An integrative review of family supports as components of early childhood home visiting models

IF 1.8 3区 社会学 Q2 FAMILY STUDIES
Cinda Clark, Kallen Shaw, Patricia Snyder, Maureen Conroy, Helena Mawdsley
{"title":"An integrative review of family supports as components of early childhood home visiting models","authors":"Cinda Clark,&nbsp;Kallen Shaw,&nbsp;Patricia Snyder,&nbsp;Maureen Conroy,&nbsp;Helena Mawdsley","doi":"10.1111/fare.70001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>We conducted an integrative review to identify family support categories that have been described as components of early childhood home visiting models in empirical research and to distinguish whether supports were formal or informal.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Key components of most early childhood home visiting models include family supports intended to promote child and family outcomes. Categories of family support have been described in other extant literature: (a) material, (b) informational, (c) social–emotional, and (d) organizational. Family support has been further categorized as formal or informal. In this literature, informal supports have been characterized as more enduring and meaningful than formal ones.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Method</h3>\n \n <p>A systematic literature search was conducted. A total of 244 studies representing 127 early childhood home visiting models were located and coded.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Formal informational supports were the most frequently reported family support category. Informal supports were reported much less frequently than formal supports.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Given the enduring impacts of informal family supports, home visiting models should include both informal and formal supports. Empirical studies should include descriptions of the types of family supports in home visiting models and more explicitly hypothesize linkages to intended outcomes.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Implications</h3>\n \n <p>Future work should include refining the definitions of support categories, distinguishing informal and formal supports, exploring interactions among supports, and understanding the functions of supports from the perspectives of families and home visitors.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48206,"journal":{"name":"Family Relations","volume":"74 4","pages":"1961-1978"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Family Relations","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/fare.70001","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

We conducted an integrative review to identify family support categories that have been described as components of early childhood home visiting models in empirical research and to distinguish whether supports were formal or informal.

Background

Key components of most early childhood home visiting models include family supports intended to promote child and family outcomes. Categories of family support have been described in other extant literature: (a) material, (b) informational, (c) social–emotional, and (d) organizational. Family support has been further categorized as formal or informal. In this literature, informal supports have been characterized as more enduring and meaningful than formal ones.

Method

A systematic literature search was conducted. A total of 244 studies representing 127 early childhood home visiting models were located and coded.

Results

Formal informational supports were the most frequently reported family support category. Informal supports were reported much less frequently than formal supports.

Conclusion

Given the enduring impacts of informal family supports, home visiting models should include both informal and formal supports. Empirical studies should include descriptions of the types of family supports in home visiting models and more explicitly hypothesize linkages to intended outcomes.

Implications

Future work should include refining the definitions of support categories, distinguishing informal and formal supports, exploring interactions among supports, and understanding the functions of supports from the perspectives of families and home visitors.

家庭支持作为早期儿童家访模式组成部分的综合回顾
目的对实证研究中被描述为早期儿童家访模型组成部分的家庭支持类别进行综合评价,并区分支持是正式的还是非正式的。大多数早期儿童家访模式的关键组成部分包括旨在促进儿童和家庭成果的家庭支持。其他现存文献描述了家庭支持的类别:(a)物质支持,(b)信息支持,(c)社会情感支持,(d)组织支持。家庭支助又进一步分为正式支助和非正式支助。在这一文献中,非正式支持的特点是比正式支持更持久、更有意义。方法进行系统的文献检索。对代表127种幼儿家访模式的244项研究进行了定位和编码。结果正式的信息支持是最常见的家庭支持类别。非正式支助的报告比正式支助少得多。结论考虑到非正式家庭支持的持久影响,家访模式应包括非正式支持和正式支持。实证研究应包括对家访模式中家庭支持类型的描述,并更明确地假设与预期结果的联系。未来的工作应包括完善支持类别的定义,区分非正式支持和正式支持,探索支持之间的相互作用,以及从家庭和家访者的角度理解支持的功能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Family Relations
Family Relations Multiple-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
13.60%
发文量
164
期刊介绍: A premier, applied journal of family studies, Family Relations is mandatory reading for family scholars and all professionals who work with families, including: family practitioners, educators, marriage and family therapists, researchers, and social policy specialists. The journal"s content emphasizes family research with implications for intervention, education, and public policy, always publishing original, innovative and interdisciplinary works with specific recommendations for practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信