{"title":"Advancing justice in marine biodiversity conservation","authors":"Chris Armstrong","doi":"10.1016/j.marpol.2025.106906","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Drawing on contemporary political theory, this paper sets out several key normative standards that can be applied to the conservation of marine biodiversity. Such standards ensure that progress in mitigating the biodiversity crisis is achieved fairly and inclusively. The paper suggests that the costs of heading off the marine biodiversity crisis must be allocated in line with contribution to the problem, and ability to pay, and that there can be no justification for leaving the most disadvantaged to bear significant conservation costs. It also clarifies what kinds of activities can count as biodiversity conservation policies, in order to keep the environmental consequences of unsustainable consumption in the global North firmly in view. Finally, it argues that decision-making about marine biodiversity should be opened up much more widely, at all stages of the policy-making process, to ensure that all of those affected by conservation policies have a fair chance to be involved in formulating policies and priorities.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48427,"journal":{"name":"Marine Policy","volume":"183 ","pages":"Article 106906"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Marine Policy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308597X25003227","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Drawing on contemporary political theory, this paper sets out several key normative standards that can be applied to the conservation of marine biodiversity. Such standards ensure that progress in mitigating the biodiversity crisis is achieved fairly and inclusively. The paper suggests that the costs of heading off the marine biodiversity crisis must be allocated in line with contribution to the problem, and ability to pay, and that there can be no justification for leaving the most disadvantaged to bear significant conservation costs. It also clarifies what kinds of activities can count as biodiversity conservation policies, in order to keep the environmental consequences of unsustainable consumption in the global North firmly in view. Finally, it argues that decision-making about marine biodiversity should be opened up much more widely, at all stages of the policy-making process, to ensure that all of those affected by conservation policies have a fair chance to be involved in formulating policies and priorities.
期刊介绍:
Marine Policy is the leading journal of ocean policy studies. It offers researchers, analysts and policy makers a unique combination of analyses in the principal social science disciplines relevant to the formulation of marine policy. Major articles are contributed by specialists in marine affairs, including marine economists and marine resource managers, political scientists, marine scientists, international lawyers, geographers and anthropologists. Drawing on their expertise and research, the journal covers: international, regional and national marine policies; institutional arrangements for the management and regulation of marine activities, including fisheries and shipping; conflict resolution; marine pollution and environment; conservation and use of marine resources. Regular features of Marine Policy include research reports, conference reports and reports on current developments to keep readers up-to-date with the latest developments and research in ocean affairs.