Mia Mae Kiamco, Eliza A. Sebastian, S.L. Rajasekhar Karna, Andrea B. Fourcaudot, Ping Chen, David T. Silliman, Joseph R. Wolf, Johnathan J. Abercrombie, Kai P. Leung
{"title":"Control of invasive Pseudomonas burn wound infection with mafenide acetate electrospun wound dressing","authors":"Mia Mae Kiamco, Eliza A. Sebastian, S.L. Rajasekhar Karna, Andrea B. Fourcaudot, Ping Chen, David T. Silliman, Joseph R. Wolf, Johnathan J. Abercrombie, Kai P. Leung","doi":"10.1016/j.burns.2025.107674","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Invasive wound infections are a leading cause of mortality in burn patients. <em>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</em> is among the most prevalent organisms associated with invasive burn wound infections. It is most effectively prevented by Sulfamylon® cream. The active compound, mafenide acetate, enters the wound rapidly and achieves the local concentration of 2- to 5- fold above the minimal inhibitory concentration for <em>P. aeruginosa</em> at 1–2 hrs. However, within 8–10 hrs, the mafenide acetate concentration rapidly declines to subinhibitory concentrations, and the treatment needs to be reapplied. In this study, we described the development of an electrospun burn wound dressing that could sustain the treatment effect by continuously releasing mafenide acetate at therapeutic concentrations into burn wounds for ≥ 24 hrs. We demonstrated by scanning electron microscopy that the mafenide acetate electrospun wound dressing consisted of smooth and uniform fibers. The extent and rate of mafenide acetate release from the dressing were determined <em>in vitro</em> using drug release and skin permeation tests and <em>in vivo</em> using a rat burn model. Finally, the mafenide acetate electrospun wound dressing’s antimicrobial activity <em>in vitro</em> and its capability to control invasive <em>Pseudomonas</em> infection <em>in vivo</em> was determined using a modified AATCC 100 test and the modified Walker-Mason scalded rat burn model, respectively.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50717,"journal":{"name":"Burns","volume":"51 9","pages":"Article 107674"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Burns","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305417925003031","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Invasive wound infections are a leading cause of mortality in burn patients. Pseudomonas aeruginosa is among the most prevalent organisms associated with invasive burn wound infections. It is most effectively prevented by Sulfamylon® cream. The active compound, mafenide acetate, enters the wound rapidly and achieves the local concentration of 2- to 5- fold above the minimal inhibitory concentration for P. aeruginosa at 1–2 hrs. However, within 8–10 hrs, the mafenide acetate concentration rapidly declines to subinhibitory concentrations, and the treatment needs to be reapplied. In this study, we described the development of an electrospun burn wound dressing that could sustain the treatment effect by continuously releasing mafenide acetate at therapeutic concentrations into burn wounds for ≥ 24 hrs. We demonstrated by scanning electron microscopy that the mafenide acetate electrospun wound dressing consisted of smooth and uniform fibers. The extent and rate of mafenide acetate release from the dressing were determined in vitro using drug release and skin permeation tests and in vivo using a rat burn model. Finally, the mafenide acetate electrospun wound dressing’s antimicrobial activity in vitro and its capability to control invasive Pseudomonas infection in vivo was determined using a modified AATCC 100 test and the modified Walker-Mason scalded rat burn model, respectively.
期刊介绍:
Burns aims to foster the exchange of information among all engaged in preventing and treating the effects of burns. The journal focuses on clinical, scientific and social aspects of these injuries and covers the prevention of the injury, the epidemiology of such injuries and all aspects of treatment including development of new techniques and technologies and verification of existing ones. Regular features include clinical and scientific papers, state of the art reviews and descriptions of burn-care in practice.
Topics covered by Burns include: the effects of smoke on man and animals, their tissues and cells; the responses to and treatment of patients and animals with chemical injuries to the skin; the biological and clinical effects of cold injuries; surgical techniques which are, or may be relevant to the treatment of burned patients during the acute or reconstructive phase following injury; well controlled laboratory studies of the effectiveness of anti-microbial agents on infection and new materials on scarring and healing; inflammatory responses to injury, effectiveness of related agents and other compounds used to modify the physiological and cellular responses to the injury; experimental studies of burns and the outcome of burn wound healing; regenerative medicine concerning the skin.