Modeling soil organic carbon dynamics and uncertainty in life cycle assessment of agricultural systems

IF 9.6 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Awais Mahmood , Hafiz Usman Ghani , Ilkka Leinonen , Shabbir H. Gheewala
{"title":"Modeling soil organic carbon dynamics and uncertainty in life cycle assessment of agricultural systems","authors":"Awais Mahmood ,&nbsp;Hafiz Usman Ghani ,&nbsp;Ilkka Leinonen ,&nbsp;Shabbir H. Gheewala","doi":"10.1016/j.spc.2025.09.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>ISO 14067:2018 mandates accounting for land use and land use change (LULUC) impacts on global warming impact due to carbon stock changes in living biomass, litter, dead organic matter, and soil organic carbon (SOC). Furthermore, the SOC changes are particularly relevant for cropland-based products. Despite methodological advancements, there is still no universally agreed-upon approach on how to evaluate LULUC-related global warming impact within Life Cycle Assessment (LCA), highlighting the need for a standardized approach. This study presents a comprehensive method for assessing SOC dynamics due to land use in LCA, incorporating uncertainties associated with model-based estimations. Using the Tier-2 IPCC Steady State Soil Carbon model, the study analyzed SOC changes in sugarcane cultivation on mineral soils in Thailand. The study examined the effects of land use history across different study periods (T-20, T-50, and T-100 years), as well as the impact of land management practices (full-, reduced-, and no-tillage) and residue management strategies (100 % burnt, 100 % retained, and mixed) on SOC change. While the model study period considerably influenced the initial SOC stocks, the variations in soil organic carbon stock change due to study periods, land management, and residue management practices were statistically not significant. However, the model-associated uncertainties were found to be substantial. The distribution fit assessment revealed that CO<sub>2</sub> emission/removal related flow follows a normal distribution [X ~ N (μ, σ<sup>2</sup>)]. Our findings highlighted the importance of incorporating ∆SOC into carbon footprint calculations to accurately capture the carbon sequestration potential of soils, which can significantly offset emissions. Neglecting SOC dynamics may lead to an overestimation of CO<sub>2</sub> emissions and an incomplete assessment of net carbon impact. Therefore, given the significant variations observed in global warming impact, integrating SOC considerations into LCAs is essential for improving the precision of environmental evaluations of agriculture-based products.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48619,"journal":{"name":"Sustainable Production and Consumption","volume":"59 ","pages":"Pages 393-407"},"PeriodicalIF":9.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sustainable Production and Consumption","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352550925001794","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ISO 14067:2018 mandates accounting for land use and land use change (LULUC) impacts on global warming impact due to carbon stock changes in living biomass, litter, dead organic matter, and soil organic carbon (SOC). Furthermore, the SOC changes are particularly relevant for cropland-based products. Despite methodological advancements, there is still no universally agreed-upon approach on how to evaluate LULUC-related global warming impact within Life Cycle Assessment (LCA), highlighting the need for a standardized approach. This study presents a comprehensive method for assessing SOC dynamics due to land use in LCA, incorporating uncertainties associated with model-based estimations. Using the Tier-2 IPCC Steady State Soil Carbon model, the study analyzed SOC changes in sugarcane cultivation on mineral soils in Thailand. The study examined the effects of land use history across different study periods (T-20, T-50, and T-100 years), as well as the impact of land management practices (full-, reduced-, and no-tillage) and residue management strategies (100 % burnt, 100 % retained, and mixed) on SOC change. While the model study period considerably influenced the initial SOC stocks, the variations in soil organic carbon stock change due to study periods, land management, and residue management practices were statistically not significant. However, the model-associated uncertainties were found to be substantial. The distribution fit assessment revealed that CO2 emission/removal related flow follows a normal distribution [X ~ N (μ, σ2)]. Our findings highlighted the importance of incorporating ∆SOC into carbon footprint calculations to accurately capture the carbon sequestration potential of soils, which can significantly offset emissions. Neglecting SOC dynamics may lead to an overestimation of CO2 emissions and an incomplete assessment of net carbon impact. Therefore, given the significant variations observed in global warming impact, integrating SOC considerations into LCAs is essential for improving the precision of environmental evaluations of agriculture-based products.
农业系统生命周期评估中土壤有机碳动态与不确定性建模
ISO 14067:2018要求考虑土地利用和土地利用变化(LULUC)对全球变暖影响的影响,这是由于活生物量、凋落物、死有机质和土壤有机碳(SOC)的碳储量变化。此外,SOC变化与基于农田的产品特别相关。尽管方法上取得了进步,但对于如何在生命周期评估(LCA)中评估luluc相关的全球变暖影响,仍然没有普遍认可的方法,这突出了标准化方法的必要性。本研究提出了一种综合评估LCA土地利用引起的有机碳动态的方法,包括与基于模型的估算相关的不确定性。采用Tier-2 IPCC稳态土壤碳模型,分析了泰国矿质土壤中甘蔗种植过程中有机碳的变化。该研究考察了不同研究时期(T-20、T-50和T-100年)土地利用历史的影响,以及土地管理实践(全面、减少和免耕)和残留物管理策略(100%燃烧、100%保留和混合)对土壤有机碳变化的影响。模型研究时段对土壤有机碳储量的影响较大,但不同研究时段、土地管理方式和秸秆管理方式对土壤有机碳储量的影响不显著。然而,发现与模式相关的不确定性是相当大的。分布拟合评价表明,CO2排放/去除相关流量服从正态分布[X ~ N (μ, σ2)]。我们的研究结果强调了将∆SOC纳入碳足迹计算的重要性,以准确捕获土壤的碳固存潜力,这可以显著抵消排放。忽视有机碳动态可能导致对二氧化碳排放量的高估和对净碳影响的不完整评估。因此,考虑到全球变暖影响的显著变化,将有机碳考虑纳入LCAs对于提高农产品环境评价的精度至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Sustainable Production and Consumption
Sustainable Production and Consumption Environmental Science-Environmental Engineering
CiteScore
17.40
自引率
7.40%
发文量
389
审稿时长
13 days
期刊介绍: Sustainable production and consumption refers to the production and utilization of goods and services in a way that benefits society, is economically viable, and has minimal environmental impact throughout its entire lifespan. Our journal is dedicated to publishing top-notch interdisciplinary research and practical studies in this emerging field. We take a distinctive approach by examining the interplay between technology, consumption patterns, and policy to identify sustainable solutions for both production and consumption systems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信