Carbon footprint reduction potential of consumption changes in five European countries in 2015, 2030, and 2050

IF 9.6 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Stephanie Cap , Sinja Li , Arjan de Koning , Antti Karjalainen , Michael Lettenmeier , Luca Coscieme , Arnold Tukker , Laura Scherer
{"title":"Carbon footprint reduction potential of consumption changes in five European countries in 2015, 2030, and 2050","authors":"Stephanie Cap ,&nbsp;Sinja Li ,&nbsp;Arjan de Koning ,&nbsp;Antti Karjalainen ,&nbsp;Michael Lettenmeier ,&nbsp;Luca Coscieme ,&nbsp;Arnold Tukker ,&nbsp;Laura Scherer","doi":"10.1016/j.spc.2025.08.018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Limiting global warming to 1.5°C requires extensive socioeconomic and technological transformations. With approximately two-thirds of global greenhouse gas emissions linked to household consumption, reducing demand-side emissions through low-carbon lifestyle changes is critical. While major emissions hotspots and high-impact consumption changes are known, a cross-country prospective analysis of their emissions reduction potential has been missing. This study quantifies the avoided greenhouse gas emissions from 47 consumption changes across five diverse European countries. We assess how socioeconomic and technological changes influence emissions reduction potentials by comparing such potentials in a baseline year (2015) with those in 2030 and 2050 under a sustainable development scenario. Our findings highlight that the most effective mitigation options involve reducing conventional vehicle use, decarbonizing household heating, and shifting to predominantly plant-based diets. Though country-specific variation exists, we observed that the emissions reduction potentials of many consumption changes evolve proportionally to technological changes. Behaviors involving direct fossil fuel combustion, such as car travel or fossil-fueled heating, remain largely unabated by technological shifts without lifestyle change, thus increasing in relative mitigation potential. Changes relying on electricity substitution, such as switching to a heat pump, were most dependent on systemic decarbonization. These insights demonstrate which household-level actions consistently offer high emissions mitigation potential and which are more sensitive to broader system changes. Our results provide a clearer understanding of how individual climate change mitigation actions intersect with long-term industrial decarbonization strategies, supporting more targeted policymaking for demand-side climate change mitigation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48619,"journal":{"name":"Sustainable Production and Consumption","volume":"59 ","pages":"Pages 408-421"},"PeriodicalIF":9.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sustainable Production and Consumption","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352550925001745","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Limiting global warming to 1.5°C requires extensive socioeconomic and technological transformations. With approximately two-thirds of global greenhouse gas emissions linked to household consumption, reducing demand-side emissions through low-carbon lifestyle changes is critical. While major emissions hotspots and high-impact consumption changes are known, a cross-country prospective analysis of their emissions reduction potential has been missing. This study quantifies the avoided greenhouse gas emissions from 47 consumption changes across five diverse European countries. We assess how socioeconomic and technological changes influence emissions reduction potentials by comparing such potentials in a baseline year (2015) with those in 2030 and 2050 under a sustainable development scenario. Our findings highlight that the most effective mitigation options involve reducing conventional vehicle use, decarbonizing household heating, and shifting to predominantly plant-based diets. Though country-specific variation exists, we observed that the emissions reduction potentials of many consumption changes evolve proportionally to technological changes. Behaviors involving direct fossil fuel combustion, such as car travel or fossil-fueled heating, remain largely unabated by technological shifts without lifestyle change, thus increasing in relative mitigation potential. Changes relying on electricity substitution, such as switching to a heat pump, were most dependent on systemic decarbonization. These insights demonstrate which household-level actions consistently offer high emissions mitigation potential and which are more sensitive to broader system changes. Our results provide a clearer understanding of how individual climate change mitigation actions intersect with long-term industrial decarbonization strategies, supporting more targeted policymaking for demand-side climate change mitigation.
2015年、2030年和2050年欧洲五国消费变化的碳足迹减少潜力
将全球变暖限制在1.5°C需要广泛的社会经济和技术变革。由于全球约三分之二的温室气体排放与家庭消费有关,因此通过改变低碳生活方式来减少需求侧排放至关重要。虽然已知主要的排放热点和高影响的消费变化,但缺乏对其减排潜力的跨国前瞻性分析。这项研究量化了五个不同欧洲国家47项消费变化所避免的温室气体排放。通过将基准年(2015年)的减排潜力与可持续发展情景下2030年和2050年的减排潜力进行比较,我们评估了社会经济和技术变化如何影响减排潜力。我们的研究结果强调,最有效的缓解方案包括减少传统车辆的使用,使家庭供暖脱碳,以及转向以植物为主的饮食。尽管存在国别差异,但我们观察到,许多消费变化的减排潜力与技术变化成正比。涉及直接燃烧化石燃料的行为,如汽车旅行或化石燃料加热,在没有改变生活方式的情况下,在很大程度上仍未因技术变化而减少,因此相对缓解潜力增加。依靠电力替代的变化,如改用热泵,最依赖于系统脱碳。这些见解表明,哪些家庭一级的行动始终具有较高的减排潜力,哪些对更广泛的系统变化更敏感。我们的研究结果更清楚地了解了个体气候变化减缓行动与长期工业脱碳战略之间的相互作用,为更有针对性的需求侧气候变化减缓政策制定提供了支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Sustainable Production and Consumption
Sustainable Production and Consumption Environmental Science-Environmental Engineering
CiteScore
17.40
自引率
7.40%
发文量
389
审稿时长
13 days
期刊介绍: Sustainable production and consumption refers to the production and utilization of goods and services in a way that benefits society, is economically viable, and has minimal environmental impact throughout its entire lifespan. Our journal is dedicated to publishing top-notch interdisciplinary research and practical studies in this emerging field. We take a distinctive approach by examining the interplay between technology, consumption patterns, and policy to identify sustainable solutions for both production and consumption systems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信