Megnath Ramesh;Frank Imeson;Baris Fidan;Stephen L. Smith
{"title":"Minimum-Length Coverage Path Planning for Grid Environments With Approximation Guarantees","authors":"Megnath Ramesh;Frank Imeson;Baris Fidan;Stephen L. Smith","doi":"10.1109/LRA.2025.3604732","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We focus on planning minimum-length robot paths to cover environments using the robot's sensor or coverage (e.g., cleaning) tool. Many algorithms use the following framework: (i) compute a grid decomposition of the environment, (ii) partition the grid to be covered by non-overlapping <italic>coverage lines</i> (straight-line paths), and (iii) compute a cost-minimizing tour of the coverage lines to get a coverage path. While this framework aims to minimize turns in the path, it does not yield guarantees on the resulting path length. In this letter, we show that this framework guarantees a coverage path of length <inline-formula><tex-math>$(1 + 1.5\\gamma)$</tex-math></inline-formula> times the optimal, where <inline-formula><tex-math>$\\gamma > 1$</tex-math></inline-formula> is the approximation factor to solve the metric traveling salesman problem (metric-TSP). Following this, we propose the Minimum Length Coverage Approx (MLC-Approx) approach that modifies this framework to achieve an approximation factor of <inline-formula><tex-math>$(1.5 + \\epsilon)$</tex-math></inline-formula>, where <inline-formula><tex-math>$\\epsilon \\ll 1$</tex-math></inline-formula> depends on the number of coverage lines. Instead of computing a tour of the coverage lines, MLC-Approx merges minimum-length <italic>sub-tours</i> of coverage lines while minimizing the turns added by the merges. We also propose a lazy variation of MLC-Approx that achieves the same result with faster empirical runtime. We validate MLC-Approx in simulations using maps of real-world environments and compare against state-of-the-art CPP approaches.","PeriodicalId":13241,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters","volume":"10 10","pages":"10674-10681"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/11146610/","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ROBOTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
We focus on planning minimum-length robot paths to cover environments using the robot's sensor or coverage (e.g., cleaning) tool. Many algorithms use the following framework: (i) compute a grid decomposition of the environment, (ii) partition the grid to be covered by non-overlapping coverage lines (straight-line paths), and (iii) compute a cost-minimizing tour of the coverage lines to get a coverage path. While this framework aims to minimize turns in the path, it does not yield guarantees on the resulting path length. In this letter, we show that this framework guarantees a coverage path of length $(1 + 1.5\gamma)$ times the optimal, where $\gamma > 1$ is the approximation factor to solve the metric traveling salesman problem (metric-TSP). Following this, we propose the Minimum Length Coverage Approx (MLC-Approx) approach that modifies this framework to achieve an approximation factor of $(1.5 + \epsilon)$, where $\epsilon \ll 1$ depends on the number of coverage lines. Instead of computing a tour of the coverage lines, MLC-Approx merges minimum-length sub-tours of coverage lines while minimizing the turns added by the merges. We also propose a lazy variation of MLC-Approx that achieves the same result with faster empirical runtime. We validate MLC-Approx in simulations using maps of real-world environments and compare against state-of-the-art CPP approaches.
期刊介绍:
The scope of this journal is to publish peer-reviewed articles that provide a timely and concise account of innovative research ideas and application results, reporting significant theoretical findings and application case studies in areas of robotics and automation.