Hsiuyi V. Chen , Siew-Wai Fong , Yun Shan Goh , Matthew Zirui Tay , Angeline Rouers , Zi Wei Chang , Andrea Wei Ming Chua , Liang Hui Loo , SCOPE cohort Study Group , Jean-Marc Chavatte , Raymond Tzer Pin Lin , Yee-Sin Leo , Chiea Chuen Khor , David C. Lye , Laurent Renia , Barnaby Edward Young , Lisa F.P. Ng
{"title":"Human indels as predictors of antibody responses to COVID-19 vaccines","authors":"Hsiuyi V. Chen , Siew-Wai Fong , Yun Shan Goh , Matthew Zirui Tay , Angeline Rouers , Zi Wei Chang , Andrea Wei Ming Chua , Liang Hui Loo , SCOPE cohort Study Group , Jean-Marc Chavatte , Raymond Tzer Pin Lin , Yee-Sin Leo , Chiea Chuen Khor , David C. Lye , Laurent Renia , Barnaby Edward Young , Lisa F.P. Ng","doi":"10.1016/j.isci.2025.113475","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Vaccine efficacy varies significantly among adults. This variability underlies the limitation of a one-size-fits-all vaccination strategy and the need for more personalized approaches. We investigated factors influencing inter-individual variability in antibody responses to COVID-19 mRNA vaccine among adults. Neutralizing antibody (nAb) levels after the first vaccine dose were associated with infection outcomes within 1 year after vaccination, suggesting their potential as a correlate of protection. Age, sex, and Chinese ethnicity were associated with nAb and anti-spike protein antibody levels. Two indels located at chr1:31433042 and chr15:76311269 showed significant association with antibody responses. Leveraging these host factors, we developed a Random Forest model that predicted vaccine-induced antibody responses with 72.7% accuracy for mRNA vaccine and 76.9% for the Sinopharm COVID-19 inactivated virus vaccine. These findings support predictive modeling as a tool to identify individuals at risk of low vaccine responses, enabling more targeted and effective vaccination strategies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":342,"journal":{"name":"iScience","volume":"28 10","pages":"Article 113475"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"iScience","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589004225017365","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Vaccine efficacy varies significantly among adults. This variability underlies the limitation of a one-size-fits-all vaccination strategy and the need for more personalized approaches. We investigated factors influencing inter-individual variability in antibody responses to COVID-19 mRNA vaccine among adults. Neutralizing antibody (nAb) levels after the first vaccine dose were associated with infection outcomes within 1 year after vaccination, suggesting their potential as a correlate of protection. Age, sex, and Chinese ethnicity were associated with nAb and anti-spike protein antibody levels. Two indels located at chr1:31433042 and chr15:76311269 showed significant association with antibody responses. Leveraging these host factors, we developed a Random Forest model that predicted vaccine-induced antibody responses with 72.7% accuracy for mRNA vaccine and 76.9% for the Sinopharm COVID-19 inactivated virus vaccine. These findings support predictive modeling as a tool to identify individuals at risk of low vaccine responses, enabling more targeted and effective vaccination strategies.
期刊介绍:
Science has many big remaining questions. To address them, we will need to work collaboratively and across disciplines. The goal of iScience is to help fuel that type of interdisciplinary thinking. iScience is a new open-access journal from Cell Press that provides a platform for original research in the life, physical, and earth sciences. The primary criterion for publication in iScience is a significant contribution to a relevant field combined with robust results and underlying methodology. The advances appearing in iScience include both fundamental and applied investigations across this interdisciplinary range of topic areas. To support transparency in scientific investigation, we are happy to consider replication studies and papers that describe negative results.
We know you want your work to be published quickly and to be widely visible within your community and beyond. With the strong international reputation of Cell Press behind it, publication in iScience will help your work garner the attention and recognition it merits. Like all Cell Press journals, iScience prioritizes rapid publication. Our editorial team pays special attention to high-quality author service and to efficient, clear-cut decisions based on the information available within the manuscript. iScience taps into the expertise across Cell Press journals and selected partners to inform our editorial decisions and help publish your science in a timely and seamless way.