The role of routine cranial CT imaging in geriatric head trauma: a retrospective analysis from a level I trauma centre in Germany

IF 2.5 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Josina Straub , Julia Elisabeth Lenz , Leopold Henssler , Kristina Gerhardinger , Lisa Klute , Borys Frankewycz , Amr Mohamed , Volker Alt , Daniel Popp , Siegmund Lang , Maximilian Kerschbaum
{"title":"The role of routine cranial CT imaging in geriatric head trauma: a retrospective analysis from a level I trauma centre in Germany","authors":"Josina Straub ,&nbsp;Julia Elisabeth Lenz ,&nbsp;Leopold Henssler ,&nbsp;Kristina Gerhardinger ,&nbsp;Lisa Klute ,&nbsp;Borys Frankewycz ,&nbsp;Amr Mohamed ,&nbsp;Volker Alt ,&nbsp;Daniel Popp ,&nbsp;Siegmund Lang ,&nbsp;Maximilian Kerschbaum","doi":"10.1016/j.bas.2025.105606","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Geriatric patients with head trauma have an increased risk of intracranial injuries. Due to impaired clinical evaluability and the widespread antithrombotic use, cranial computertomography (cCT) is frequently performed.</div></div><div><h3>Research question</h3><div>This study aims to determine the prevalence and risk factors for intracranial haemorrhage and to calculate the number needed to screen (NNS) for its detection in a geriatric cohort.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients aged ≥65 years presenting to a level I trauma centre in Germany between January 2020 and October 2024 after a head impact and undergoing cCT imaging.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among 2474 patients, 62.9 % were aged ≥80 years and 56.1 % were female. Intracranial haemorrhage occurred in 9.3 %, with 1.5 % requiring surgery. Risk factors for intracranial haemorrhage included female gender (OR = 1.4; p = 0.014), impaired consciousness (OR = 3.5; p &lt; 0.001), presentation via resuscitation room (OR = 6.5; p &lt; 0.001) and cervical spine injury (OR = 2.2; p &lt; 0.001). The NNS for detecting intracranial haemorrhage was 10.7 in patients aged ≥65 years and 11.4 in those aged ≥80 years. The NNS in patients without impaired consciousness was 19.2 for those aged ≥65 years and 20.5 for those aged ≥80 years. The NNS for surgical intervention was 65.1 in patients aged ≥65 years and 111.1 in those aged ≥80 years.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion and conclusion</h3><div>Intracranial haemorrhage is a common consequence of head trauma in older patients. Despite its high frequency, routine cCT is crucial for timely identification of acute intracranial pathologies, with the low NNS highlighting its diagnostic value and justifying its widespread use to optimize patients’ outcomes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72443,"journal":{"name":"Brain & spine","volume":"5 ","pages":"Article 105606"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain & spine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772529425014250","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Geriatric patients with head trauma have an increased risk of intracranial injuries. Due to impaired clinical evaluability and the widespread antithrombotic use, cranial computertomography (cCT) is frequently performed.

Research question

This study aims to determine the prevalence and risk factors for intracranial haemorrhage and to calculate the number needed to screen (NNS) for its detection in a geriatric cohort.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients aged ≥65 years presenting to a level I trauma centre in Germany between January 2020 and October 2024 after a head impact and undergoing cCT imaging.

Results

Among 2474 patients, 62.9 % were aged ≥80 years and 56.1 % were female. Intracranial haemorrhage occurred in 9.3 %, with 1.5 % requiring surgery. Risk factors for intracranial haemorrhage included female gender (OR = 1.4; p = 0.014), impaired consciousness (OR = 3.5; p < 0.001), presentation via resuscitation room (OR = 6.5; p < 0.001) and cervical spine injury (OR = 2.2; p < 0.001). The NNS for detecting intracranial haemorrhage was 10.7 in patients aged ≥65 years and 11.4 in those aged ≥80 years. The NNS in patients without impaired consciousness was 19.2 for those aged ≥65 years and 20.5 for those aged ≥80 years. The NNS for surgical intervention was 65.1 in patients aged ≥65 years and 111.1 in those aged ≥80 years.

Discussion and conclusion

Intracranial haemorrhage is a common consequence of head trauma in older patients. Despite its high frequency, routine cCT is crucial for timely identification of acute intracranial pathologies, with the low NNS highlighting its diagnostic value and justifying its widespread use to optimize patients’ outcomes.
常规头颅CT成像在老年头部创伤中的作用:来自德国一级创伤中心的回顾性分析
老年脑外伤患者发生颅内损伤的风险增加。由于临床可评估性受损和广泛的抗血栓使用,颅脑计算机断层扫描(cCT)是经常进行。研究问题:本研究旨在确定颅内出血的患病率和危险因素,并计算在老年队列中检测颅内出血所需的筛查数(NNS)。方法回顾性分析2020年1月至2024年10月在德国一家一级创伤中心就诊的年龄≥65岁的头部撞击患者,并进行了ct成像。结果2474例患者中,年龄≥80岁的占62.9%,女性占56.1%。9.3%发生颅内出血,1.5%需要手术。颅内出血的危险因素包括女性(OR = 1.4; p = 0.014)、意识受损(OR = 3.5; p < 0.001)、经复苏室就诊(OR = 6.5; p < 0.001)和颈椎损伤(OR = 2.2; p < 0.001)。≥65岁患者检测颅内出血的NNS为10.7,≥80岁患者为11.4。≥65岁无意识障碍患者的NNS为19.2,≥80岁无意识障碍患者为20.5。≥65岁患者的手术干预NNS为65.1,≥80岁患者的NNS为111.1。讨论与结论颅内出血是老年颅脑外伤的常见后果。尽管其频率很高,但常规cCT对于及时识别急性颅内病变至关重要,低NNS突出了其诊断价值,并证明其广泛应用于优化患者预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Brain & spine
Brain & spine Surgery
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
71 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信