Inclusive education from an ethical and connection perspective: The implementation of school integration programs in Chilean rural schools

IF 2.5 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Carmen Gloria Núñez , Bárbara Orrego , Mónica Peña , Andrea Precht , Gabriel Ruete , Bryan González-Niculcar
{"title":"Inclusive education from an ethical and connection perspective: The implementation of school integration programs in Chilean rural schools","authors":"Carmen Gloria Núñez ,&nbsp;Bárbara Orrego ,&nbsp;Mónica Peña ,&nbsp;Andrea Precht ,&nbsp;Gabriel Ruete ,&nbsp;Bryan González-Niculcar","doi":"10.1016/j.ijer.2025.102776","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Educational inclusion policies in Chile have sought to expand equitable access to schooling, with significant implications for rural education. Rural schools increasingly enroll students excluded from urban schools, many with special educational needs and irregular trajectories. While the School Integration Program (PIE by the Spanish acronym) was designed to address such diversity, its implementation in rural contexts presents multiple challenges. This study examines how rural schools mediate the inclusion of urban students through institutional practices. A multiple-case study was conducted in five rural schools across three macro-regions of Chile, using interviews, participant observation, and intra- and cross-case analysis. Findings reveal that, at the policy level, schools must comply with diagnostic-based regulations and quota systems that overlook rural specificities, leading to overcrowding, professional turnover, and infrastructural limitations. Culturally, rural schools construct an ethic of care that emphasizes student relationships, trajectories, and territorial ties, forming a distinctive dimension of institutional mediation. At the practical level, tensions arise between biomedical approaches, which label students, and pedagogical logics that promote inclusion without stigmatization. The study concludes that rural schools implement the PIE through situated institutional mediation, integrating ethical principles, organizational decisions, and pedagogical relationships to navigate the complexities of inclusive education.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48076,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Educational Research","volume":"134 ","pages":"Article 102776"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Educational Research","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0883035525002496","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Educational inclusion policies in Chile have sought to expand equitable access to schooling, with significant implications for rural education. Rural schools increasingly enroll students excluded from urban schools, many with special educational needs and irregular trajectories. While the School Integration Program (PIE by the Spanish acronym) was designed to address such diversity, its implementation in rural contexts presents multiple challenges. This study examines how rural schools mediate the inclusion of urban students through institutional practices. A multiple-case study was conducted in five rural schools across three macro-regions of Chile, using interviews, participant observation, and intra- and cross-case analysis. Findings reveal that, at the policy level, schools must comply with diagnostic-based regulations and quota systems that overlook rural specificities, leading to overcrowding, professional turnover, and infrastructural limitations. Culturally, rural schools construct an ethic of care that emphasizes student relationships, trajectories, and territorial ties, forming a distinctive dimension of institutional mediation. At the practical level, tensions arise between biomedical approaches, which label students, and pedagogical logics that promote inclusion without stigmatization. The study concludes that rural schools implement the PIE through situated institutional mediation, integrating ethical principles, organizational decisions, and pedagogical relationships to navigate the complexities of inclusive education.
伦理与联系视角下的全纳教育:智利农村学校整合计划的实施
智利的教育包容政策力求扩大公平入学机会,这对农村教育具有重大影响。越来越多的农村学校招收被城市学校排除在外的学生,其中许多人有特殊的教育需求,生活轨迹不规则。虽然学校融合方案(PIE,西班牙语首字母缩写)旨在解决这种多样性问题,但在农村环境中实施该方案面临多重挑战。本研究考察了农村学校如何通过制度实践来调解城市学生的融入。本研究在智利三个宏观区域的五所农村学校开展了多案例研究,采用访谈、参与者观察、内部和跨案例分析等方法。调查结果显示,在政策层面,学校必须遵守基于诊断的法规和配额制度,而这些法规和配额制度忽视了农村的特殊性,导致过度拥挤、专业人员流失和基础设施限制。在文化上,农村学校构建了一种强调学生关系、轨迹和地域联系的关怀伦理,形成了一种独特的制度调解维度。在实践层面,给学生贴上标签的生物医学方法与促进包容而不污名化的教学逻辑之间出现了紧张关系。该研究的结论是,农村学校通过适当的制度调解、整合伦理原则、组织决策和教学关系来实施包容性教育,以应对包容性教育的复杂性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Educational Research
International Journal of Educational Research EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
3.10%
发文量
141
审稿时长
21 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Educational Research publishes regular papers and special issues on specific topics of interest to international audiences of educational researchers. Examples of recent Special Issues published in the journal illustrate the breadth of topics that have be included in the journal: Students Perspectives on Learning Environments, Social, Motivational and Emotional Aspects of Learning Disabilities, Epistemological Beliefs and Domain, Analyzing Mathematics Classroom Cultures and Practices, and Music Education: A site for collaborative creativity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信