Study of the gut microbial diversity of Mytilus coruscus with different growth rates.

IF 3.1 4区 生物学 Q3 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
Jiaxin Gao, Xiaoao Yang, Pengzhi Qi, Liangming Chen, Peipei Fu, Denghui Zhu
{"title":"Study of the gut microbial diversity of Mytilus coruscus with different growth rates.","authors":"Jiaxin Gao, Xiaoao Yang, Pengzhi Qi, Liangming Chen, Peipei Fu, Denghui Zhu","doi":"10.1007/s12223-025-01329-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To examine intestinal microbiota-growth rate relationships in Mytilus coruscus, we analyzed genetically similar individuals under uniform aquaculture conditions using 16S rRNA sequencing, comparing fast-growing (L) and slow-growing (S) groups. Results demonstrated that Proteobacteria and Bacteroidota were the dominant phyla in the intestine of M. coruscus, and Pseudoalteromonas and Vibrio were the dominant genera. The relative abundances of Proteobacteria (84.30%) and Pseudoalteromonas (44.64%) in group L were significantly higher than those in group S (69.50% and 15.41% respectively), while the relative abundances of Bacteroidota (9.49%) and Tenacibaculum (2.21%) in group L were significantly lower than those in group S (19.42% and 4.54% respectively) (p < 0.05). In terms of diversity analysis, the microbial α diversity (Shannon and Simpson indices) in group L was significantly lower than that in group S. Beta diversity analysis (PCoA and PERMANOVA) showed that there were significant differences in the intestinal microbiota structure between group L and group S. Pearson correlation analysis further found that the relative abundance of Amphritea was significantly positively (r = 0.78-0.81, p < 0.05) correlated with the growth rate of M. coruscus, while Tenacibaculum was significantly negatively (r = -0.72-0.73, p < 0.05) correlated. In addition, functional prediction via PICRUSt indicates Amphritea may promote growth by enhancing host nutrient metabolism, while Tenacibaculum enrichment might hinder host development through resource competition or metabolic interference. This study demonstrates the association between M. coruscus growth rate and gut microbiota, provides a basis for promoting its growth by regulating the intestinal microbiota, and holds significant reference value for efficient aquaculture production and health management.</p>","PeriodicalId":12346,"journal":{"name":"Folia microbiologica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Folia microbiologica","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12223-025-01329-6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To examine intestinal microbiota-growth rate relationships in Mytilus coruscus, we analyzed genetically similar individuals under uniform aquaculture conditions using 16S rRNA sequencing, comparing fast-growing (L) and slow-growing (S) groups. Results demonstrated that Proteobacteria and Bacteroidota were the dominant phyla in the intestine of M. coruscus, and Pseudoalteromonas and Vibrio were the dominant genera. The relative abundances of Proteobacteria (84.30%) and Pseudoalteromonas (44.64%) in group L were significantly higher than those in group S (69.50% and 15.41% respectively), while the relative abundances of Bacteroidota (9.49%) and Tenacibaculum (2.21%) in group L were significantly lower than those in group S (19.42% and 4.54% respectively) (p < 0.05). In terms of diversity analysis, the microbial α diversity (Shannon and Simpson indices) in group L was significantly lower than that in group S. Beta diversity analysis (PCoA and PERMANOVA) showed that there were significant differences in the intestinal microbiota structure between group L and group S. Pearson correlation analysis further found that the relative abundance of Amphritea was significantly positively (r = 0.78-0.81, p < 0.05) correlated with the growth rate of M. coruscus, while Tenacibaculum was significantly negatively (r = -0.72-0.73, p < 0.05) correlated. In addition, functional prediction via PICRUSt indicates Amphritea may promote growth by enhancing host nutrient metabolism, while Tenacibaculum enrichment might hinder host development through resource competition or metabolic interference. This study demonstrates the association between M. coruscus growth rate and gut microbiota, provides a basis for promoting its growth by regulating the intestinal microbiota, and holds significant reference value for efficient aquaculture production and health management.

不同生长速率贻贝肠道微生物多样性的研究。
为了研究贻贝(Mytilus coruscus)肠道微生物群生长速率的关系,我们使用16S rRNA测序分析了在统一养殖条件下遗传相似的个体,比较了快速生长(L)组和缓慢生长(S)组。结果表明,变形菌门和拟杆菌门是冠状假单胞菌门的优势菌门,假互生单胞菌门和弧菌门的优势菌门。L组变形菌门(84.30%)和假异单胞菌门(44.64%)的相对丰度显著高于S组(分别为69.50%和15.41%),拟杆菌门(9.49%)和链菌门(2.21%)的相对丰度显著低于S组(分别为19.42%和4.54%)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Folia microbiologica
Folia microbiologica 工程技术-生物工程与应用微生物
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
82
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Unlike journals which specialize ever more narrowly, Folia Microbiologica (FM) takes an open approach that spans general, soil, medical and industrial microbiology, plus some branches of immunology. This English-language journal publishes original papers, reviews and mini-reviews, short communications and book reviews. The coverage includes cutting-edge methods and promising new topics, as well as studies using established methods that exhibit promise in practical applications such as medicine, animal husbandry and more. The coverage of FM is expanding beyond Central and Eastern Europe, with a growing proportion of its contents contributed by international authors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信