Optimizing pricing in an online marketplace: The role of buy-now, pay-later option and return policies

IF 13.1 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Somayeh Najafi-Ghobadi , Mina Rezaei Kalantary
{"title":"Optimizing pricing in an online marketplace: The role of buy-now, pay-later option and return policies","authors":"Somayeh Najafi-Ghobadi ,&nbsp;Mina Rezaei Kalantary","doi":"10.1016/j.jretconser.2025.104493","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper examines the integration of Buy Now, Pay Later (BNPL) services with return policies (refund and exchange) in a supply chain comprising an online marketplace and a retailer. Using a Stackelberg game framework—where the marketplace acts as the leader and the retailer as the follower—we analyze two models: refund/exchange return policies; each of which is formulated with and without BNPL. The models incorporate platform fees and the percentage charged by the marketplace for BNPL as well as prices for the online retailer. Findings reveal that marketplaces should set higher platform fees on the retailer offering refund return policy to offset profit losses from cancellations, as penalties under cancellations are lower than standard fees. Moreover, the exchange return policy aligns better with BNPL, enabling the retailer to set higher prices while minimizing cancellations. Refunds, however, are more viable without BNPL due to inherent cancellation risks. Equilibrium solutions demonstrate that the marketplace's BNPL percentage parameter positively impacts their related prices and the rate of return positively influences Ex-RP driven prices. The analysis underscores that no return policy dominates universally; optimal strategies depend on parameters like cancellation penalty, product supplement during Out-Of-Stock situations fees, and return policies. Moreover, the number of installments acts separately from the BNPL percentage. For the online marketplace, as the owner of the platform, the former leads Ex-RP to become superior while the latter, in most cases, results in the opposite way. This study provides actionable insights for platforms and retailers to balance BNPL offerings with return policy structures.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48399,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services","volume":"88 ","pages":"Article 104493"},"PeriodicalIF":13.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0969698925002723","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper examines the integration of Buy Now, Pay Later (BNPL) services with return policies (refund and exchange) in a supply chain comprising an online marketplace and a retailer. Using a Stackelberg game framework—where the marketplace acts as the leader and the retailer as the follower—we analyze two models: refund/exchange return policies; each of which is formulated with and without BNPL. The models incorporate platform fees and the percentage charged by the marketplace for BNPL as well as prices for the online retailer. Findings reveal that marketplaces should set higher platform fees on the retailer offering refund return policy to offset profit losses from cancellations, as penalties under cancellations are lower than standard fees. Moreover, the exchange return policy aligns better with BNPL, enabling the retailer to set higher prices while minimizing cancellations. Refunds, however, are more viable without BNPL due to inherent cancellation risks. Equilibrium solutions demonstrate that the marketplace's BNPL percentage parameter positively impacts their related prices and the rate of return positively influences Ex-RP driven prices. The analysis underscores that no return policy dominates universally; optimal strategies depend on parameters like cancellation penalty, product supplement during Out-Of-Stock situations fees, and return policies. Moreover, the number of installments acts separately from the BNPL percentage. For the online marketplace, as the owner of the platform, the former leads Ex-RP to become superior while the latter, in most cases, results in the opposite way. This study provides actionable insights for platforms and retailers to balance BNPL offerings with return policy structures.
优化在线市场的定价:先买后付的选择和退货政策的作用
本文研究了在一个由在线市场和零售商组成的供应链中,先买后付(BNPL)服务与退货政策(退款和换货)的集成。使用Stackelberg游戏框架(游戏邦注:即市场充当领导者,零售商充当跟随者),我们分析了两种模式:退款/交换退货政策;每一种都是用或不含BNPL配制的。这些模式包括平台费用和市场向BNPL收取的百分比,以及在线零售商的价格。调查结果显示,市场应该对提供退款退货政策的零售商设定更高的平台费用,以抵消取消订单带来的利润损失,因为取消订单的罚款低于标准费用。此外,交换退货政策与BNPL更一致,使零售商能够设定更高的价格,同时最大限度地减少取消。然而,由于固有的取消风险,没有BNPL退款更可行。均衡解表明,市场的BNPL百分比参数正影响其相关价格,收益率正影响前rp驱动的价格。分析强调,不退货政策普遍占主导地位;最优策略取决于取消罚款、缺货期间的产品补充费用和退货政策等参数。此外,分期付款的数量与BNPL百分比是分开的。对于在线市场来说,作为平台的所有者,前者会导致Ex-RP变得优越,而后者在大多数情况下会导致相反的结果。本研究为平台和零售商平衡BNPL产品与退货政策结构提供了可行的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
20.40
自引率
14.40%
发文量
340
审稿时长
20 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services is a prominent publication that serves as a platform for international and interdisciplinary research and discussions in the constantly evolving fields of retailing and services studies. With a specific emphasis on consumer behavior and policy and managerial decisions, the journal aims to foster contributions from academics encompassing diverse disciplines. The primary areas covered by the journal are: Retailing and the sale of goods The provision of consumer services, including transportation, tourism, and leisure.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信