Program outcomes in a light-touch prosecutor-led misdemeanor diversion program

IF 2.5 1区 社会学 Q1 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
Alexa Cinque , Matthew Epperson , Rachel Garthe , Hannah Lee , Leon Sawh
{"title":"Program outcomes in a light-touch prosecutor-led misdemeanor diversion program","authors":"Alexa Cinque ,&nbsp;Matthew Epperson ,&nbsp;Rachel Garthe ,&nbsp;Hannah Lee ,&nbsp;Leon Sawh","doi":"10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2025.102498","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>While misdemeanors are generally classified as less serious than felonies, misdemeanor convictions still carry significant collateral consequences. Prior scholarship has also documented the racial, economic, and spatial disparities inherent to misdemeanor enforcement. In recent years, prosecutors have pursued diversion programming as a strategy to reduce the negative harms of conviction and incarceration for individuals and communities. This study examines the program outcomes for a prosecutor-led misdemeanor diversion program (MDP) in a large, midwestern county and whether MDP completion is associated with reduced recidivism. Administrative data from 4,167 individuals enrolled in MDP between August 2012 and August 2018 were analyzed. Data on arrests and sentencing were obtained from a state criminal justice agency and matched with MDP records. Multivariate logistic regression was used to assess post-program arrest and incarceration outcomes, including a subsample with three or more years of post-program data. Most participants completed MDP (86.2 %), leading to dismissal of charges. Completion was significantly associated with reduced odds of subsequent arrest (aOR = 0.27) and conviction (aOR = 0.25). Among those with at least three years of follow-up, MDP completion remained significantly associated with reduced arrests (aOR = 0.23) and incarceration (aOR = 0.28). This study also considers the benefits of implementing a light-touch, short-term diversion program for misdemeanors within the broader context of policing practices, racial disparities, and implications for public safety. Overall, MDP completion is associated with reductions in recidivism, suggesting that light-touch diversion programs may be one strategy for disrupting cycles of involvement in the criminal legal system.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48272,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Criminal Justice","volume":"101 ","pages":"Article 102498"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Criminal Justice","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0047235225001473","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

While misdemeanors are generally classified as less serious than felonies, misdemeanor convictions still carry significant collateral consequences. Prior scholarship has also documented the racial, economic, and spatial disparities inherent to misdemeanor enforcement. In recent years, prosecutors have pursued diversion programming as a strategy to reduce the negative harms of conviction and incarceration for individuals and communities. This study examines the program outcomes for a prosecutor-led misdemeanor diversion program (MDP) in a large, midwestern county and whether MDP completion is associated with reduced recidivism. Administrative data from 4,167 individuals enrolled in MDP between August 2012 and August 2018 were analyzed. Data on arrests and sentencing were obtained from a state criminal justice agency and matched with MDP records. Multivariate logistic regression was used to assess post-program arrest and incarceration outcomes, including a subsample with three or more years of post-program data. Most participants completed MDP (86.2 %), leading to dismissal of charges. Completion was significantly associated with reduced odds of subsequent arrest (aOR = 0.27) and conviction (aOR = 0.25). Among those with at least three years of follow-up, MDP completion remained significantly associated with reduced arrests (aOR = 0.23) and incarceration (aOR = 0.28). This study also considers the benefits of implementing a light-touch, short-term diversion program for misdemeanors within the broader context of policing practices, racial disparities, and implications for public safety. Overall, MDP completion is associated with reductions in recidivism, suggesting that light-touch diversion programs may be one strategy for disrupting cycles of involvement in the criminal legal system.
项目结果是由检察官主导的轻罪转移项目
虽然轻罪通常被归类为没有重罪严重,但轻罪定罪仍然会带来严重的附带后果。先前的学术研究也记录了在轻罪执法中固有的种族、经济和空间差异。近年来,检察官一直在推行转移计划,作为一种策略,以减少定罪和监禁对个人和社区的负面伤害。本研究考察了中西部一个大县由检察官主导的轻罪转移项目(MDP)的项目结果,以及MDP的完成是否与减少再犯有关。分析了2012年8月至2018年8月期间参加MDP的4167人的管理数据。逮捕和量刑的数据是从国家刑事司法机构获得的,并与民主党的记录相匹配。多变量逻辑回归用于评估项目后的逮捕和监禁结果,包括项目后三年或更长时间数据的子样本。大多数参与者完成了MDP(86.2%),导致了指控的撤销。完成治疗与随后被捕(aOR = 0.27)和定罪(aOR = 0.25)的几率降低显著相关。在随访至少3年的患者中,完成MDP仍与减少逮捕(aOR = 0.23)和监禁(aOR = 0.28)显著相关。本研究还考虑了在更广泛的警务实践、种族差异和公共安全影响的背景下,对轻罪实施轻触式短期转移计划的好处。总体而言,MDP的完成与再犯的减少有关,这表明轻触式转移计划可能是破坏刑事法律系统中参与循环的一种策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Criminal Justice
Journal of Criminal Justice CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY-
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
9.10%
发文量
93
审稿时长
23 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Criminal Justice is an international journal intended to fill the present need for the dissemination of new information, ideas and methods, to both practitioners and academicians in the criminal justice area. The Journal is concerned with all aspects of the criminal justice system in terms of their relationships to each other. Although materials are presented relating to crime and the individual elements of the criminal justice system, the emphasis of the Journal is to tie together the functioning of these elements and to illustrate the effects of their interactions. Articles that reflect the application of new disciplines or analytical methodologies to the problems of criminal justice are of special interest. Since the purpose of the Journal is to provide a forum for the dissemination of new ideas, new information, and the application of new methods to the problems and functions of the criminal justice system, the Journal emphasizes innovation and creative thought of the highest quality.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信