Improved convenience or a cyber security threat? Public acceptance of mobility-as-a-service in Great Britain

IF 7.4 2区 经济学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Pegah Mirzania , Nazmiye Balta-Ozkan , Lorraine Whitmarsh
{"title":"Improved convenience or a cyber security threat? Public acceptance of mobility-as-a-service in Great Britain","authors":"Pegah Mirzania ,&nbsp;Nazmiye Balta-Ozkan ,&nbsp;Lorraine Whitmarsh","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2025.104309","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study examines public perceptions of <strong>Mobility-as-a-Service (MaaS)</strong>—an emerging transport model that integrates multiple services such as public transit, ridesharing, and cycling into a single, user-friendly digital platform, offering travellers a comprehensive multimodal transportation solution. While MaaS is gaining traction, it remains a relatively new concept, and public understanding and acceptance are still developing. To explore this, we conducted four online focus groups in January 2024 with 24 participants from both urban and rural areas across Great Britain, including London, Greater Manchester, rural Exeter, and rural Norwich. Using the <strong>Technology Acceptance Model</strong> as a framework, we investigated factors influencing willingness to adopt MaaS, including practical concerns and digital trust.</div><div>Our findings indicate that adoption is influenced by location, technological familiarity, cost, and socio-demographic factors such as age. Participants in rural areas questioned the feasibility of MaaS in their local contexts. While concerns about data privacy and cyber security were not initially raised, once prompted, they emerged as important factors shaping trust and adoption. Based on these findings, we recommend that MaaS providers prioritise data security, transparency, and effective communication to support broader adoption. Incorporating security features into the core service design is also essential for building user trust and encouraging wider acceptance.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":"127 ","pages":"Article 104309"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Research & Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629625003901","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examines public perceptions of Mobility-as-a-Service (MaaS)—an emerging transport model that integrates multiple services such as public transit, ridesharing, and cycling into a single, user-friendly digital platform, offering travellers a comprehensive multimodal transportation solution. While MaaS is gaining traction, it remains a relatively new concept, and public understanding and acceptance are still developing. To explore this, we conducted four online focus groups in January 2024 with 24 participants from both urban and rural areas across Great Britain, including London, Greater Manchester, rural Exeter, and rural Norwich. Using the Technology Acceptance Model as a framework, we investigated factors influencing willingness to adopt MaaS, including practical concerns and digital trust.
Our findings indicate that adoption is influenced by location, technological familiarity, cost, and socio-demographic factors such as age. Participants in rural areas questioned the feasibility of MaaS in their local contexts. While concerns about data privacy and cyber security were not initially raised, once prompted, they emerged as important factors shaping trust and adoption. Based on these findings, we recommend that MaaS providers prioritise data security, transparency, and effective communication to support broader adoption. Incorporating security features into the core service design is also essential for building user trust and encouraging wider acceptance.
提高便利性还是网络安全威胁?英国公众对出行即服务的接受程度
本研究调查了公众对出行即服务(MaaS)的看法。MaaS是一种新兴的交通模式,将公共交通、拼车和自行车等多种服务整合到一个单一的、用户友好的数字平台中,为旅行者提供全面的多式联运解决方案。虽然MaaS越来越受欢迎,但它仍然是一个相对较新的概念,公众的理解和接受程度仍在发展中。为了探讨这一点,我们在2024年1月进行了四个在线焦点小组,共有24名参与者来自英国的城市和农村地区,包括伦敦、大曼彻斯特、埃克塞特农村和诺里奇农村。以技术接受模型为框架,我们调查了影响采用MaaS意愿的因素,包括实际问题和数字信任。我们的研究结果表明,采用率受到地理位置、技术熟悉程度、成本和年龄等社会人口因素的影响。农村地区的与会者质疑MaaS在当地的可行性。虽然最初没有人提出对数据隐私和网络安全的担忧,但一旦提出,它们就成为影响信任和采用的重要因素。基于这些发现,我们建议MaaS提供商优先考虑数据安全性、透明度和有效的通信,以支持更广泛的采用。将安全特性集成到核心服务设计中对于建立用户信任和鼓励更广泛的接受也是必不可少的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Energy Research & Social Science
Energy Research & Social Science ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
14.00
自引率
16.40%
发文量
441
审稿时长
55 days
期刊介绍: Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) is a peer-reviewed international journal that publishes original research and review articles examining the relationship between energy systems and society. ERSS covers a range of topics revolving around the intersection of energy technologies, fuels, and resources on one side and social processes and influences - including communities of energy users, people affected by energy production, social institutions, customs, traditions, behaviors, and policies - on the other. Put another way, ERSS investigates the social system surrounding energy technology and hardware. ERSS is relevant for energy practitioners, researchers interested in the social aspects of energy production or use, and policymakers. Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) provides an interdisciplinary forum to discuss how social and technical issues related to energy production and consumption interact. Energy production, distribution, and consumption all have both technical and human components, and the latter involves the human causes and consequences of energy-related activities and processes as well as social structures that shape how people interact with energy systems. Energy analysis, therefore, needs to look beyond the dimensions of technology and economics to include these social and human elements.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信