Physiological mechanisms and agronomic strategies underlying flood tolerance variability in dryland crops: A global meta-analysis

IF 6.4 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRONOMY
Shen Qiu , Yanjun Zhang , Jianlong Dai , Hezhong Dong
{"title":"Physiological mechanisms and agronomic strategies underlying flood tolerance variability in dryland crops: A global meta-analysis","authors":"Shen Qiu ,&nbsp;Yanjun Zhang ,&nbsp;Jianlong Dai ,&nbsp;Hezhong Dong","doi":"10.1016/j.fcr.2025.110146","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Context</h3><div>The increasing frequency of flooding events poses significant challenges to global agricultural sustainability in dryland systems, demanding urgent insights into crop-specific resilience mechanisms and adaptive strategies linked to yield formation.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Through a global meta-analysis of 217 peer-reviewed studies, we systematically evaluate flood tolerance and agronomic mitigation strategies across six major dryland crops (cotton, maize, peanut, rapeseed, soybean, and wheat) by integrating yield, biomass, and physiological traits (e.g., photosynthesis, antioxidant enzymes). A novel flood tolerance index (FTI) was developed to quantify resilience.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among the six crops examined, wheat and rapeseed demonstrated the highest flood tolerance (FTI: 0.80 and 0.77, respectively), followed by soybean and cotton (0.68 and 0.64), while peanut and maize displayed the lowest tolerance (0.61 and 0.57). These variations in flooding tolerance align with differences in reliance on three adaptation strategies: quiescence (e.g., antioxidant enzyme activity), compensatory growth (post-flood photosynthetic recovery), and escape (aerenchyma formation), regulated by flood-responsive genes such as <em>Zea mays</em> ethylene response factor B 180 (<em>ZmEREB180</em>) and <em>Brassica napus</em> phytoglobin 1 (<em>BnPgb1</em>). Agronomic interventions, such as raised-bed cultivation, bio-stimulants, post-flood fertilization and diversified intercropping, enhanced crop yield by 7.3–55.2 % through improving these adaptation strategies.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The analysis reveals significant variation in flood tolerance among dryland crops, driven by different reliance on escape, quiescence, and compensatory strategies. Building on these insights, we propose a flooding-smart adaptation (FSA) framework that integrates crop physiology with agronomic practices, offering a scalable pathway to mitigate economic losses and stabilize productivity in flood-prone regions. This study advances methodologies for resilience assessment and provides actionable strategies to align crop ecology with climate-smart agriculture.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12143,"journal":{"name":"Field Crops Research","volume":"334 ","pages":"Article 110146"},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Field Crops Research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378429025004113","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context

The increasing frequency of flooding events poses significant challenges to global agricultural sustainability in dryland systems, demanding urgent insights into crop-specific resilience mechanisms and adaptive strategies linked to yield formation.

Methods

Through a global meta-analysis of 217 peer-reviewed studies, we systematically evaluate flood tolerance and agronomic mitigation strategies across six major dryland crops (cotton, maize, peanut, rapeseed, soybean, and wheat) by integrating yield, biomass, and physiological traits (e.g., photosynthesis, antioxidant enzymes). A novel flood tolerance index (FTI) was developed to quantify resilience.

Results

Among the six crops examined, wheat and rapeseed demonstrated the highest flood tolerance (FTI: 0.80 and 0.77, respectively), followed by soybean and cotton (0.68 and 0.64), while peanut and maize displayed the lowest tolerance (0.61 and 0.57). These variations in flooding tolerance align with differences in reliance on three adaptation strategies: quiescence (e.g., antioxidant enzyme activity), compensatory growth (post-flood photosynthetic recovery), and escape (aerenchyma formation), regulated by flood-responsive genes such as Zea mays ethylene response factor B 180 (ZmEREB180) and Brassica napus phytoglobin 1 (BnPgb1). Agronomic interventions, such as raised-bed cultivation, bio-stimulants, post-flood fertilization and diversified intercropping, enhanced crop yield by 7.3–55.2 % through improving these adaptation strategies.

Conclusions

The analysis reveals significant variation in flood tolerance among dryland crops, driven by different reliance on escape, quiescence, and compensatory strategies. Building on these insights, we propose a flooding-smart adaptation (FSA) framework that integrates crop physiology with agronomic practices, offering a scalable pathway to mitigate economic losses and stabilize productivity in flood-prone regions. This study advances methodologies for resilience assessment and provides actionable strategies to align crop ecology with climate-smart agriculture.
旱地作物抗洪变异的生理机制和农艺策略:一项全球荟萃分析
日益频繁的洪水事件对全球旱地系统的农业可持续性构成了重大挑战,迫切需要深入了解与产量形成相关的特定作物抗灾机制和适应策略。方法通过对217项同行评议研究的全球荟萃分析,我们通过综合产量、生物量和生理性状(如光合作用、抗氧化酶),系统地评估了6种主要旱地作物(棉花、玉米、花生、油菜籽、大豆和小麦)的抗洪能力和农艺缓解策略。提出了一种新的洪水耐受指数(FTI)来量化恢复力。结果6种作物中,小麦和油菜籽的抗洪能力最高(分别为0.80和0.77),其次是大豆和棉花(分别为0.68和0.64),花生和玉米的抗洪能力最低(分别为0.61和0.57)。这些抗洪能力的差异与三种适应策略的依赖差异一致:静止(如抗氧化酶活性)、代偿性生长(洪水后光合恢复)和逃逸(空气组织形成),由洪水响应基因如玉米乙烯反应因子b180 (ZmEREB180)和甘蓝型油菜植物红蛋白1 (BnPgb1)调节。通过改进这些适应策略,农艺干预措施,如垄作、生物刺激剂、洪水后施肥和多样化间作,使作物产量提高了7.3 - 55.2% %。结论旱地作物的抗洪能力存在显著差异,主要受逃避、静止和补偿策略的影响。在这些见解的基础上,我们提出了一个洪水智能适应(FSA)框架,该框架将作物生理学与农艺实践相结合,为减轻洪水易发地区的经济损失和稳定生产力提供了可扩展的途径。本研究推进了恢复力评估方法,并提供了使作物生态与气候智能型农业相结合的可行策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Field Crops Research
Field Crops Research 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
9.60
自引率
12.10%
发文量
307
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: Field Crops Research is an international journal publishing scientific articles on: √ experimental and modelling research at field, farm and landscape levels on temperate and tropical crops and cropping systems, with a focus on crop ecology and physiology, agronomy, and plant genetics and breeding.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信