Indoor residential pesticide fate, transport, and exposure model

Noshin Anjum Kamal , Raghavendhran Avanasi , Carrie Huffman , Raj Saran , Tharacad Ramanarayanan , Deborah H. Bennett , Hyeong-Moo Shin
{"title":"Indoor residential pesticide fate, transport, and exposure model","authors":"Noshin Anjum Kamal ,&nbsp;Raghavendhran Avanasi ,&nbsp;Carrie Huffman ,&nbsp;Raj Saran ,&nbsp;Tharacad Ramanarayanan ,&nbsp;Deborah H. Bennett ,&nbsp;Hyeong-Moo Shin","doi":"10.1016/j.indenv.2025.100122","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>A deeper understanding of the fate, transport, and exposure of indoor pesticides is needed, especially for application methods specific to indoor environments, such as perimeter and crack-and-crevice treatments. This study addresses this research need by investigating indoor dynamics of pesticides and estimating residential pesticide exposures. For four widely-used pesticides with diverse chemical properties, we refined and applied our multi-compartment indoor fate, transport, and exposure model to simulate time-dependent concentrations across multiple media, integrating exposures over 1- and 30-day periods. Our model shows that when pesticides are applied to floor edges, &lt; 1 % of the total applied mass is transported from treated areas to air or untreated surfaces over 30 days of simulation. Because of limited measurement data for robust model validation, we compared our model’s estimates to those from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) regulatory model. Comparison revealed that our model’s total exposure estimates are 2–5 orders of magnitude lower than those from the SOP model. Notably, even greater differences were observed for individual exposure routes, as the SOP model does not account for chemical properties but assumes that a fixed daily fraction of the applied mass is available for exposure. In contrast, our model accounts for chemical-specific fate and transport processes. This study highlights the critical role of incorporating chemical fate and transport in residential pesticide exposure assessments. However, monitoring studies are needed to validate our model estimates with measurements collected over time from indoor air and surfaces under known application methods and rates.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100665,"journal":{"name":"Indoor Environments","volume":"2 4","pages":"Article 100122"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indoor Environments","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950362025000517","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A deeper understanding of the fate, transport, and exposure of indoor pesticides is needed, especially for application methods specific to indoor environments, such as perimeter and crack-and-crevice treatments. This study addresses this research need by investigating indoor dynamics of pesticides and estimating residential pesticide exposures. For four widely-used pesticides with diverse chemical properties, we refined and applied our multi-compartment indoor fate, transport, and exposure model to simulate time-dependent concentrations across multiple media, integrating exposures over 1- and 30-day periods. Our model shows that when pesticides are applied to floor edges, < 1 % of the total applied mass is transported from treated areas to air or untreated surfaces over 30 days of simulation. Because of limited measurement data for robust model validation, we compared our model’s estimates to those from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) regulatory model. Comparison revealed that our model’s total exposure estimates are 2–5 orders of magnitude lower than those from the SOP model. Notably, even greater differences were observed for individual exposure routes, as the SOP model does not account for chemical properties but assumes that a fixed daily fraction of the applied mass is available for exposure. In contrast, our model accounts for chemical-specific fate and transport processes. This study highlights the critical role of incorporating chemical fate and transport in residential pesticide exposure assessments. However, monitoring studies are needed to validate our model estimates with measurements collected over time from indoor air and surfaces under known application methods and rates.
室内住宅农药命运、运输和暴露模型
需要更深入地了解室内农药的命运,运输和暴露,特别是针对室内环境的应用方法,如周界和裂缝和缝隙处理。本研究通过调查室内农药动态和估计住宅农药暴露来解决这一研究需求。对于四种具有不同化学性质的广泛使用的农药,我们改进并应用了我们的多室室内命运、运输和暴露模型,以模拟多种介质中随时间变化的浓度,整合1天和30天的暴露时间。我们的模型表明,在30天的模拟过程中,当在地板边缘施用农药时,<; 1 %的总施用质量从处理区域输送到空气或未处理的表面。由于用于稳健模型验证的测量数据有限,我们将模型的估计与美国环境保护署标准操作程序(sop)监管模型的估计进行了比较。比较表明,我们模型的总暴露估计比SOP模型的估计低2-5个数量级。值得注意的是,由于SOP模型没有考虑化学性质,而是假设应用质量的固定每日部分可用于暴露,因此在个体暴露途径中观察到更大的差异。相比之下,我们的模型考虑了特定化学品的命运和运输过程。本研究强调了在住宅农药暴露评估中纳入化学命运和运输的关键作用。然而,需要监测研究来验证我们的模型估计,并在已知的应用方法和速率下从室内空气和表面收集随时间的测量数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信