Cluster ,&nbsp;Lauren Jackson","doi":"10.1016/j.jfp.2025.100618","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Food manufacturers commonly use filtration with or without filter aids to extend the shelf life of frying oil by removing undesirable substances that form during frying. However, limited research has evaluated the effectiveness of these methods in removing proteins that transfer into frying oil from fried foods. The objective of this study was to assess the efficiency of different filtration methods for removing gluten residues from frying oil. For passive filtration, oil spiked with isolated gluten at a level of 1,000 µg gluten/g oil and oil used for frying 10 batches of breaded shrimp (75 g/batch) were filtered under gravity through metal sieves (pore sizes: 25 µm-2 mm) and cellulose filter papers (pore sizes: 11–25 µm). For active filtration condition selection, gluten-spiked oil (5,000 µg gluten/g oil) was heated (180 °C for 3 min), cooled to 105 °C, and then treated with filter aids – diatomaceous earth (Celite 535) and perlite (Harborlite 900) – at concentrations ranging from 0.05 to 1%, with mixing times of 5–30 min at 1,000 rpm. Subsequently, the oil was filtered through metal sieves (pore sizes: 0.15, 0.6, and 2 mm). Response surface methodology was employed to identify optimal conditions based on their ability to minimize residual gluten. The optimal condition (0.5% filter aid concentration, 30 min mixing time, and 0.15 mm pore size) was then applied to a total of six filter aids. Under these conditions, passive filtration resulted in over 80% reduction in gluten content of oil while the filtration efficiency of active filtration methods was greater than 99.7%. Removal efficiency varied among the six filter aids, with magnesium silicate and diatomaceous earth-based filter aids demonstrating the best performance. Overall, this study highlighted both passive and active filtration as a promising strategy to significantly minimize gluten cross-contact risks associated with reused frying oil, providing practical guidance for gluten management during frying operations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15903,"journal":{"name":"Journal of food protection","volume":"88 11","pages":"Article 100618"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of food protection","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0362028X2500170X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Food manufacturers commonly use filtration with or without filter aids to extend the shelf life of frying oil by removing undesirable substances that form during frying. However, limited research has evaluated the effectiveness of these methods in removing proteins that transfer into frying oil from fried foods. The objective of this study was to assess the efficiency of different filtration methods for removing gluten residues from frying oil. For passive filtration, oil spiked with isolated gluten at a level of 1,000 µg gluten/g oil and oil used for frying 10 batches of breaded shrimp (75 g/batch) were filtered under gravity through metal sieves (pore sizes: 25 µm-2 mm) and cellulose filter papers (pore sizes: 11–25 µm). For active filtration condition selection, gluten-spiked oil (5,000 µg gluten/g oil) was heated (180 °C for 3 min), cooled to 105 °C, and then treated with filter aids – diatomaceous earth (Celite 535) and perlite (Harborlite 900) – at concentrations ranging from 0.05 to 1%, with mixing times of 5–30 min at 1,000 rpm. Subsequently, the oil was filtered through metal sieves (pore sizes: 0.15, 0.6, and 2 mm). Response surface methodology was employed to identify optimal conditions based on their ability to minimize residual gluten. The optimal condition (0.5% filter aid concentration, 30 min mixing time, and 0.15 mm pore size) was then applied to a total of six filter aids. Under these conditions, passive filtration resulted in over 80% reduction in gluten content of oil while the filtration efficiency of active filtration methods was greater than 99.7%. Removal efficiency varied among the six filter aids, with magnesium silicate and diatomaceous earth-based filter aids demonstrating the best performance. Overall, this study highlighted both passive and active filtration as a promising strategy to significantly minimize gluten cross-contact risks associated with reused frying oil, providing practical guidance for gluten management during frying operations.
通过被动和主动过滤减少共用煎炸油中的面筋交叉接触。
食品制造商通常使用带或不带过滤助剂的过滤,通过去除油炸过程中形成的不良物质来延长油炸油的保质期。然而,有限的研究已经评估了这些方法在去除从油炸食品中转移到煎炸油中的蛋白质方面的有效性。本研究的目的是评估不同过滤方法去除煎炸油中麸质残留物的效率。被动过滤:将分离面筋含量为1000µg /g油的油和用于煎炸10批(75 g/批)面包虾的油通过金属筛(孔径为25µm-2 mm)和纤维素滤纸(孔径为11-25µm)进行重力过滤。对于主动过滤条件的选择,将谷蛋白添加油(5,000µg麸质/g油)加热(180°C, 3分钟),冷却至105°C,然后用过滤助剂硅藻土(Celite 535)和珍珠岩(Harborlite 900)处理,浓度范围为0.05-1%,混合时间为5-30分钟,转速为1,000 rpm。随后,通过金属筛子(孔径:0.15、0.6和2mm)过滤油。利用响应面法确定了最优条件,以最大限度地减少面筋残留。然后将最佳条件(助滤剂浓度0.5%,混合时间30 min,孔径0.15 mm)应用于共6种助滤剂。在此条件下,被动过滤使油中面筋含量降低80%以上,而主动过滤方法的过滤效率大于99.7%。6种助滤剂的去除率各不相同,硅酸镁和硅藻土基助滤剂的去除率最佳。总的来说,本研究强调了被动和主动过滤作为一种有前途的策略,可以显著减少与重复使用的煎炸油相关的面筋交叉接触风险,为煎炸操作中的面筋管理提供实用指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of food protection
Journal of food protection 工程技术-生物工程与应用微生物
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
5.00%
发文量
296
审稿时长
2.5 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Food Protection® (JFP) is an international, monthly scientific journal in the English language published by the International Association for Food Protection (IAFP). JFP publishes research and review articles on all aspects of food protection and safety. Major emphases of JFP are placed on studies dealing with: Tracking, detecting (including traditional, molecular, and real-time), inactivating, and controlling food-related hazards, including microorganisms (including antibiotic resistance), microbial (mycotoxins, seafood toxins) and non-microbial toxins (heavy metals, pesticides, veterinary drug residues, migrants from food packaging, and processing contaminants), allergens and pests (insects, rodents) in human food, pet food and animal feed throughout the food chain; Microbiological food quality and traditional/novel methods to assay microbiological food quality; Prevention of food-related hazards and food spoilage through food preservatives and thermal/non-thermal processes, including process validation; Food fermentations and food-related probiotics; Safe food handling practices during pre-harvest, harvest, post-harvest, distribution and consumption, including food safety education for retailers, foodservice, and consumers; Risk assessments for food-related hazards; Economic impact of food-related hazards, foodborne illness, food loss, food spoilage, and adulterated foods; Food fraud, food authentication, food defense, and foodborne disease outbreak investigations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信