Assessing child-to-parent violence: Measures of invariance and frequencies in young adults

IF 1.8 3区 社会学 Q2 FAMILY STUDIES
Luis Burgos-Benavides, M. Carmen Cano-Lozano, Andrés Ramírez, M. D. Palacios, Hugo Fernando Sinchi Sinchi, Francisco Javier Rodríguez-Díaz
{"title":"Assessing child-to-parent violence: Measures of invariance and frequencies in young adults","authors":"Luis Burgos-Benavides,&nbsp;M. Carmen Cano-Lozano,&nbsp;Andrés Ramírez,&nbsp;M. D. Palacios,&nbsp;Hugo Fernando Sinchi Sinchi,&nbsp;Francisco Javier Rodríguez-Díaz","doi":"10.1111/fare.13170","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>The main objective was to analyze the reliability, psychometric properties, and validity evidence of the Child-to-Parent Violence Questionnaire (CPV-Q) youth version with an Ecuadorian sample.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>CPV is a form of youth violence in which children engage in violent behavior toward their parents. Previous studies have reported that CPV extends beyond the age of 18 years.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Method</h3>\n \n <p>In this study 1,516 intentionally selected young adults aged 18–26 years participated. They completed a sociodemographic form and the CPV-Q for CPV behaviors. Several factor analyses were carried out; reliability indices, invariance by sex of the young adults, convergent and discriminant validity, and percentages by type of CPV toward both parents were calculated.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The CPV-Q has an excellent psychometric model, as well as good reliability and evidence of validity. Psychological CPV was the most frequent between 43.9% and 52.3%. Physical CPV was the least exercised between 1.9% and 3.4%.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>CPV is a type of family violence that can be assessed and identified with the CPV-Q. This scale presents adequate measurement indicators. In addition, percentages of the types of CPV are shown.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Implications</h3>\n \n <p>It provides an adapted, reliable psychometric instrument supported by strong validity evidence for the assessment of the CPV-Q in young adults. It can be used by professionals working in different areas related to family violence. The main implication for future prevention and intervention studies is that this instrument can be used in longitudinal studies and for the development of explanatory models of this problem.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48206,"journal":{"name":"Family Relations","volume":"74 4","pages":"2167-2184"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/fare.13170","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Family Relations","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/fare.13170","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

The main objective was to analyze the reliability, psychometric properties, and validity evidence of the Child-to-Parent Violence Questionnaire (CPV-Q) youth version with an Ecuadorian sample.

Background

CPV is a form of youth violence in which children engage in violent behavior toward their parents. Previous studies have reported that CPV extends beyond the age of 18 years.

Method

In this study 1,516 intentionally selected young adults aged 18–26 years participated. They completed a sociodemographic form and the CPV-Q for CPV behaviors. Several factor analyses were carried out; reliability indices, invariance by sex of the young adults, convergent and discriminant validity, and percentages by type of CPV toward both parents were calculated.

Results

The CPV-Q has an excellent psychometric model, as well as good reliability and evidence of validity. Psychological CPV was the most frequent between 43.9% and 52.3%. Physical CPV was the least exercised between 1.9% and 3.4%.

Conclusion

CPV is a type of family violence that can be assessed and identified with the CPV-Q. This scale presents adequate measurement indicators. In addition, percentages of the types of CPV are shown.

Implications

It provides an adapted, reliable psychometric instrument supported by strong validity evidence for the assessment of the CPV-Q in young adults. It can be used by professionals working in different areas related to family violence. The main implication for future prevention and intervention studies is that this instrument can be used in longitudinal studies and for the development of explanatory models of this problem.

评估孩子对父母的暴力:测量年轻人的不变性和频率
目的对厄瓜多尔青少年版《亲子暴力问卷》(CPV-Q)的信度、心理测量特征和效度证据进行分析。CPV是青少年暴力的一种形式,指的是儿童对父母采取暴力行为。先前的研究报道CPV会延续到18岁以后。方法在本研究中有意选择1516名年龄在18-26岁的年轻人参与。他们完成了一份社会人口统计表格和CPV- q的CPV行为。进行了多项因素分析;计算信度指标、青年性别的不变性、收敛效度和判别效度以及对父母双方CPV类型的百分比。结果CPV-Q量表具有良好的心理测量模型,具有良好的信度和证据效度。心理CPV发生率最高,为43.9% ~ 52.3%。身体CPV运动最少,在1.9%到3.4%之间。结论CPV是一种可以用CPV- q进行评估和识别的家庭暴力类型。该量表提供了充分的测量指标。此外,还显示了CPV类型的百分比。它为年轻人的CPV-Q评估提供了一个适应性的、可靠的心理测量工具,并得到了强有力的效度证据的支持。在与家庭暴力有关的不同领域工作的专业人员可以使用它。对未来预防和干预研究的主要含义是,该工具可以用于纵向研究,并用于该问题的解释模型的发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Family Relations
Family Relations Multiple-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
13.60%
发文量
164
期刊介绍: A premier, applied journal of family studies, Family Relations is mandatory reading for family scholars and all professionals who work with families, including: family practitioners, educators, marriage and family therapists, researchers, and social policy specialists. The journal"s content emphasizes family research with implications for intervention, education, and public policy, always publishing original, innovative and interdisciplinary works with specific recommendations for practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信