An integrated model of water–sediment-energy simulation and its application in the Xiaolangdi reservoir

IF 6.3 1区 地球科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
Xianziyi Zhang , Junqiang Xia , Yifei Cheng , Meirong Zhou , Zenghui Wang , Cuixia Chen
{"title":"An integrated model of water–sediment-energy simulation and its application in the Xiaolangdi reservoir","authors":"Xianziyi Zhang ,&nbsp;Junqiang Xia ,&nbsp;Yifei Cheng ,&nbsp;Meirong Zhou ,&nbsp;Zenghui Wang ,&nbsp;Cuixia Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.jhydrol.2025.134131","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The Xiaolangdi (XLD) Reservoir stands as a pivotal reservoir for the water–sediment regulation and power generation in the Yellow River Basin. The coexistent process of water–sediment-energy during the pre-flood period causes the competition among multi-objectives: power generation, water supply, deposition reduction in the reservoir area and the downstream channel. To balance the trade-off between reservoir sustainability and utility value, a model framework is proposed in this study, following the route of “scheme design-model simulation-scheme evaluation”. The framework integrates a reservoir operation module, a hydrodynamic-based water–sediment-energy simulation module, and a benefit evaluation method based on the Fuzzy Neural Network (FNN). Firstly, the water–sediment-energy simulation module was validated against the 2013 and 2014 water–sediment regulation events, showing good agreement with the field measurements. Subsequently, by altering two key scheduling parameters of CWL (connecting water level) and RWL (refilled water level) based on the 2014 water–sediment regulation event, different operation schemes were evaluated based on the comprehensive performance of VS (vented sediment amount from reservoir), TV (total volume of discharge greater than 2600 m<sup>3</sup>/s), PG (power generation amount), and SC (final storage capacity) with the trained FNN. The proposed optimal values of CWL and RWL were 217 m and 211 m, with the relative membership degrees of 0.750 and 0.754, respectively. This finding suggests that maintaining a continuous low pool level in the XLD Reservoir is optimal for securing higher comprehensive benefits in case of insufficient water inflow, with the effect of deposition reduction being a notable advantage.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":362,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hydrology","volume":"663 ","pages":"Article 134131"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hydrology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022169425014696","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Xiaolangdi (XLD) Reservoir stands as a pivotal reservoir for the water–sediment regulation and power generation in the Yellow River Basin. The coexistent process of water–sediment-energy during the pre-flood period causes the competition among multi-objectives: power generation, water supply, deposition reduction in the reservoir area and the downstream channel. To balance the trade-off between reservoir sustainability and utility value, a model framework is proposed in this study, following the route of “scheme design-model simulation-scheme evaluation”. The framework integrates a reservoir operation module, a hydrodynamic-based water–sediment-energy simulation module, and a benefit evaluation method based on the Fuzzy Neural Network (FNN). Firstly, the water–sediment-energy simulation module was validated against the 2013 and 2014 water–sediment regulation events, showing good agreement with the field measurements. Subsequently, by altering two key scheduling parameters of CWL (connecting water level) and RWL (refilled water level) based on the 2014 water–sediment regulation event, different operation schemes were evaluated based on the comprehensive performance of VS (vented sediment amount from reservoir), TV (total volume of discharge greater than 2600 m3/s), PG (power generation amount), and SC (final storage capacity) with the trained FNN. The proposed optimal values of CWL and RWL were 217 m and 211 m, with the relative membership degrees of 0.750 and 0.754, respectively. This finding suggests that maintaining a continuous low pool level in the XLD Reservoir is optimal for securing higher comprehensive benefits in case of insufficient water inflow, with the effect of deposition reduction being a notable advantage.

Abstract Image

水-沙-能综合模拟模型及其在小浪底水库的应用
小浪底水库是黄河流域水沙调蓄和发电的枢纽水库。洪水前期水沙能共存的过程导致库区发电、供水、库区减淤和下游河道等多目标之间的竞争。为平衡水库可持续性与效用价值之间的关系,本文提出了“方案设计-模型模拟-方案评价”的模型框架。该框架集成了水库运行模块、基于水动力的水沙能模拟模块和基于模糊神经网络(FNN)的效益评价方法。首先,利用2013年和2014年的水沙调节事件对水沙能模拟模块进行了验证,结果与实测结果吻合较好。随后,基于2014年水沙调节事件,通过改变连接水位(CWL)和补水水位(RWL)两个关键调度参数,利用训练好的FNN,对水库排沙量VS、总排水量TV(大于2600 m3/s)、发电量PG和最终库容SC的综合性能进行不同运行方案的评价。建议的最优值为CWL为217 m, RWL为211 m,相对隶属度分别为0.750和0.754。这一发现表明,在来水不足的情况下,XLD水库保持持续的低池位是获得更高综合效益的最佳选择,减少沉积的效果是一个显著的优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Hydrology
Journal of Hydrology 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
12.50%
发文量
1309
审稿时长
7.5 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Hydrology publishes original research papers and comprehensive reviews in all the subfields of the hydrological sciences including water based management and policy issues that impact on economics and society. These comprise, but are not limited to the physical, chemical, biogeochemical, stochastic and systems aspects of surface and groundwater hydrology, hydrometeorology and hydrogeology. Relevant topics incorporating the insights and methodologies of disciplines such as climatology, water resource systems, hydraulics, agrohydrology, geomorphology, soil science, instrumentation and remote sensing, civil and environmental engineering are included. Social science perspectives on hydrological problems such as resource and ecological economics, environmental sociology, psychology and behavioural science, management and policy analysis are also invited. Multi-and interdisciplinary analyses of hydrological problems are within scope. The science published in the Journal of Hydrology is relevant to catchment scales rather than exclusively to a local scale or site.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信