{"title":"Robotic-Assisted Excision of Intravesical Burch Urethropexy Staples and Mesh.","authors":"Courtney K Pfeuti, Brian J Linder","doi":"10.1007/s00192-025-06331-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction and hypothesis: </strong>Use of synthetic mesh material in urogynecology for anti-incontinence surgery risks complications such as vaginal exposure and erosion. Although intravesical erosion is rare, management is complex with limited existing guidance, specifically following retropubic urethral suspension procedures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a 78-year-old female patient referred for management of intravesical mesh and staples. Prior surgical history included a retropubic urethral suspension and laparoscopic Burch urethropexy with Prolene mesh. Following years of persistent urinary symptoms, cystoscopy identified intravesical mesh. Imaging revealed multiple tacking device staples in the retropubic space. Robotic-assisted excision of the intravesical mesh and staples was performed. After identification of the retropubic Burch mesh and dissection to the bladder, an intentional cystotomy was made. Circumferential dissection along the mesh permitted complete excision. The cystotomy was closed in two layers and reinforced with a urachal flap.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The patient was discharged on postoperative day one. After two weeks of Foley catheter use, a cystogram showed no extravasation. The patient passed a voiding trial.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Robotic-assisted excision of intravesical mesh from a retropubic urethropexy is safe and feasible. Complete surgical excision helps achieve a tension-free closure and prevent recurrence. Surgical techniques demonstrated here may be helpful for managing such cases of intravesical mesh.</p>","PeriodicalId":14355,"journal":{"name":"International Urogynecology Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Urogynecology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-025-06331-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction and hypothesis: Use of synthetic mesh material in urogynecology for anti-incontinence surgery risks complications such as vaginal exposure and erosion. Although intravesical erosion is rare, management is complex with limited existing guidance, specifically following retropubic urethral suspension procedures.
Methods: This is a 78-year-old female patient referred for management of intravesical mesh and staples. Prior surgical history included a retropubic urethral suspension and laparoscopic Burch urethropexy with Prolene mesh. Following years of persistent urinary symptoms, cystoscopy identified intravesical mesh. Imaging revealed multiple tacking device staples in the retropubic space. Robotic-assisted excision of the intravesical mesh and staples was performed. After identification of the retropubic Burch mesh and dissection to the bladder, an intentional cystotomy was made. Circumferential dissection along the mesh permitted complete excision. The cystotomy was closed in two layers and reinforced with a urachal flap.
Results: The patient was discharged on postoperative day one. After two weeks of Foley catheter use, a cystogram showed no extravasation. The patient passed a voiding trial.
Conclusions: Robotic-assisted excision of intravesical mesh from a retropubic urethropexy is safe and feasible. Complete surgical excision helps achieve a tension-free closure and prevent recurrence. Surgical techniques demonstrated here may be helpful for managing such cases of intravesical mesh.
期刊介绍:
The International Urogynecology Journal is the official journal of the International Urogynecological Association (IUGA).The International Urogynecology Journal has evolved in response to a perceived need amongst the clinicians, scientists, and researchers active in the field of urogynecology and pelvic floor disorders. Gynecologists, urologists, physiotherapists, nurses and basic scientists require regular means of communication within this field of pelvic floor dysfunction to express new ideas and research, and to review clinical practice in the diagnosis and treatment of women with disorders of the pelvic floor. This Journal has adopted the peer review process for all original contributions and will maintain high standards with regard to the research published therein. The clinical approach to urogynecology and pelvic floor disorders will be emphasized with each issue containing clinically relevant material that will be immediately applicable for clinical medicine. This publication covers all aspects of the field in an interdisciplinary fashion