Scott W. Herke , Linda M. Heffernan , William N. Beavers , Basel H. Abuaita
{"title":"Mapping transposon insertion sites within bacterial genomes by direct Sanger sequencing","authors":"Scott W. Herke , Linda M. Heffernan , William N. Beavers , Basel H. Abuaita","doi":"10.1016/j.ab.2025.115971","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Microbial biomedical research frequently involves mutagenesis by insertion of transposons into the genome. Currently, transposon insertion locations are typically elucidated by Next Generation Sequencing or by Sanger sequencing of PCR products. Here, transposons were located by direct Sanger sequencing of bacterial genomic DNA from both <em>Salmonella enterica</em> (Gram-negative) and <em>Staphylococcus aureus</em> (Gram-positive) cultures. DNA was prepared by shearing to a modal size of ∼2 kb followed by purification by paramagnetic beads. Sequencing reactions involved relatively minor modifications of standard protocols (e.g., extra sequencing polymerase, 75–100 PCR cycles); completed reactions were cleaned by ethanol-EDTA precipitation. Reads were generated on the ABI 3130xl Genetic Analyzer using 50-cm capillary arrays and a run protocol modified for extra sample injection time. Good quality reads of ∼500–800 nt were routinely generated; BLAST results returned nearly 100% matches to genomes in the NCBI database. As implemented, the optimized protocol (post-DNA extraction) could be performed within an 8-h workday (with sequencing results the following day) for ∼$10 (USD) per sequencing reaction. Although this method was developed to locate transposons inserted into bacterial genomes, it seems likely that it can be extended to generate sequence data from even native single-copy genes from small genomes (e.g., <5 Mb).</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7830,"journal":{"name":"Analytical biochemistry","volume":"708 ","pages":"Article 115971"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Analytical biochemistry","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003269725002106","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Microbial biomedical research frequently involves mutagenesis by insertion of transposons into the genome. Currently, transposon insertion locations are typically elucidated by Next Generation Sequencing or by Sanger sequencing of PCR products. Here, transposons were located by direct Sanger sequencing of bacterial genomic DNA from both Salmonella enterica (Gram-negative) and Staphylococcus aureus (Gram-positive) cultures. DNA was prepared by shearing to a modal size of ∼2 kb followed by purification by paramagnetic beads. Sequencing reactions involved relatively minor modifications of standard protocols (e.g., extra sequencing polymerase, 75–100 PCR cycles); completed reactions were cleaned by ethanol-EDTA precipitation. Reads were generated on the ABI 3130xl Genetic Analyzer using 50-cm capillary arrays and a run protocol modified for extra sample injection time. Good quality reads of ∼500–800 nt were routinely generated; BLAST results returned nearly 100% matches to genomes in the NCBI database. As implemented, the optimized protocol (post-DNA extraction) could be performed within an 8-h workday (with sequencing results the following day) for ∼$10 (USD) per sequencing reaction. Although this method was developed to locate transposons inserted into bacterial genomes, it seems likely that it can be extended to generate sequence data from even native single-copy genes from small genomes (e.g., <5 Mb).
期刊介绍:
The journal''s title Analytical Biochemistry: Methods in the Biological Sciences declares its broad scope: methods for the basic biological sciences that include biochemistry, molecular genetics, cell biology, proteomics, immunology, bioinformatics and wherever the frontiers of research take the field.
The emphasis is on methods from the strictly analytical to the more preparative that would include novel approaches to protein purification as well as improvements in cell and organ culture. The actual techniques are equally inclusive ranging from aptamers to zymology.
The journal has been particularly active in:
-Analytical techniques for biological molecules-
Aptamer selection and utilization-
Biosensors-
Chromatography-
Cloning, sequencing and mutagenesis-
Electrochemical methods-
Electrophoresis-
Enzyme characterization methods-
Immunological approaches-
Mass spectrometry of proteins and nucleic acids-
Metabolomics-
Nano level techniques-
Optical spectroscopy in all its forms.
The journal is reluctant to include most drug and strictly clinical studies as there are more suitable publication platforms for these types of papers.