Quantitative habitat concentration analysis of triple negative breast cancer on MRI correlates with pathologic response to combination neoadjuvant immuno/chemotherapy
IF 1.5 4区 医学Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
R. Jared Weinfurtner , Dana Ataya , Kimberly Funaro , Asha Bhatt , Mahmoud Abdalah , Olya Stringfield , Natarajan Raghunand , Zachary Thompson , Marie C. Lee , Brian Czerniecki , Aixa Soyano Muller , Hatem Soliman , Hyo Han
{"title":"Quantitative habitat concentration analysis of triple negative breast cancer on MRI correlates with pathologic response to combination neoadjuvant immuno/chemotherapy","authors":"R. Jared Weinfurtner , Dana Ataya , Kimberly Funaro , Asha Bhatt , Mahmoud Abdalah , Olya Stringfield , Natarajan Raghunand , Zachary Thompson , Marie C. Lee , Brian Czerniecki , Aixa Soyano Muller , Hatem Soliman , Hyo Han","doi":"10.1016/j.clinimag.2025.110618","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To determine if quantitative volumetric habitat concentration analysis of triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) on pre-treatment MRI correlates with neoadjuvant treatment response in patients treated with combination Talimogene Laherparepvec (TVEC) neoadjuvant immunotherapy and chemotherapy (NAIC).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Patients with TNBC in a single institution phase I/II trial from 5/2017–9/2020 underwent pre-treatment breast MRI followed by ultrasound-guided intratumoral TVEC injections and NAC prior to surgery. Pre-treatment MRIs were evaluated quantitatively using functional tumor volume (FTV) assessment and temporal voxel intensity categorization (high vs low plus phase of peak) to establish percentage habitat concentrations (%HC) for each quantitative method. These were correlated with pathologic response at surgery. Statistical analyses were performed using Mann Whitney U and comparison of proportions tests, with <em>p</em> < 0.05 considered statistically significant.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Twenty-five female patients, aged 32–66 (avg 49), were included. Average %FTV and %High-Enhancement Volume (HEV) was 75.7 % and 87.1 %, respectively. Twelve patients (48 %) achieved pCR. On average, patients achieving pCR had higher %FTV (84.8 % vs 67.4 %, <em>p</em> = 0.022) and %HEV (93.3 % vs 81.3 %, <em>p</em> = 0.010). Patients with %HC above average for FTV and HEV also had lower average percent tumor cellularity (TC, 1 and 1.1 % vs 14.3 and 17.1 %, <em>p</em> = 0.023 and 0.003, respectively). Indeed, tumors with above average %FTV and %HEV achieved pCR in 71 % (10/14) and 69 % (11/16), respectively. In contrast, those below average achieved pCR in only 18 % (2/11) and 11 % (1/9), with <em>p</em> = 0.008 and 0.006, respectively.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Above-average concentration of functional tumor/high enhancement voxels within tumors before NAIC correlates with higher pCR rates and lower %TC at surgery.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50680,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Imaging","volume":"127 ","pages":"Article 110618"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0899707125002189","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
To determine if quantitative volumetric habitat concentration analysis of triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) on pre-treatment MRI correlates with neoadjuvant treatment response in patients treated with combination Talimogene Laherparepvec (TVEC) neoadjuvant immunotherapy and chemotherapy (NAIC).
Methods
Patients with TNBC in a single institution phase I/II trial from 5/2017–9/2020 underwent pre-treatment breast MRI followed by ultrasound-guided intratumoral TVEC injections and NAC prior to surgery. Pre-treatment MRIs were evaluated quantitatively using functional tumor volume (FTV) assessment and temporal voxel intensity categorization (high vs low plus phase of peak) to establish percentage habitat concentrations (%HC) for each quantitative method. These were correlated with pathologic response at surgery. Statistical analyses were performed using Mann Whitney U and comparison of proportions tests, with p < 0.05 considered statistically significant.
Results
Twenty-five female patients, aged 32–66 (avg 49), were included. Average %FTV and %High-Enhancement Volume (HEV) was 75.7 % and 87.1 %, respectively. Twelve patients (48 %) achieved pCR. On average, patients achieving pCR had higher %FTV (84.8 % vs 67.4 %, p = 0.022) and %HEV (93.3 % vs 81.3 %, p = 0.010). Patients with %HC above average for FTV and HEV also had lower average percent tumor cellularity (TC, 1 and 1.1 % vs 14.3 and 17.1 %, p = 0.023 and 0.003, respectively). Indeed, tumors with above average %FTV and %HEV achieved pCR in 71 % (10/14) and 69 % (11/16), respectively. In contrast, those below average achieved pCR in only 18 % (2/11) and 11 % (1/9), with p = 0.008 and 0.006, respectively.
Conclusion
Above-average concentration of functional tumor/high enhancement voxels within tumors before NAIC correlates with higher pCR rates and lower %TC at surgery.
期刊介绍:
The mission of Clinical Imaging is to publish, in a timely manner, the very best radiology research from the United States and around the world with special attention to the impact of medical imaging on patient care. The journal''s publications cover all imaging modalities, radiology issues related to patients, policy and practice improvements, and clinically-oriented imaging physics and informatics. The journal is a valuable resource for practicing radiologists, radiologists-in-training and other clinicians with an interest in imaging. Papers are carefully peer-reviewed and selected by our experienced subject editors who are leading experts spanning the range of imaging sub-specialties, which include:
-Body Imaging-
Breast Imaging-
Cardiothoracic Imaging-
Imaging Physics and Informatics-
Molecular Imaging and Nuclear Medicine-
Musculoskeletal and Emergency Imaging-
Neuroradiology-
Practice, Policy & Education-
Pediatric Imaging-
Vascular and Interventional Radiology