Long-term application of sulfur-coated urea: From soil fertility improvement to increased acidification risk

IF 6.4 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Xinyu Luo, Yuezhuo Zhuang, Yang Liu, Zirui Zheng, Ziyi Wang, Yiting Wang, Heping Chen, Haojie Feng, Wenkui Zheng, Qi Chen, Luncheng You, Min Zhang, Zhiguang Liu
{"title":"Long-term application of sulfur-coated urea: From soil fertility improvement to increased acidification risk","authors":"Xinyu Luo,&nbsp;Yuezhuo Zhuang,&nbsp;Yang Liu,&nbsp;Zirui Zheng,&nbsp;Ziyi Wang,&nbsp;Yiting Wang,&nbsp;Heping Chen,&nbsp;Haojie Feng,&nbsp;Wenkui Zheng,&nbsp;Qi Chen,&nbsp;Luncheng You,&nbsp;Min Zhang,&nbsp;Zhiguang Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.agee.2025.109967","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Sulfur-coated urea (SCU) is widely used in agriculture due to its cost-effectiveness, synchronized nitrogen (N) release with crop uptake, and enhanced sulfur (S) availability. However, most studies have primarily focused on the short-term yield-enhancing mechanisms of SCU, while its long-term impact on soil quality remains unclear. To address this gap, the effects of SCU on wheat yield and microbial functional profiles were investigated using a 15-year, 30-season wheat-maize rotation experiment and metagenomic analysis. Compared with urea (U), SCU application resulted in a short-term increase in wheat yield, followed by a sharp decline over the years. This decline may be linked to a significant decrease of 0.49 units in soil pH relative to U. Comparing the relative abundance of genes in U and SCU, it was found that SCU reduced the relative abundance of genes related to carbon (C) fixation and nitrification by 11.40–16.87 % and 24.14–50.02 %, respectively, while increasing the abundance of genes related to C degradation and sulfite oxidation by 8.34–11.75 % and 16.29–41.96 %, respectively. Variance partitioning analysis showed that biotic and abiotic factors synergistically explained 55.1–58.1 % of the variation in gene abundance. Structural equation modeling revealed that long-term SCU application had a significant positive effect on yield growth, but declining soil pH emerged as the primary limiting factor. In summary, while SCU enhances wheat yield and regulates soil fertility in the short term, its prolonged use increases the risk of acidification and long-term yield decline.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7512,"journal":{"name":"Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment","volume":"396 ","pages":"Article 109967"},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167880925004992","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Sulfur-coated urea (SCU) is widely used in agriculture due to its cost-effectiveness, synchronized nitrogen (N) release with crop uptake, and enhanced sulfur (S) availability. However, most studies have primarily focused on the short-term yield-enhancing mechanisms of SCU, while its long-term impact on soil quality remains unclear. To address this gap, the effects of SCU on wheat yield and microbial functional profiles were investigated using a 15-year, 30-season wheat-maize rotation experiment and metagenomic analysis. Compared with urea (U), SCU application resulted in a short-term increase in wheat yield, followed by a sharp decline over the years. This decline may be linked to a significant decrease of 0.49 units in soil pH relative to U. Comparing the relative abundance of genes in U and SCU, it was found that SCU reduced the relative abundance of genes related to carbon (C) fixation and nitrification by 11.40–16.87 % and 24.14–50.02 %, respectively, while increasing the abundance of genes related to C degradation and sulfite oxidation by 8.34–11.75 % and 16.29–41.96 %, respectively. Variance partitioning analysis showed that biotic and abiotic factors synergistically explained 55.1–58.1 % of the variation in gene abundance. Structural equation modeling revealed that long-term SCU application had a significant positive effect on yield growth, but declining soil pH emerged as the primary limiting factor. In summary, while SCU enhances wheat yield and regulates soil fertility in the short term, its prolonged use increases the risk of acidification and long-term yield decline.
长期施用硫包尿素:从改善土壤肥力到增加酸化风险
硫包膜尿素(SCU)具有成本效益高、氮素释放与作物吸收同步、硫(S)利用率高等优点,在农业中得到了广泛应用。然而,大多数研究主要集中在SCU的短期增产机制上,而其对土壤质量的长期影响尚不清楚。为了解决这一空白,通过15年30季小麦-玉米轮作试验和宏基因组分析,研究了SCU对小麦产量和微生物功能谱的影响。与尿素(U)相比,施SCU导致小麦产量短期增加,随后多年急剧下降。这种下降可能与土壤pH相对U显著降低0.49个单位有关。比较U和SCU中基因的相对丰度,发现SCU使碳(C)固定和硝化相关基因的相对丰度分别降低了11.40 ~ 16.87 %和24.14 ~ 50.02 %,而使C降解和亚硫酸盐氧化相关基因的相对丰度分别提高了8.34 ~ 11.75 %和16.29 ~ 41.96 %。方差划分分析表明,生物因子和非生物因子协同解释了基因丰度变异的55.1 - 58.1% %。结构方程模型表明,长期施用SCU对产量增长有显著的正向影响,但土壤pH下降是主要的限制因素。综上所述,SCU在短期内提高了小麦产量,调节了土壤肥力,但长期使用增加了酸化风险,长期产量下降。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment
Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
11.70
自引率
9.10%
发文量
392
审稿时长
26 days
期刊介绍: Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment publishes scientific articles dealing with the interface between agroecosystems and the natural environment, specifically how agriculture influences the environment and how changes in that environment impact agroecosystems. Preference is given to papers from experimental and observational research at the field, system or landscape level, from studies that enhance our understanding of processes using data-based biophysical modelling, and papers that bridge scientific disciplines and integrate knowledge. All papers should be placed in an international or wide comparative context.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信