Improving patient preparation and comfort in voluntary DIBH – Single-centre quality improvement evaluation

IF 2.8 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
A. Thornley, K. Taylor, S. Goldsworthy
{"title":"Improving patient preparation and comfort in voluntary DIBH – Single-centre quality improvement evaluation","authors":"A. Thornley,&nbsp;K. Taylor,&nbsp;S. Goldsworthy","doi":"10.1016/j.radi.2025.103162","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Voluntary deep-inspiration breath-hold (vDIBH) is commonly used in left breast cancer patients during radiotherapy to reduce cardiac dose and improve setup accuracy. However, some patients have trouble maintaining a consistent, adequate, breath-hold during radiotherapy. This service evaluation assessed the impact of the RESPIRE tool—an online resource offering instructional videos and audio guides—introduced prior to simulation to improve patient compliance and preparedness.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Fifteen eligible breast cancer patients received RESPIRE information during a clinic appointment for Radiotherapy consent, followed by a telephone check-in prior to CT planning. Breath-hold quality was assessed using planning CT metrics and treatment-image reproducibility, and patient experience was qualitatively evaluated.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Compared to historical controls, the fifteen RESPIRE users reported feeling significantly more prepared, and blinded reviews of CBCT images confirmed improved breath-hold reproducibility. Lung volume increased by an average of 32 %, and heart-to-chest wall separation improved following use of the tool.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The results align with existing evidence that guided preparation reduces anxiety and supports successful vDIBH implementation. The intervention addresses current ESTRO-ACROP and national safety priorities by promoting patient engagement, comfort, and technical accuracy.</div></div><div><h3>Implications for practice</h3><div>Pre-treatment education using scalable tools like RESPIRE offers a low-cost, high-impact strategy to enhance radiotherapy outcomes and patient-centred care. Future work could hope to make this tool accessible to a wider cohort of patients, addressing some of the limitations discussed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47416,"journal":{"name":"Radiography","volume":"31 6","pages":"Article 103162"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiography","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1078817425003062","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Voluntary deep-inspiration breath-hold (vDIBH) is commonly used in left breast cancer patients during radiotherapy to reduce cardiac dose and improve setup accuracy. However, some patients have trouble maintaining a consistent, adequate, breath-hold during radiotherapy. This service evaluation assessed the impact of the RESPIRE tool—an online resource offering instructional videos and audio guides—introduced prior to simulation to improve patient compliance and preparedness.

Methods

Fifteen eligible breast cancer patients received RESPIRE information during a clinic appointment for Radiotherapy consent, followed by a telephone check-in prior to CT planning. Breath-hold quality was assessed using planning CT metrics and treatment-image reproducibility, and patient experience was qualitatively evaluated.

Results

Compared to historical controls, the fifteen RESPIRE users reported feeling significantly more prepared, and blinded reviews of CBCT images confirmed improved breath-hold reproducibility. Lung volume increased by an average of 32 %, and heart-to-chest wall separation improved following use of the tool.

Conclusion

The results align with existing evidence that guided preparation reduces anxiety and supports successful vDIBH implementation. The intervention addresses current ESTRO-ACROP and national safety priorities by promoting patient engagement, comfort, and technical accuracy.

Implications for practice

Pre-treatment education using scalable tools like RESPIRE offers a low-cost, high-impact strategy to enhance radiotherapy outcomes and patient-centred care. Future work could hope to make this tool accessible to a wider cohort of patients, addressing some of the limitations discussed.
改善自愿DIBH患者的准备和舒适度——单中心质量改善评价
自愿深吸气屏气术(vDIBH)在左乳腺癌患者放疗期间常用,以减少心脏剂量,提高设置准确性。然而,一些患者在放疗期间难以保持一致、充分的屏气。这项服务评估评估了RESPIRE工具(一种提供教学视频和音频指南的在线资源)的影响,该工具在模拟之前引入,以提高患者的依从性和准备程度。方法15例符合条件的乳腺癌患者在门诊预约放疗同意期间接受呼吸信息,随后在CT计划之前进行电话登记。采用计划CT指标和治疗图像再现性评估屏气质量,并对患者体验进行定性评估。结果与历史对照组相比,15名RESPIRE使用者报告的感觉明显更好,CBCT图像的盲法评价证实了屏气可重复性的提高。使用该工具后,肺容量平均增加32%,心脏与胸壁的分离得到改善。结论该结果与现有证据一致,指导准备可减少焦虑并支持vDIBH的成功实施。该干预措施通过提高患者参与度、舒适度和技术准确性,解决了当前ESTRO-ACROP和国家安全优先事项。使用RESPIRE等可扩展工具进行治疗前教育提供了一种低成本、高影响的策略,以提高放疗结果和以患者为中心的护理。未来的工作有望使该工具适用于更广泛的患者群体,解决所讨论的一些局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Radiography
Radiography RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
34.60%
发文量
169
审稿时长
63 days
期刊介绍: Radiography is an International, English language, peer-reviewed journal of diagnostic imaging and radiation therapy. Radiography is the official professional journal of the College of Radiographers and is published quarterly. Radiography aims to publish the highest quality material, both clinical and scientific, on all aspects of diagnostic imaging and radiation therapy and oncology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信