Do men and women navigate differently in virtual environments? A comparative study

IF 5.1 2区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, CYBERNETICS
Pinyan Tang, Yuye Liao, Kun Zheng, Yifeng Sheng, Wenjie Ren, Chuan Liu, Yuqi Li
{"title":"Do men and women navigate differently in virtual environments? A comparative study","authors":"Pinyan Tang,&nbsp;Yuye Liao,&nbsp;Kun Zheng,&nbsp;Yifeng Sheng,&nbsp;Wenjie Ren,&nbsp;Chuan Liu,&nbsp;Yuqi Li","doi":"10.1016/j.ijhcs.2025.103621","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study investigates the effects of gender and training interventions on spatial navigation in VR. Thirty-eight participants, divided into male and female intervention and control groups, performed a dual-task involving coin collection and destination location in a large-scale urban VR environment. Performance metrics included the number of coins collected, time taken to reach the destination, and eye-tracking data, normalised for task difficulty. While pre-test performance revealed no significant gender differences, eye movement data highlighted baseline gender differences in gaze patterns, with females exhibiting more exploratory behaviour. Training interventions led to performance improvements, particularly for females, whose gains remained statistically significant after Bonferroni correction. These improvements were accompanied by successful transitions between egocentric and allocentric strategies, as evidenced by gaze data and post-hoc interviews. For males, the intervention led to mixed results, with improvements in performance but a trade-off in efficiency. These findings deepen our understanding of how gender and training influence navigation strategies in VR and inform the design of future VR training systems, emphasising the importance of balancing cognitive load and strategy selection.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54955,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Human-Computer Studies","volume":"205 ","pages":"Article 103621"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Human-Computer Studies","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1071581925001788","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, CYBERNETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigates the effects of gender and training interventions on spatial navigation in VR. Thirty-eight participants, divided into male and female intervention and control groups, performed a dual-task involving coin collection and destination location in a large-scale urban VR environment. Performance metrics included the number of coins collected, time taken to reach the destination, and eye-tracking data, normalised for task difficulty. While pre-test performance revealed no significant gender differences, eye movement data highlighted baseline gender differences in gaze patterns, with females exhibiting more exploratory behaviour. Training interventions led to performance improvements, particularly for females, whose gains remained statistically significant after Bonferroni correction. These improvements were accompanied by successful transitions between egocentric and allocentric strategies, as evidenced by gaze data and post-hoc interviews. For males, the intervention led to mixed results, with improvements in performance but a trade-off in efficiency. These findings deepen our understanding of how gender and training influence navigation strategies in VR and inform the design of future VR training systems, emphasising the importance of balancing cognitive load and strategy selection.
在虚拟环境中,男性和女性的导航方式不同吗?比较研究
本研究探讨了性别和训练干预对虚拟现实空间导航的影响。38名参与者被分为男性和女性干预组和对照组,他们在一个大型城市VR环境中执行了一项双重任务,包括硬币收集和目的地定位。性能指标包括收集的硬币数量,到达目的地所需的时间,以及根据任务难度标准化的眼球追踪数据。虽然测试前的表现没有显示出明显的性别差异,但眼动数据突出了注视模式的基线性别差异,女性表现出更多的探索行为。训练干预导致了成绩的提高,尤其是对女性来说,在Bonferroni校正后,她们的成绩在统计上仍然显著。这些改进伴随着自我中心和非中心策略之间的成功过渡,正如凝视数据和事后访谈所证明的那样。对男性来说,干预带来了好坏参半的结果,表现有所改善,但效率却有所下降。这些发现加深了我们对性别和训练如何影响VR导航策略的理解,并为未来VR训练系统的设计提供了信息,强调了平衡认知负荷和策略选择的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Human-Computer Studies
International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 工程技术-计算机:控制论
CiteScore
11.50
自引率
5.60%
发文量
108
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Human-Computer Studies publishes original research over the whole spectrum of work relevant to the theory and practice of innovative interactive systems. The journal is inherently interdisciplinary, covering research in computing, artificial intelligence, psychology, linguistics, communication, design, engineering, and social organization, which is relevant to the design, analysis, evaluation and application of innovative interactive systems. Papers at the boundaries of these disciplines are especially welcome, as it is our view that interdisciplinary approaches are needed for producing theoretical insights in this complex area and for effective deployment of innovative technologies in concrete user communities. Research areas relevant to the journal include, but are not limited to: • Innovative interaction techniques • Multimodal interaction • Speech interaction • Graphic interaction • Natural language interaction • Interaction in mobile and embedded systems • Interface design and evaluation methodologies • Design and evaluation of innovative interactive systems • User interface prototyping and management systems • Ubiquitous computing • Wearable computers • Pervasive computing • Affective computing • Empirical studies of user behaviour • Empirical studies of programming and software engineering • Computer supported cooperative work • Computer mediated communication • Virtual reality • Mixed and augmented Reality • Intelligent user interfaces • Presence ...
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信