LGBTQ parent–child relationships with nonaffirming Christian parents

IF 1.8 3区 社会学 Q2 FAMILY STUDIES
Sloan Okrey Anderson
{"title":"LGBTQ parent–child relationships with nonaffirming Christian parents","authors":"Sloan Okrey Anderson","doi":"10.1111/fare.13196","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>This paper explores the family experiences of LGBTQ people growing up in nonaffirming, American Christian families.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Previous research has established the importance of parental support for LGBTQ people. However, scholarship exploring family roles and relationships in the context of theological nonaffirmation is less robust and has primarily sampled parents exclusively.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Method</h3>\n \n <p>Surveys, genograms, and in-depth interviews were completed with 17 LGBTQ people and 17 of their siblings. Data were analyzed using inductive thematic analysis, informed by critical feminist theory.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Results indicated that for LGBTQ participants, the absence of explicit theological affirmation (ETA) from parents contributed to a deterioration of trust and emotional closeness in parent–child relationships. Even when reactions to disclosure were described as positive and warm, and even when parents provided identity-specific support, the absence of ETA left LGBTQ participants with an acute sense of relational ambiguity, grief, and loss. Additionally, acts of reparation were identified as meaningful building blocks of positive, trusting, parent–child relationships.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>ETA from parents may be a core component in the formation, repair, and maintenance of positive parent–child relationships for LGBTQ people who were raised in nonaffirming Christian families.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Implications</h3>\n \n <p>Previous research has asserted that parental religious beliefs are not a barrier to healthy parent–child relationship for LGBTQ people. This study contributes to a growing body of scholarship suggesting that ETA is an important part of healthy parent–child relationships for LGBTQ people. Mental health practitioners may want to incorporate affirmation-oriented interventions when working with religious families of LGBTQ people.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48206,"journal":{"name":"Family Relations","volume":"74 4","pages":"1695-1721"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Family Relations","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/fare.13196","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

This paper explores the family experiences of LGBTQ people growing up in nonaffirming, American Christian families.

Background

Previous research has established the importance of parental support for LGBTQ people. However, scholarship exploring family roles and relationships in the context of theological nonaffirmation is less robust and has primarily sampled parents exclusively.

Method

Surveys, genograms, and in-depth interviews were completed with 17 LGBTQ people and 17 of their siblings. Data were analyzed using inductive thematic analysis, informed by critical feminist theory.

Results

Results indicated that for LGBTQ participants, the absence of explicit theological affirmation (ETA) from parents contributed to a deterioration of trust and emotional closeness in parent–child relationships. Even when reactions to disclosure were described as positive and warm, and even when parents provided identity-specific support, the absence of ETA left LGBTQ participants with an acute sense of relational ambiguity, grief, and loss. Additionally, acts of reparation were identified as meaningful building blocks of positive, trusting, parent–child relationships.

Conclusion

ETA from parents may be a core component in the formation, repair, and maintenance of positive parent–child relationships for LGBTQ people who were raised in nonaffirming Christian families.

Implications

Previous research has asserted that parental religious beliefs are not a barrier to healthy parent–child relationship for LGBTQ people. This study contributes to a growing body of scholarship suggesting that ETA is an important part of healthy parent–child relationships for LGBTQ people. Mental health practitioners may want to incorporate affirmation-oriented interventions when working with religious families of LGBTQ people.

LGBTQ与非肯定基督徒父母的亲子关系
目的探讨在非肯定的美国基督教家庭中成长的LGBTQ人群的家庭经历。之前的研究已经确定了父母支持对LGBTQ人群的重要性。然而,在神学不肯定的背景下探索家庭角色和关系的学术研究不那么有力,主要是对父母的独家抽样。方法对17名LGBTQ人群及其17名兄弟姐妹进行问卷调查、家谱分析和深度访谈。数据分析采用归纳主题分析,告知批判女性主义理论。结果结果表明,LGBTQ参与者缺乏父母明确的神学肯定(ETA)会导致亲子关系中的信任和情感亲密度下降。即使对披露的反应被描述为积极和温暖,即使父母提供了特定身份的支持,ETA的缺失也会让LGBTQ参与者产生一种强烈的关系模糊感、悲伤和失落感。此外,修复行为被认为是积极的、信任的、亲子关系的有意义的基石。结论来自父母的ETA可能是在非肯定基督教家庭中长大的LGBTQ人群形成、修复和维持积极亲子关系的核心组成部分。先前的研究表明,对于LGBTQ人群来说,父母的宗教信仰并不是健康亲子关系的障碍。这项研究为越来越多的学者提出ETA是LGBTQ人群健康亲子关系的重要组成部分做出了贡献。心理健康从业者在与LGBTQ人群的宗教家庭合作时,可能想要纳入以肯定为导向的干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Family Relations
Family Relations Multiple-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
13.60%
发文量
164
期刊介绍: A premier, applied journal of family studies, Family Relations is mandatory reading for family scholars and all professionals who work with families, including: family practitioners, educators, marriage and family therapists, researchers, and social policy specialists. The journal"s content emphasizes family research with implications for intervention, education, and public policy, always publishing original, innovative and interdisciplinary works with specific recommendations for practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信