Differences in microclimate of paved and green areas

IF 6.9 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Caroline Hoffmann , Achim Geissler , Andreas Wicki
{"title":"Differences in microclimate of paved and green areas","authors":"Caroline Hoffmann ,&nbsp;Achim Geissler ,&nbsp;Andreas Wicki","doi":"10.1016/j.uclim.2025.102595","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Rising temperatures in the urban environment due to climate change are leading to an increased interest in building materials and green infrastructure and their impact on the urban microclimate. When considering green infrastructure often the soil moisture is neglected. This publication explores this issue by measuring the microclimate over a sealed surface and a lawn under different moisture conditions. The measurements are compared with simulations using the ENVI-met software.</div><div>The results of the measurements show that during dry periods the temperature difference between the lawn and the paving becomes smaller and can even lead to higher temperatures over the lawn. During humid periods the temperature difference becomes greater, with higher temperatures over the paving. In terms of PET, the differences between the two surfaces are between 0.6 and 1.7 K.</div><div>The comparison between measurements and simulations were used to explore the reliability of the two available radiation models in the software in comparison to the measurement results. Concerning DBT<em>,</em> the deviations are very small. Deviations on a larger scale are found for MRT using both radiation models. Both findings are in line with the literature. The comparison of both radiation models shows that for the paving the “solar radiation model” performs better. Regarding the lawn both models perform almost equally.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48626,"journal":{"name":"Urban Climate","volume":"64 ","pages":"Article 102595"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urban Climate","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212095525003116","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rising temperatures in the urban environment due to climate change are leading to an increased interest in building materials and green infrastructure and their impact on the urban microclimate. When considering green infrastructure often the soil moisture is neglected. This publication explores this issue by measuring the microclimate over a sealed surface and a lawn under different moisture conditions. The measurements are compared with simulations using the ENVI-met software.
The results of the measurements show that during dry periods the temperature difference between the lawn and the paving becomes smaller and can even lead to higher temperatures over the lawn. During humid periods the temperature difference becomes greater, with higher temperatures over the paving. In terms of PET, the differences between the two surfaces are between 0.6 and 1.7 K.
The comparison between measurements and simulations were used to explore the reliability of the two available radiation models in the software in comparison to the measurement results. Concerning DBT, the deviations are very small. Deviations on a larger scale are found for MRT using both radiation models. Both findings are in line with the literature. The comparison of both radiation models shows that for the paving the “solar radiation model” performs better. Regarding the lawn both models perform almost equally.
铺砌区与绿地小气候的差异
气候变化导致城市环境温度上升,人们对建筑材料和绿色基础设施及其对城市小气候的影响越来越感兴趣。在考虑绿色基础设施时,土壤湿度往往被忽略。本出版物通过测量不同湿度条件下密封表面和草坪上的小气候来探讨这个问题。利用ENVI-met软件将测量结果与模拟结果进行了比较。测量结果表明,在干燥期间,草坪和铺装之间的温差变小,甚至可能导致草坪上的温度升高。在潮湿的季节,温差变得更大,铺路的温度更高。在PET方面,两种表面的差异在0.6 ~ 1.7 K之间。通过测量与模拟的对比,探讨了软件中两种可用辐射模型与测量结果的可靠性。对于DBT,偏差非常小。两种辐射模型的MRT均存在较大的偏差。这两项发现都与文献相符。两种辐射模型的比较表明,“太阳辐射模型”对铺装效果更好。对于草坪,两种模型的表现几乎相同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Urban Climate
Urban Climate Social Sciences-Urban Studies
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
9.40%
发文量
286
期刊介绍: Urban Climate serves the scientific and decision making communities with the publication of research on theory, science and applications relevant to understanding urban climatic conditions and change in relation to their geography and to demographic, socioeconomic, institutional, technological and environmental dynamics and global change. Targeted towards both disciplinary and interdisciplinary audiences, this journal publishes original research papers, comprehensive review articles, book reviews, and short communications on topics including, but not limited to, the following: Urban meteorology and climate[...] Urban environmental pollution[...] Adaptation to global change[...] Urban economic and social issues[...] Research Approaches[...]
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信