Clinical outcomes for neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy or chemotherapy versus concurrent chemoradiotherapy in limited-stage small-cell lung cancer: A retrospective, multi-center, real-world study.

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Zichen Zhao, Hao Rong, Mengxia Li, Yong Xu, Long Tian, Xiaoming Qiu, Hu Liao, Yalun Li, Ke Wang, Xiaojun Tang, Panwen Tian, Daxing Zhu, Qinghua Zhou, Yan Zhang
{"title":"Clinical outcomes for neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy or chemotherapy versus concurrent chemoradiotherapy in limited-stage small-cell lung cancer: A retrospective, multi-center, real-world study.","authors":"Zichen Zhao, Hao Rong, Mengxia Li, Yong Xu, Long Tian, Xiaoming Qiu, Hu Liao, Yalun Li, Ke Wang, Xiaojun Tang, Panwen Tian, Daxing Zhu, Qinghua Zhou, Yan Zhang","doi":"10.1002/ijc.70153","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The clinical value of neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy in limited-stage small-cell lung cancer (LS-SCLC) remains poorly defined, with limited comparative data available against concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT). This retrospective multicenter study evaluated the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy, chemotherapy, and CCRT in treatment-naive patients with potentially resectable SCLC. A total of 139 patients treated between February 2019 and December 2023 were included: 55 received CCRT, and 84 underwent neoadjuvant therapy followed by surgery (28 immunochemotherapy, 56 chemotherapy). Complete (R0) resection was achieved in all surgical cases. The pathological complete response (pCR) rate was significantly higher in the immunochemotherapy group than in the chemotherapy group (35.7% vs. 7.1%, p < .05), as was the major pathological response (MPR) rate (53.6% vs. 12.5%, p < .05). Adverse events were acceptable in the three groups. After propensity score matching (PSM), 24 patients from each group were included for survival analysis. Although median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were not reached in the immunochemotherapy group, Kaplan-Meier analysis showed significantly prolonged PFS and OS compared with both chemotherapy and CCRT. These results suggest that neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy is a safe and effective treatment strategy for LS-SCLC and merits further investigation in prospective trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":180,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Cancer","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.70153","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The clinical value of neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy in limited-stage small-cell lung cancer (LS-SCLC) remains poorly defined, with limited comparative data available against concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT). This retrospective multicenter study evaluated the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy, chemotherapy, and CCRT in treatment-naive patients with potentially resectable SCLC. A total of 139 patients treated between February 2019 and December 2023 were included: 55 received CCRT, and 84 underwent neoadjuvant therapy followed by surgery (28 immunochemotherapy, 56 chemotherapy). Complete (R0) resection was achieved in all surgical cases. The pathological complete response (pCR) rate was significantly higher in the immunochemotherapy group than in the chemotherapy group (35.7% vs. 7.1%, p < .05), as was the major pathological response (MPR) rate (53.6% vs. 12.5%, p < .05). Adverse events were acceptable in the three groups. After propensity score matching (PSM), 24 patients from each group were included for survival analysis. Although median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were not reached in the immunochemotherapy group, Kaplan-Meier analysis showed significantly prolonged PFS and OS compared with both chemotherapy and CCRT. These results suggest that neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy is a safe and effective treatment strategy for LS-SCLC and merits further investigation in prospective trials.

在有限期小细胞肺癌中,新辅助免疫化疗或化疗与同步放化疗的临床结果:一项回顾性、多中心、真实世界的研究
新辅助免疫化疗在有限期小细胞肺癌(LS-SCLC)中的临床价值仍不明确,与同步放化疗(CCRT)的比较数据有限。这项回顾性多中心研究评估了新辅助免疫化疗、化疗和CCRT对未接受治疗的潜在可切除SCLC患者的疗效和安全性。2019年2月至2023年12月共纳入139例患者:55例接受CCRT, 84例接受新辅助治疗后手术(28例免疫化疗,56例化疗)。所有手术病例均获得完全(R0)切除。免疫化疗组病理完全缓解率(pCR)明显高于化疗组(35.7% vs. 7.1%, p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.40
自引率
3.10%
发文量
460
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Cancer (IJC) is the official journal of the Union for International Cancer Control—UICC; it appears twice a month. IJC invites submission of manuscripts under a broad scope of topics relevant to experimental and clinical cancer research and publishes original Research Articles and Short Reports under the following categories: -Cancer Epidemiology- Cancer Genetics and Epigenetics- Infectious Causes of Cancer- Innovative Tools and Methods- Molecular Cancer Biology- Tumor Immunology and Microenvironment- Tumor Markers and Signatures- Cancer Therapy and Prevention
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信