Jianxin Lin , Yan Kang , Qingxi Liao , Wenbin Du , Lin Li , Qingsong Zhang
{"title":"Numerical analysis and parameter optimization of soil-loosening plow compatible with the shovel-type seedbed preparation machine","authors":"Jianxin Lin , Yan Kang , Qingxi Liao , Wenbin Du , Lin Li , Qingsong Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.compag.2025.110981","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The soil-loosening plow (SLP) was mounted in front of the shovel-type seedbed preparation machine (SSPM) to form a combined tillage machine (CTM), which is used for rapeseed seedbed preparation in rice-rapeseed rotation regions. A discrete element method-multibody dynamics (DEM-MBD) simulation model was developed in this manuscript, and the model’s accuracy was validated by comparing the power take-off torque (PT), draft force (DF), and clod crushing rate (CCR) of the SSPM during the simulation and experiment processes. Based on the validated model, the CTM was used as the simulation test implement. Tillage depth, wing installation height, and wing installation angle of the SLP were chosen as simulation factors. Simulation tests were conducted using the CCR and power consumption as evaluation indices. Single-factor experiment results showed that the DF power and total power consumption of the CTM increased progressively with greater tillage depth of the SLP, whereas the PT power consumption exhibited an opposite trend. As the wing installation height increased, the DF power consumption of CTM decreased, while the PT power consumption increased. With increasing wing installation angle, the DF power consumption of CTM first decreased and then increased. With the objective function of minimizing PT power consumption and total power consumption, the optimal parameters were determined to be a tillage depth of 160 mm, a wing installation height of 22 mm, and a wing installation angle of 5°. A comparative simulation was then performed between the CTM configured with these optimal parameters and the SSPM without installing the SLP. The simulation results indicated that, in comparison with the SSPM, the CTM increased the number of broken soil bonds by 10.50 %, the average tillage resistance on shovel and PT were reduced by 35.26 % and 31.06 %, respectively. These results indicated that the optimized SLP effectively lowered the PT requirement and tillage resistance on shovel during CTM operation. The experiments conducted on fields following rice harvest confirmed these simulation results. After CTM operation, the tillage depth stability coefficient, straw burial rate, and CCR reached 82.39 %, 86.69 %, and 83.54 %, respectively—improvements of 13.78 %, 10.17 %, and 7.89 % over the SSPM.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50627,"journal":{"name":"Computers and Electronics in Agriculture","volume":"239 ","pages":"Article 110981"},"PeriodicalIF":8.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers and Electronics in Agriculture","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168169925010877","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The soil-loosening plow (SLP) was mounted in front of the shovel-type seedbed preparation machine (SSPM) to form a combined tillage machine (CTM), which is used for rapeseed seedbed preparation in rice-rapeseed rotation regions. A discrete element method-multibody dynamics (DEM-MBD) simulation model was developed in this manuscript, and the model’s accuracy was validated by comparing the power take-off torque (PT), draft force (DF), and clod crushing rate (CCR) of the SSPM during the simulation and experiment processes. Based on the validated model, the CTM was used as the simulation test implement. Tillage depth, wing installation height, and wing installation angle of the SLP were chosen as simulation factors. Simulation tests were conducted using the CCR and power consumption as evaluation indices. Single-factor experiment results showed that the DF power and total power consumption of the CTM increased progressively with greater tillage depth of the SLP, whereas the PT power consumption exhibited an opposite trend. As the wing installation height increased, the DF power consumption of CTM decreased, while the PT power consumption increased. With increasing wing installation angle, the DF power consumption of CTM first decreased and then increased. With the objective function of minimizing PT power consumption and total power consumption, the optimal parameters were determined to be a tillage depth of 160 mm, a wing installation height of 22 mm, and a wing installation angle of 5°. A comparative simulation was then performed between the CTM configured with these optimal parameters and the SSPM without installing the SLP. The simulation results indicated that, in comparison with the SSPM, the CTM increased the number of broken soil bonds by 10.50 %, the average tillage resistance on shovel and PT were reduced by 35.26 % and 31.06 %, respectively. These results indicated that the optimized SLP effectively lowered the PT requirement and tillage resistance on shovel during CTM operation. The experiments conducted on fields following rice harvest confirmed these simulation results. After CTM operation, the tillage depth stability coefficient, straw burial rate, and CCR reached 82.39 %, 86.69 %, and 83.54 %, respectively—improvements of 13.78 %, 10.17 %, and 7.89 % over the SSPM.
期刊介绍:
Computers and Electronics in Agriculture provides international coverage of advancements in computer hardware, software, electronic instrumentation, and control systems applied to agricultural challenges. Encompassing agronomy, horticulture, forestry, aquaculture, and animal farming, the journal publishes original papers, reviews, and applications notes. It explores the use of computers and electronics in plant or animal agricultural production, covering topics like agricultural soils, water, pests, controlled environments, and waste. The scope extends to on-farm post-harvest operations and relevant technologies, including artificial intelligence, sensors, machine vision, robotics, networking, and simulation modeling. Its companion journal, Smart Agricultural Technology, continues the focus on smart applications in production agriculture.