Panchalie B. Gunathunga, Merveille Muyizere, B. H. King
{"title":"Response of various body parts of house flies, Musca domestica, to sucrose","authors":"Panchalie B. Gunathunga, Merveille Muyizere, B. H. King","doi":"10.1111/eea.13612","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Insects use multiple body parts, not just their mouth, to taste. Whether a particular body part has a taste function can be determined by examining the morphology or electrophysiological response of its sensilla (sense organs) or by its behavioral response. This study investigated the taste response of each of the three pairs of tarsi, tibiae, femurs, as well as the antennae and wings, in house flies, <i>Musca domestica</i> L. (Diptera: Muscidae). This was done by measuring the proboscis extension response (PER), and in the case of the wings, also the grooming behavior. PER is a visible precursor to consumption. The fore, middle, and hind tarsi of both male and female house flies distinguished between sucrose solution versus water. The fore tibiae and femurs of females and the middle femurs of males also made this distinction. Of the body parts tested, the middle, and especially the fore, tarsi were the ones most responsive to sucrose. Contact of aristae (part of the antennae) did not elicit PER regardless of whether contact was with a toothpick that had been soaked in sucrose, water, or nothing. For both males and females, neither the proportion of flies exhibiting PER nor the duration of grooming was significantly affected by whether the anterior wing margin was contacted with a toothpick that had been soaked in sucrose, water, or a dry toothpick.</p>","PeriodicalId":11741,"journal":{"name":"Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata","volume":"173 10","pages":"1123-1131"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/eea.13612","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENTOMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Insects use multiple body parts, not just their mouth, to taste. Whether a particular body part has a taste function can be determined by examining the morphology or electrophysiological response of its sensilla (sense organs) or by its behavioral response. This study investigated the taste response of each of the three pairs of tarsi, tibiae, femurs, as well as the antennae and wings, in house flies, Musca domestica L. (Diptera: Muscidae). This was done by measuring the proboscis extension response (PER), and in the case of the wings, also the grooming behavior. PER is a visible precursor to consumption. The fore, middle, and hind tarsi of both male and female house flies distinguished between sucrose solution versus water. The fore tibiae and femurs of females and the middle femurs of males also made this distinction. Of the body parts tested, the middle, and especially the fore, tarsi were the ones most responsive to sucrose. Contact of aristae (part of the antennae) did not elicit PER regardless of whether contact was with a toothpick that had been soaked in sucrose, water, or nothing. For both males and females, neither the proportion of flies exhibiting PER nor the duration of grooming was significantly affected by whether the anterior wing margin was contacted with a toothpick that had been soaked in sucrose, water, or a dry toothpick.
期刊介绍:
Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata publishes top quality original research papers in the fields of experimental biology and ecology of insects and other terrestrial arthropods, with both pure and applied scopes. Mini-reviews, technical notes and media reviews are also published. Although the scope of the journal covers the entire scientific field of entomology, it has established itself as the preferred medium for the communication of results in the areas of the physiological, ecological, and morphological inter-relations between phytophagous arthropods and their food plants, their parasitoids, predators, and pathogens. Examples of specific areas that are covered frequently are:
host-plant selection mechanisms
chemical and sensory ecology and infochemicals
parasitoid-host interactions
behavioural ecology
biosystematics
(co-)evolution
migration and dispersal
population modelling
sampling strategies
developmental and behavioural responses to photoperiod and temperature
nutrition
natural and transgenic plant resistance.