Concordance Between Clinical and Pathological Diagnosis of Stromal Corneal Dystrophies in a Large Case Series.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Angela Fajardo, Katherine Jara Noel, Acácia Azevedo, Emily Marcotte, Mahshad Darvish, Guillermo Rocha, Miguel Burnier
{"title":"Concordance Between Clinical and Pathological Diagnosis of Stromal Corneal Dystrophies in a Large Case Series.","authors":"Angela Fajardo, Katherine Jara Noel, Acácia Azevedo, Emily Marcotte, Mahshad Darvish, Guillermo Rocha, Miguel Burnier","doi":"10.1097/ICO.0000000000003980","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess the frequency and histopathological features of stromal corneal dystrophies. In addition, we sought to evaluate the concordance between the clinical diagnoses provided by ophthalmologists and the pathological reports.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed all cases of stromal corneal dystrophies between 1996 and 2022. Data were collected from pathological reports of corneal buttons obtained from penetrating keratoplasties (PK). Clinical and pathological diagnoses along with demographic information were recorded. Concordance between clinical and pathological diagnoses was assessed using frequency analysis and Cohen kappa coefficient.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Histopathological review of 1440 corneal specimens from PK revealed 56 (3.8%) stromal corneal dystrophies in 53 patients. The most common dystrophy found was lattice corneal dystrophy (LCD), present in 30 specimens (53.6%), followed by granular corneal dystrophy type 2 in 14 specimens (25.0%), granular corneal dystrophy type 1 in 7 specimens (12.5%), and macular corneal dystrophy in 5 specimens (8.9%). Concordance between clinical and pathological diagnoses was observed in 37 of 45 cases, resulting in an overall concordance rate of 82.2% with a Cohen kappa coefficient of 0.64.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The concordance rate of 82.2% and Cohen kappa coefficient of 0.64 indicate strong agreement between clinical and pathological diagnoses of stromal corneal dystrophies. However, despite ranking as the second most common dystrophy, the absence of clinical diagnoses for granular corneal dystrophy type 2 highlights the critical need to use both Masson Trichrome and Congo red stains when granular or lattice-like deposits are present in the cornea to ensure precise and reliable diagnosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":10710,"journal":{"name":"Cornea","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cornea","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ICO.0000000000003980","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To assess the frequency and histopathological features of stromal corneal dystrophies. In addition, we sought to evaluate the concordance between the clinical diagnoses provided by ophthalmologists and the pathological reports.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed all cases of stromal corneal dystrophies between 1996 and 2022. Data were collected from pathological reports of corneal buttons obtained from penetrating keratoplasties (PK). Clinical and pathological diagnoses along with demographic information were recorded. Concordance between clinical and pathological diagnoses was assessed using frequency analysis and Cohen kappa coefficient.

Results: Histopathological review of 1440 corneal specimens from PK revealed 56 (3.8%) stromal corneal dystrophies in 53 patients. The most common dystrophy found was lattice corneal dystrophy (LCD), present in 30 specimens (53.6%), followed by granular corneal dystrophy type 2 in 14 specimens (25.0%), granular corneal dystrophy type 1 in 7 specimens (12.5%), and macular corneal dystrophy in 5 specimens (8.9%). Concordance between clinical and pathological diagnoses was observed in 37 of 45 cases, resulting in an overall concordance rate of 82.2% with a Cohen kappa coefficient of 0.64.

Conclusions: The concordance rate of 82.2% and Cohen kappa coefficient of 0.64 indicate strong agreement between clinical and pathological diagnoses of stromal corneal dystrophies. However, despite ranking as the second most common dystrophy, the absence of clinical diagnoses for granular corneal dystrophy type 2 highlights the critical need to use both Masson Trichrome and Congo red stains when granular or lattice-like deposits are present in the cornea to ensure precise and reliable diagnosis.

大病例系列间质性角膜营养不良的临床与病理诊断的一致性。
目的:探讨角膜间质营养不良的发病频率和组织病理学特征。此外,我们试图评估眼科医生提供的临床诊断与病理报告之间的一致性。方法:回顾性分析1996年至2022年间所有间质性角膜营养不良病例。数据来自穿透性角膜成形术(PK)获得的角膜钮扣的病理报告。记录临床、病理诊断及人口统计学信息。采用频率分析和Cohen kappa系数评估临床与病理诊断的一致性。结果:对来自PK的1440例角膜标本进行组织病理学检查,发现53例患者中56例(3.8%)角膜基质营养不良。最常见的是晶格状角膜营养不良(LCD), 30例(53.6%),其次是2型颗粒状角膜营养不良14例(25.0%),1型颗粒状角膜营养不良7例(12.5%),黄斑状角膜营养不良5例(8.9%)。45例患者中有37例临床诊断与病理诊断相符,总体符合率为82.2%,Cohen kappa系数为0.64。结论:间质性角膜营养不良的临床诊断与病理诊断的符合率为82.2%,Cohen kappa系数为0.64。然而,尽管2型颗粒状角膜营养不良是第二常见的营养不良,但缺乏临床诊断,当角膜中存在颗粒状或格状沉积物时,迫切需要使用马松三色和刚果红染色,以确保准确可靠的诊断。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cornea
Cornea 医学-眼科学
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
10.70%
发文量
354
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: For corneal specialists and for all general ophthalmologists with an interest in this exciting subspecialty, Cornea brings together the latest clinical and basic research on the cornea and the anterior segment of the eye. Each volume is peer-reviewed by Cornea''s board of world-renowned experts and fully indexed in archival format. Your subscription brings you the latest developments in your field and a growing library of valuable professional references. Sponsored by The Cornea Society which was founded as the Castroviejo Cornea Society in 1975.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信