Accurate quantitation of antibiotic penetration through staphylococcal biofilms

IF 4.9 Q1 MICROBIOLOGY
Lou Bin , David McGiffin , Thuy Nguyen , Lv Wang , Yao Sun , Lumei Ye , Meiling Han , Chengju Sheng , Tzong-Hsien Lee , Marie-Isabel Aguilar , Anton Y. Peleg , Yue Qu
{"title":"Accurate quantitation of antibiotic penetration through staphylococcal biofilms","authors":"Lou Bin ,&nbsp;David McGiffin ,&nbsp;Thuy Nguyen ,&nbsp;Lv Wang ,&nbsp;Yao Sun ,&nbsp;Lumei Ye ,&nbsp;Meiling Han ,&nbsp;Chengju Sheng ,&nbsp;Tzong-Hsien Lee ,&nbsp;Marie-Isabel Aguilar ,&nbsp;Anton Y. Peleg ,&nbsp;Yue Qu","doi":"10.1016/j.bioflm.2025.100316","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>Limited antimicrobial penetration is an important mechanism underlying antimicrobial resistance of biofilms and has often been incorrectly quantitated. We adopted a rationalized antibiotic agar-diffusion model to accurately interpret experimental results of a widely-accepted biofilm penetration assay, and to determine drug-related physiochemical properties impacting antimicrobial biofilm penetration.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Staphylococcal reference strains and eight conventional antibiotics were selected for this study. A well-established biofilm penetration assay based on disk diffusion and colony biofilms was used. Sizes of the zone of inhibition (ZOI) were converted to concentrations of antibiotics, using linear regressions of squared radii of the ZOI on the natural logarithm of antibiotic concentrations. Biofilm penetration ratios were calculated by comparing concentrations of antibiotics reaching the agar surface with or without biofilm barriers. Multiple regression analysis was performed to assess the impact of antibiotic physicochemical properties, such as surface charge, on their biofilm penetration.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Ciprofloxacin and oxacillin showed great capacities in penetrating staphylococcal biofilms. Rifampicin penetrated biofilms at low rates of ∼20 %. Aminoglycosides showed strain- and agent-specific penetration ratios, with tobramycin showing the least penetration (17.8 % for <em>Staphylococcus aureus</em> and 35.6 % for <em>Staphylococcus epidermidis</em>) and kanamycin presenting good penetration (∼82.3 %) against <em>S. aureus</em> biofilms. Surface charges of antibiotics at neutral and acidic conditions were important for their biofilm penetration.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Accurate quantitation of antibiotic biofilm penetration can be achieved using the transformed linear regression between the ZOI and antibiotic concentrations. Mathematical evidence was provided to support the importance of surface charge of antimicrobials on their biofilm penetration.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55844,"journal":{"name":"Biofilm","volume":"10 ","pages":"Article 100316"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biofilm","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590207525000644","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

Limited antimicrobial penetration is an important mechanism underlying antimicrobial resistance of biofilms and has often been incorrectly quantitated. We adopted a rationalized antibiotic agar-diffusion model to accurately interpret experimental results of a widely-accepted biofilm penetration assay, and to determine drug-related physiochemical properties impacting antimicrobial biofilm penetration.

Methods

Staphylococcal reference strains and eight conventional antibiotics were selected for this study. A well-established biofilm penetration assay based on disk diffusion and colony biofilms was used. Sizes of the zone of inhibition (ZOI) were converted to concentrations of antibiotics, using linear regressions of squared radii of the ZOI on the natural logarithm of antibiotic concentrations. Biofilm penetration ratios were calculated by comparing concentrations of antibiotics reaching the agar surface with or without biofilm barriers. Multiple regression analysis was performed to assess the impact of antibiotic physicochemical properties, such as surface charge, on their biofilm penetration.

Results

Ciprofloxacin and oxacillin showed great capacities in penetrating staphylococcal biofilms. Rifampicin penetrated biofilms at low rates of ∼20 %. Aminoglycosides showed strain- and agent-specific penetration ratios, with tobramycin showing the least penetration (17.8 % for Staphylococcus aureus and 35.6 % for Staphylococcus epidermidis) and kanamycin presenting good penetration (∼82.3 %) against S. aureus biofilms. Surface charges of antibiotics at neutral and acidic conditions were important for their biofilm penetration.

Conclusions

Accurate quantitation of antibiotic biofilm penetration can be achieved using the transformed linear regression between the ZOI and antibiotic concentrations. Mathematical evidence was provided to support the importance of surface charge of antimicrobials on their biofilm penetration.
准确定量抗生素穿透葡萄球菌生物膜
目的有限的抗微生物药物渗透是生物膜耐药的重要机制,但一直被错误地定量。我们采用合理的抗生素琼脂扩散模型来准确解释广泛接受的生物膜渗透试验的实验结果,并确定影响抗菌生物膜渗透的药物相关理化性质。方法选择葡萄球菌标准菌株和8种常规抗生素进行研究。采用了一种基于圆盘扩散和菌落生物膜的生物膜渗透试验。将抑制区(ZOI)的大小转换为抗生素的浓度,使用ZOI的平方半径对抗生素浓度的自然对数进行线性回归。通过比较有或没有生物膜屏障的抗生素到达琼脂表面的浓度来计算生物膜渗透比。采用多元回归分析来评估抗生素的理化性质(如表面电荷)对其生物膜渗透的影响。结果苯丙沙星和苯丙西林对葡萄球菌生物膜有较强的穿透能力。利福平以约20%的低率穿透生物膜。氨基糖苷显示出菌株和药物特异性的穿透率,妥布霉素对金黄色葡萄球菌的穿透率最低(对金黄色葡萄球菌的穿透率为17.8%,对表皮葡萄球菌的穿透率为35.6%),卡那霉素对金黄色葡萄球菌生物膜的穿透率较好(约82.3%)。抗生素在中性和酸性条件下的表面电荷对其生物膜渗透很重要。结论利用ZOI与抗生素浓度之间的转化线性回归可以准确定量抗生素生物膜渗透。数学证据支持抗菌剂表面电荷对其生物膜渗透的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biofilm
Biofilm MICROBIOLOGY-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
1.50%
发文量
30
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信