General evaluation and decision-making in primary vertebra tumors: WFNS spine committee recommendations

IF 0.5 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
İdris Avcı , Onur Yaman , Mehmet Zileli , Francesco Costa , Artem O. Gushcha , Zan Chen , Mirza Pojskic , Corinna C. Zygourakis , Salman Sharif
{"title":"General evaluation and decision-making in primary vertebra tumors: WFNS spine committee recommendations","authors":"İdris Avcı ,&nbsp;Onur Yaman ,&nbsp;Mehmet Zileli ,&nbsp;Francesco Costa ,&nbsp;Artem O. Gushcha ,&nbsp;Zan Chen ,&nbsp;Mirza Pojskic ,&nbsp;Corinna C. Zygourakis ,&nbsp;Salman Sharif","doi":"10.1016/j.inat.2025.102115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>Primary vertebral tumors (PVT) are rare neoplastic lesions distinct from metastatic spinal tumors. Due to their diverse nature and complex management, the World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies (WFNS) Spine Committee aimed to establish a consensus on the classification, diagnosis, and treatment of PVT to standardize clinical practice and improve patient outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><div>A systematic literature review including last 10 years was conducted using PubMed, Medline, and Google Scholar, focusing on PVT diagnosis and treatment. After applying exclusion criteria, 12 relevant articles were selected. Additionally, the WFNS Spine Committee convened two consensus meetings, employing the Delphi method. Spine experts participated in structured discussions and anonymous voting, with consensus defined as ≥66 % agreement. Core topics included classification, diagnostic modalities, and treatment strategies.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>PVT were categorized as benign or malignant, requiring distinct diagnostic and therapeutic approaches. MRI was recommended for tumor evaluation, while CT was preferred for assessing bony involvement. Biopsy was deemed essential for histopathological confirmation. Benign tumors were managed with curettage or en-bloc resection, with pharmacologic options for selected cases. Malignant PVT management included radiotherapy, chemotherapy for specific tumors, and en-bloc excision for resectable cases. Stereotactic body radiation therapy is suggested for unresectable tumors. The necessity of a multidisciplinary approach is emphasized.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Standardized classification, advanced imaging, and multidisciplinary approach are essentials for managing PVT. The WFNS Spine Committee’s recommendations provide a structured framework to guide diagnosis and treatment, improving decision-making and patient care.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":38138,"journal":{"name":"Interdisciplinary Neurosurgery: Advanced Techniques and Case Management","volume":"42 ","pages":"Article 102115"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interdisciplinary Neurosurgery: Advanced Techniques and Case Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214751925001276","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

Primary vertebral tumors (PVT) are rare neoplastic lesions distinct from metastatic spinal tumors. Due to their diverse nature and complex management, the World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies (WFNS) Spine Committee aimed to establish a consensus on the classification, diagnosis, and treatment of PVT to standardize clinical practice and improve patient outcomes.

Material and methods

A systematic literature review including last 10 years was conducted using PubMed, Medline, and Google Scholar, focusing on PVT diagnosis and treatment. After applying exclusion criteria, 12 relevant articles were selected. Additionally, the WFNS Spine Committee convened two consensus meetings, employing the Delphi method. Spine experts participated in structured discussions and anonymous voting, with consensus defined as ≥66 % agreement. Core topics included classification, diagnostic modalities, and treatment strategies.

Results

PVT were categorized as benign or malignant, requiring distinct diagnostic and therapeutic approaches. MRI was recommended for tumor evaluation, while CT was preferred for assessing bony involvement. Biopsy was deemed essential for histopathological confirmation. Benign tumors were managed with curettage or en-bloc resection, with pharmacologic options for selected cases. Malignant PVT management included radiotherapy, chemotherapy for specific tumors, and en-bloc excision for resectable cases. Stereotactic body radiation therapy is suggested for unresectable tumors. The necessity of a multidisciplinary approach is emphasized.

Conclusions

Standardized classification, advanced imaging, and multidisciplinary approach are essentials for managing PVT. The WFNS Spine Committee’s recommendations provide a structured framework to guide diagnosis and treatment, improving decision-making and patient care.
原发性椎体肿瘤的一般评估和决策:WFNS脊柱委员会的建议
目的原发性椎体肿瘤(PVT)是一种不同于脊柱转移性肿瘤的罕见肿瘤病变。由于PVT的多样性和复杂的管理,世界神经外科学会联合会(WFNS)脊柱委员会旨在就PVT的分类、诊断和治疗建立共识,以规范临床实践并改善患者预后。材料与方法通过PubMed、Medline、b谷歌Scholar等网站对近10年的文献进行系统回顾,重点对PVT的诊断与治疗进行研究。应用排除标准后,筛选出12篇相关文献。此外,WFNS脊柱委员会召开了两次共识会议,采用德尔菲法。脊柱专家参与了结构化讨论和匿名投票,共识定义为≥66%的同意。核心主题包括分类、诊断方式和治疗策略。结果spvt分为良性和恶性,需要明确的诊断和治疗方法。MRI推荐用于肿瘤评估,而CT优先用于评估骨受累情况。活检被认为是组织病理学确认的必要条件。良性肿瘤通过刮除或整体切除进行治疗,并对选定病例进行药物治疗。恶性PVT的治疗包括放疗、针对特定肿瘤的化疗和可切除病例的整体切除。对于不可切除的肿瘤,建议采用立体定向放射治疗。强调了多学科方法的必要性。结论:标准化分类、先进成像和多学科方法是治疗pvt的关键。WFNS脊柱委员会的建议提供了一个结构化的框架来指导诊断和治疗,改善决策和患者护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
236
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信