Extra-simplified eco-viticulture increases contributions of plant lignin and microbial necromass to soil organic carbon within vineyards

IF 6.4 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Zhouyang He , Yuxin Yuan , Zhengwen Zhang , Bihan Lv , Xuedong Shao , Xiaomin Zhong , Hua Li , Hua Wang
{"title":"Extra-simplified eco-viticulture increases contributions of plant lignin and microbial necromass to soil organic carbon within vineyards","authors":"Zhouyang He ,&nbsp;Yuxin Yuan ,&nbsp;Zhengwen Zhang ,&nbsp;Bihan Lv ,&nbsp;Xuedong Shao ,&nbsp;Xiaomin Zhong ,&nbsp;Hua Li ,&nbsp;Hua Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.agee.2025.109970","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Although vineyard soils are regarded as having substantial potential for carbon sequestration, the coupled relationship between conventional viticulture, the implementation of vineyard ecological management, and the resulting alterations in soil conditions and sources of soil organic carbon (SOC) remains underexplored. Accordingly, we conducted a five-year vineyard trial in Penglai, Yantai, China to compare different management practices, including traditional viticulture (TV) and extra-simplified eco-viticulture (EV) modes applied to each of Cabernet Sauvignon and Italian Riesling vineyards, with adjacent uncultivated land (CK) as a control. This study investigated the SOC content and carbon stock in soils at various depths within each sample plot, and tracked the dynamics of plant- and microbial-derived compounds using two groups of biomarkers (lignin phenols and amino sugars) along with their relative contributions to SOC. The results showed that long-term TV significantly improved the SOC pool, and based on this, the implementation of EV resulted in a further increase in SOC content and carbon stocks by 7.21–24.05 % and 10.82–30.00 %, respectively. Plant- (31–53 %) and microbial-derived carbon (30–47 %) contributed similarly to SOC in vineyards, but their contents in the EV were generally higher than those in TV. Lignin phenol accumulation was predominantly regulated by plant properties (grapevine basal diameter and grapevine biomass [GB]) and soil abiotic factors (pH, total nitrogen, total phosphorus, total potassium, etc.), while amino sugars were influenced by a smaller set of factors (grapevine root biomass, GB, pH, SOC, and microbial biomass phosphorus). GB and pH were particularly important as co-driver factors for soil carbon sequestration. Furthermore, the effect of viticulture mode on the SOC pool was most pronounced in the 0–10 cm soil depth, gradually decreasing with soil depth. In conclusion, we considered that the EV mode was a recommended practice for sustainable vineyard.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7512,"journal":{"name":"Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment","volume":"396 ","pages":"Article 109970"},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016788092500502X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although vineyard soils are regarded as having substantial potential for carbon sequestration, the coupled relationship between conventional viticulture, the implementation of vineyard ecological management, and the resulting alterations in soil conditions and sources of soil organic carbon (SOC) remains underexplored. Accordingly, we conducted a five-year vineyard trial in Penglai, Yantai, China to compare different management practices, including traditional viticulture (TV) and extra-simplified eco-viticulture (EV) modes applied to each of Cabernet Sauvignon and Italian Riesling vineyards, with adjacent uncultivated land (CK) as a control. This study investigated the SOC content and carbon stock in soils at various depths within each sample plot, and tracked the dynamics of plant- and microbial-derived compounds using two groups of biomarkers (lignin phenols and amino sugars) along with their relative contributions to SOC. The results showed that long-term TV significantly improved the SOC pool, and based on this, the implementation of EV resulted in a further increase in SOC content and carbon stocks by 7.21–24.05 % and 10.82–30.00 %, respectively. Plant- (31–53 %) and microbial-derived carbon (30–47 %) contributed similarly to SOC in vineyards, but their contents in the EV were generally higher than those in TV. Lignin phenol accumulation was predominantly regulated by plant properties (grapevine basal diameter and grapevine biomass [GB]) and soil abiotic factors (pH, total nitrogen, total phosphorus, total potassium, etc.), while amino sugars were influenced by a smaller set of factors (grapevine root biomass, GB, pH, SOC, and microbial biomass phosphorus). GB and pH were particularly important as co-driver factors for soil carbon sequestration. Furthermore, the effect of viticulture mode on the SOC pool was most pronounced in the 0–10 cm soil depth, gradually decreasing with soil depth. In conclusion, we considered that the EV mode was a recommended practice for sustainable vineyard.
超简化生态葡萄栽培增加了植物木质素和微生物坏死团对葡萄园土壤有机碳的贡献
尽管葡萄园土壤被认为具有巨大的固碳潜力,但传统葡萄栽培、葡萄园生态管理的实施以及由此产生的土壤条件和土壤有机碳(SOC)来源的变化之间的耦合关系仍未得到充分探讨。因此,我们在中国烟台蓬莱进行了为期五年的葡萄园试验,以比较不同的管理实践,包括传统葡萄栽培(TV)和超简化生态葡萄栽培(EV)模式,分别应用于赤霞珠和意大利雷司令葡萄园,并以邻近的未开垦土地(CK)作为对照。本研究研究了每个样地不同深度土壤的有机碳含量和碳储量,并利用两组生物标志物(木质素酚类和氨基糖)跟踪了植物和微生物衍生化合物的动态及其对有机碳的相对贡献。结果表明,长期电视显著改善了土壤有机碳库,在此基础上,电动汽车的实施使土壤有机碳含量和碳储量分别提高了7.21 ~ 24.05 %和10.82 ~ 30.00 %。植物碳(31-53 %)和微生物源碳(30-47 %)对葡萄园有机碳的贡献相似,但它们在EV中的含量普遍高于TV。木质素酚的积累主要受植物性状(葡萄基径和葡萄生物量[GB])和土壤非生物因子(pH、全氮、全磷、全钾等)的调节,而氨基糖的积累则受较少的因子(葡萄根生物量、GB、pH、有机碳和微生物生物量磷)的影响。GB和pH作为土壤固碳的共同驱动因子尤为重要。葡萄栽培方式对土壤有机碳库的影响在0 ~ 10 cm土层最显著,随土层深度的增加而逐渐降低。综上所述,我们认为EV模式是可持续葡萄园的推荐实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment
Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
11.70
自引率
9.10%
发文量
392
审稿时长
26 days
期刊介绍: Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment publishes scientific articles dealing with the interface between agroecosystems and the natural environment, specifically how agriculture influences the environment and how changes in that environment impact agroecosystems. Preference is given to papers from experimental and observational research at the field, system or landscape level, from studies that enhance our understanding of processes using data-based biophysical modelling, and papers that bridge scientific disciplines and integrate knowledge. All papers should be placed in an international or wide comparative context.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信