Analyzing engagement in virtual teams: A cross-cultural study on videoconference and virtual reality

IF 5.8 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Pedro Barreiras, Manuela Aparicio, Jorge Rodrigues, Yanrong Yang
{"title":"Analyzing engagement in virtual teams: A cross-cultural study on videoconference and virtual reality","authors":"Pedro Barreiras,&nbsp;Manuela Aparicio,&nbsp;Jorge Rodrigues,&nbsp;Yanrong Yang","doi":"10.1016/j.chbr.2025.100803","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper investigates the transition from videoconferencing (VC) to virtual reality (VR) collaborative meetings by comparing user perceptions in regions with low – United Kingdom (UK) and United States of America (USA) - and high – Portugal (PT) – uncertainty avoidance (UA) levels. Based on an experimental design approach, a questionnaire was distributed to respondents from one of two groups, depending on the type of platform (TP) – VC or VR. For the low UA region, Study 1.1 explores the impact of the type of platform on work engagement (WE) as well as the mediation of creative behavior (CB), impression of interaction possibilities (IIP), and perceived enjoyment (PE). Because no significant difference in WE levels between VR and VC was found, as a possible explanation for this result, we further examined and confirmed a significant moderation of resistance to change (RTC) in Study 1.2. From the findings of Study 1 emerged the possibility that these unfavorable feelings about the technological shift could be a more generalized phenomenon than previously expected (in low and high UA regions). Focusing on Portugal, Study 2 presented similar findings to the ones of Study 1: no significant WE difference between VR and VC was found and RTC's moderation was supported. Overall, despite the advantages of the technology, transitioning from VC to VR collaborative meetings may pose a higher challenge than previously expected. The findings of this paper initiate a critical discussion on the potential global barriers to the implementation of VR collaborative meetings.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72681,"journal":{"name":"Computers in human behavior reports","volume":"20 ","pages":"Article 100803"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers in human behavior reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2451958825002180","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper investigates the transition from videoconferencing (VC) to virtual reality (VR) collaborative meetings by comparing user perceptions in regions with low – United Kingdom (UK) and United States of America (USA) - and high – Portugal (PT) – uncertainty avoidance (UA) levels. Based on an experimental design approach, a questionnaire was distributed to respondents from one of two groups, depending on the type of platform (TP) – VC or VR. For the low UA region, Study 1.1 explores the impact of the type of platform on work engagement (WE) as well as the mediation of creative behavior (CB), impression of interaction possibilities (IIP), and perceived enjoyment (PE). Because no significant difference in WE levels between VR and VC was found, as a possible explanation for this result, we further examined and confirmed a significant moderation of resistance to change (RTC) in Study 1.2. From the findings of Study 1 emerged the possibility that these unfavorable feelings about the technological shift could be a more generalized phenomenon than previously expected (in low and high UA regions). Focusing on Portugal, Study 2 presented similar findings to the ones of Study 1: no significant WE difference between VR and VC was found and RTC's moderation was supported. Overall, despite the advantages of the technology, transitioning from VC to VR collaborative meetings may pose a higher challenge than previously expected. The findings of this paper initiate a critical discussion on the potential global barriers to the implementation of VR collaborative meetings.
虚拟团队的敬业度分析:视频会议与虚拟现实的跨文化研究
本文通过比较英国(UK)和美国(USA)等低不确定性规避(UA)水平和葡萄牙(PT)等高不确定性规避(UA)水平地区的用户感知,研究了从视频会议(VC)到虚拟现实(VR)协作会议的转变。根据实验设计方法,根据平台(TP)的类型(VC或VR),将调查问卷分发给两组中的一组。对于低UA区域,研究1.1探讨了平台类型对工作投入(WE)的影响,以及创造性行为(CB)、互动可能性印象(IIP)和感知享受(PE)的中介作用。由于在VR和VC之间没有发现显著的WE水平差异,作为对这一结果的可能解释,我们在研究1.2中进一步检查并证实了抵抗变化(RTC)的显著调节。从研究1的发现来看,这些对技术转变的负面情绪可能比之前预期的更为普遍(在低UA和高UA地区)。以葡萄牙为研究对象,研究2得出了与研究1相似的结果:VR和VC之间没有显著的WE差异,支持RTC的适度性。总体而言,尽管该技术具有优势,但从风险投资向虚拟现实协作会议的过渡可能会带来比之前预期更高的挑战。本文的研究结果引发了对实施虚拟现实协作会议的潜在全球障碍的批判性讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信