Parent–child contact during placement and mental health: A meta-analysis

IF 1.8 3区 社会学 Q2 FAMILY STUDIES
Camille Danner Touati, Aino E. Sirparanta, Karine Dubois-Comtois, Emylie Giguère, Raphaële Miljkovitch
{"title":"Parent–child contact during placement and mental health: A meta-analysis","authors":"Camille Danner Touati,&nbsp;Aino E. Sirparanta,&nbsp;Karine Dubois-Comtois,&nbsp;Emylie Giguère,&nbsp;Raphaële Miljkovitch","doi":"10.1111/fare.13204","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>This meta-analysis aimed to synthesize research findings on the association between contact with biological parents and mental health in the context of out-of-home care.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Although contact with biological parents is the primary intervention for maintaining the relationship with placed children, the consequences on child mental health are still unknown.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Method</h3>\n \n <p>Six electronic databases were searched for published and unpublished studies and dissertations.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Twenty studies comprising 96 effect sizes (<i>N</i> = 5,276) were included. Findings from a three-level random effects meta-analysis revealed that the combined effect of contact with biological parents on mental health was not significant (<i>k</i> = 20, <i>u</i> = 96, <i>r</i> = .02). Moderation analyses revealed weaker effect sizes in samples with greater proportions of children who were physically abused or placed in nonrelative foster care. Conversely, parental visitation was more strongly associated with mental health outcomes in samples in which frequency of contact was at least weekly.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Regular parental visitation (at least weekly) is associated with better mental health outcomes. However, the benefits of parental visitation are reduced among physically abused children and those placed in nonrelative foster care.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Implications</h3>\n \n <p>Moderator analyses suggest that considering parental visitation to be beneficial for children is an oversimplification. Instead, child welfare services should prioritize examination of factors associated with positive parent–child contact for optimal visitation measures.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48206,"journal":{"name":"Family Relations","volume":"74 4","pages":"2017-2039"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/fare.13204","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Family Relations","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/fare.13204","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

This meta-analysis aimed to synthesize research findings on the association between contact with biological parents and mental health in the context of out-of-home care.

Background

Although contact with biological parents is the primary intervention for maintaining the relationship with placed children, the consequences on child mental health are still unknown.

Method

Six electronic databases were searched for published and unpublished studies and dissertations.

Results

Twenty studies comprising 96 effect sizes (N = 5,276) were included. Findings from a three-level random effects meta-analysis revealed that the combined effect of contact with biological parents on mental health was not significant (k = 20, u = 96, r = .02). Moderation analyses revealed weaker effect sizes in samples with greater proportions of children who were physically abused or placed in nonrelative foster care. Conversely, parental visitation was more strongly associated with mental health outcomes in samples in which frequency of contact was at least weekly.

Conclusion

Regular parental visitation (at least weekly) is associated with better mental health outcomes. However, the benefits of parental visitation are reduced among physically abused children and those placed in nonrelative foster care.

Implications

Moderator analyses suggest that considering parental visitation to be beneficial for children is an oversimplification. Instead, child welfare services should prioritize examination of factors associated with positive parent–child contact for optimal visitation measures.

Abstract Image

安置期间亲子接触与心理健康:一项荟萃分析
目的本荟萃分析旨在综合家庭外护理背景下与亲生父母接触与心理健康关系的研究结果。背景:虽然与亲生父母接触是维持与被安置儿童关系的主要干预措施,但对儿童心理健康的影响尚不清楚。方法检索6个电子数据库中已发表和未发表的研究和论文。结果纳入20项研究,共96个效应量(N = 5276)。三水平随机效应荟萃分析结果显示,与亲生父母接触对心理健康的综合影响不显著(k = 20, u = 96, r = 0.02)。适度分析显示,在受到身体虐待或被置于非亲属寄养的儿童比例较大的样本中,效应值较弱。相反,在接触频率至少为每周一次的样本中,父母探视与心理健康结果的关系更为密切。结论定期父母探视(至少每周一次)与较好的心理健康状况相关。然而,父母探视的好处在身体受虐待的儿童和那些被安置在非亲属寄养的儿童中有所减少。影响调节分析表明,认为父母探视对孩子有益是一种过度简化。相反,儿童福利服务机构应该优先审查与积极的亲子接触有关的因素,以获得最佳的探视措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Family Relations
Family Relations Multiple-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
13.60%
发文量
164
期刊介绍: A premier, applied journal of family studies, Family Relations is mandatory reading for family scholars and all professionals who work with families, including: family practitioners, educators, marriage and family therapists, researchers, and social policy specialists. The journal"s content emphasizes family research with implications for intervention, education, and public policy, always publishing original, innovative and interdisciplinary works with specific recommendations for practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信