{"title":"Problematizing language","authors":"Alexander V. Kravchenko","doi":"10.1016/j.langsci.2025.101758","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The article is a follow-up on the previously raised issue of the lack of language awareness on the part of both the general public and professional linguists of various theoretical strands. The different senses of the terms “language” and “natural language” used in linguistics and everyday life are discussed from the point of view of their empirical adequacy. It is argued that the arbitrariness and inconsistency of these terms issue from failure on the part of orthodox linguistics to understand the nature of language as a biological adaptation and its evolutionary function as a manner of living of human organism-environment systems. Such an understanding becomes possible by using Humberto Maturana's systems approach to language and cognition in the framework of radical constructivist epistemology. Such an approach may, finally, rescue language from the “blind zone” of linguistics, laying the ground for a new comprehensive transdisciplinary paradigm in the language sciences.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51592,"journal":{"name":"Language Sciences","volume":"113 ","pages":"Article 101758"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Language Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0388000125000531","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The article is a follow-up on the previously raised issue of the lack of language awareness on the part of both the general public and professional linguists of various theoretical strands. The different senses of the terms “language” and “natural language” used in linguistics and everyday life are discussed from the point of view of their empirical adequacy. It is argued that the arbitrariness and inconsistency of these terms issue from failure on the part of orthodox linguistics to understand the nature of language as a biological adaptation and its evolutionary function as a manner of living of human organism-environment systems. Such an understanding becomes possible by using Humberto Maturana's systems approach to language and cognition in the framework of radical constructivist epistemology. Such an approach may, finally, rescue language from the “blind zone” of linguistics, laying the ground for a new comprehensive transdisciplinary paradigm in the language sciences.
期刊介绍:
Language Sciences is a forum for debate, conducted so as to be of interest to the widest possible audience, on conceptual and theoretical issues in the various branches of general linguistics. The journal is also concerned with bringing to linguists attention current thinking about language within disciplines other than linguistics itself; relevant contributions from anthropologists, philosophers, psychologists and sociologists, among others, will be warmly received. In addition, the Editor is particularly keen to encourage the submission of essays on topics in the history and philosophy of language studies, and review articles discussing the import of significant recent works on language and linguistics.