Camille Danner Touati, Aino E. Sirparanta, Karine Dubois-Comtois, Emylie Giguère, Raphaële Miljkovitch
{"title":"Parent–child contact during placement and mental health: A meta-analysis","authors":"Camille Danner Touati, Aino E. Sirparanta, Karine Dubois-Comtois, Emylie Giguère, Raphaële Miljkovitch","doi":"10.1111/fare.13204","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>This meta-analysis aimed to synthesize research findings on the association between contact with biological parents and mental health in the context of out-of-home care.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Although contact with biological parents is the primary intervention for maintaining the relationship with placed children, the consequences on child mental health are still unknown.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Method</h3>\n \n <p>Six electronic databases were searched for published and unpublished studies and dissertations.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Twenty studies comprising 96 effect sizes (<i>N</i> = 5,276) were included. Findings from a three-level random effects meta-analysis revealed that the combined effect of contact with biological parents on mental health was not significant (<i>k</i> = 20, <i>u</i> = 96, <i>r</i> = .02). Moderation analyses revealed weaker effect sizes in samples with greater proportions of children who were physically abused or placed in nonrelative foster care. Conversely, parental visitation was more strongly associated with mental health outcomes in samples in which frequency of contact was at least weekly.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Regular parental visitation (at least weekly) is associated with better mental health outcomes. However, the benefits of parental visitation are reduced among physically abused children and those placed in nonrelative foster care.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Implications</h3>\n \n <p>Moderator analyses suggest that considering parental visitation to be beneficial for children is an oversimplification. Instead, child welfare services should prioritize examination of factors associated with positive parent–child contact for optimal visitation measures.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48206,"journal":{"name":"Family Relations","volume":"74 4","pages":"2017-2039"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/fare.13204","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Family Relations","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/fare.13204","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
This meta-analysis aimed to synthesize research findings on the association between contact with biological parents and mental health in the context of out-of-home care.
Background
Although contact with biological parents is the primary intervention for maintaining the relationship with placed children, the consequences on child mental health are still unknown.
Method
Six electronic databases were searched for published and unpublished studies and dissertations.
Results
Twenty studies comprising 96 effect sizes (N = 5,276) were included. Findings from a three-level random effects meta-analysis revealed that the combined effect of contact with biological parents on mental health was not significant (k = 20, u = 96, r = .02). Moderation analyses revealed weaker effect sizes in samples with greater proportions of children who were physically abused or placed in nonrelative foster care. Conversely, parental visitation was more strongly associated with mental health outcomes in samples in which frequency of contact was at least weekly.
Conclusion
Regular parental visitation (at least weekly) is associated with better mental health outcomes. However, the benefits of parental visitation are reduced among physically abused children and those placed in nonrelative foster care.
Implications
Moderator analyses suggest that considering parental visitation to be beneficial for children is an oversimplification. Instead, child welfare services should prioritize examination of factors associated with positive parent–child contact for optimal visitation measures.
期刊介绍:
A premier, applied journal of family studies, Family Relations is mandatory reading for family scholars and all professionals who work with families, including: family practitioners, educators, marriage and family therapists, researchers, and social policy specialists. The journal"s content emphasizes family research with implications for intervention, education, and public policy, always publishing original, innovative and interdisciplinary works with specific recommendations for practice.